Lawmakers meet on desegregation funds
ADVERSTISMENT
|
• E-mail item • Print item • Comments • iPod friendly |
Arkansas lawmakers are venting frustration with the pace of trying to end the roughly $60 million the state pays each year in desegregation funding to three school districts.
Members of a legislative task force on Tuesday met with attorneys for the state and the Little Rock, North Little Rock and Pulaski County school districts to talk about the long-running desegregation case. The meeting was the panel's first since a federal appeals court said earlier this year that Little Rock's schools are successfully desegregated.
The state has paid the districts more than $845 million through a 1989 settlement in the case. Both North Little Rock and Pulaski County are seeking to be declared unitary, or substantially desegregated, by a federal judge.
This article was published July 14, 2009 at 5:46 p.m.-
- NEWS
- Arkansas
- Today's Newspaper
- Extras
- Obituaries
- Opinion / Letters
- Religion
- National
- Politics
- World
- Offbeat
- Living Green
- Archives
- Sister Papers
- E-mail Updates
- Weather
- BUSINESS
- Business
- Today's Newspaper
- Business wire
- Tech wire
- SPORTS
- Arkansas Sports
- Today's Newspaper
- Razorbacks
- LR Marathon
- High School News
- High School Football
- Recruiting Guy Blog
-
- Submit a Hole in One
- AP Sports
- College Football
- NFL
- NBA
- MLB
- PGA
- NASCAR
- Tennis
- ENTERTAINMENT
- Entertainment
- Weekend
- Events Calendar
- Movies
- Movie Finder
- Music
- Dining Out
- Restaurant Finder
- Today's Newspaper
- Travel
- Book Bytes
- Entertainment wire
- Comics
- Online games
- Sudoku
- TV listings
- WEB EXTRAS
- Video
- Photos for purchase
- Staff Galleries
-
- Community Photos
- Databases
- Blogs
- Polls
- Support Groups & Clubs
- Arkansas Links
- AP Photos
- AP Videos
- COMMUNITY NEWS
- Tri-Lakes Edition
- River Valley & Ozark Edition
- Three Rivers Edition
- SUBMISSIONS
- Honors & Achievements
- Bridal, engagements & anniversaries
- Calendar Events
- Support & Club meetings
- Letters to the Editor
- Submit a Hole in One
- News Tips
- SPECIAL FEATURES
- Features list
- Inauguration
- Previous News Features
- A Soldier's Wife
- War Casualties
- Central High: A Look Back
- Democrat-Gazette History
-
- CONTACT
- Forgotten Password?
- Advertising
- Corporate
- Newspaper Staff
- Website Staff
- Newspaper Delivery
- FAQ
- TARGETED PUBLICATIONS
- Sync
- Capture Arkansas
- Arkansas Life
- HerStyle
- Special Sections
- Taking New Patients
- Where We Live
- Downtown Little Rock
- Spelling Bee
- PROMOTIONS
- Bridal Show
- Contests
- Democrat-Gazette Store
- CLASSIFIEDS
- Classifieds
- Jobs
- Real Estate
- Auto
- Jobs with Us
- ADVERTISING
- Advertise with us

Comments
To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.
TheBatt says...
This is exactly what happens when you throw money at a problem, particularly taxpayer money - the entity or individual receiving the funds becomes dependent on those funds.
Kind of interesting when compared to the figures around the state on "per-pupil" funding. Seems that I remember that one of the pieces of the Arkansas Supreme Court ruling in the Lakeview case was that such funding was not equitable or adequate.
July 14, 2009 at 8:57 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
rekim55_sbcglobal-net says...
Once the funding stream ends, then those who have "profited" from the case will have to find another "gravy train" to ride.
July 15, 2009 at 9:58 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Login to comment
If you are already registered, click here to LOGIN.
You can register for FREE to post comments and receive alerts.