6 judges reject PSC approval of power plant
Appeals panel says consent given in stages counter to law
Today's Most Popular Stories
ADVERSTISMENT
|
• E-mail item • Print item • Comments • iPod friendly |
The $2.1 billion coal-fired John W. Turk Jr. power plant project under construction near Texarkana saw a major setback Wednesday as the Arkansas Court of Appeals unanimously rejected its approval by state utility regulators.
Subscribers must LOG-IN to read this full story.
Access is free for print subscribers who register. Online-only subscriptions are available. Click here to register.
Stories can also be purchased from the archives for $1.95 per article. » Click here to search the Archives. If your search doesn't return any results, contact the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette library at (501) 378-3851.
Front Section, Pages 1, 3 on 06/25/2009
SITE INDEX
-
- NEWS
- Arkansas
- Today's Newspaper
- Extras
- Obituaries
- Opinion / Letters
- Religion
- National
- Politics
- World
- Offbeat
- Living Green
- Archives
- Sister Papers
- E-mail Updates
- Weather
- BUSINESS
- Business
- Today's Newspaper
- Business wire
- Tech wire
- SPORTS
- Arkansas Sports
- Today's Newspaper
- Razorbacks
- LR Marathon
- High School News
- High School Football
- Recruiting Guy Blog
-
- Submit a Hole in One
- AP Sports
- College Football
- NFL
- NBA
- MLB
- PGA
- NASCAR
- Tennis
- ENTERTAINMENT
- Entertainment
- Weekend
- Events Calendar
- Movies
- Movie Finder
- Music
- Dining Out
- Restaurant Finder
- Today's Newspaper
- Travel
- Book Bytes
- Entertainment wire
- Comics
- Online games
- Sudoku
- TV listings
- WEB EXTRAS
- Video
- Photos for purchase
- Staff Galleries
-
- Community Photos
- Databases
- Blogs
- Polls
- Support Groups & Clubs
- Arkansas Links
- AP Photos
- AP Videos
- COMMUNITY NEWS
- Tri-Lakes Edition
- River Valley & Ozark Edition
- Three Rivers Edition
- SUBMISSIONS
- Honors & Achievements
- Bridal, engagements & anniversaries
- Calendar Events
- Support & Club meetings
- Letters to the Editor
- Submit a Hole in One
- News Tips
- SPECIAL FEATURES
- Features list
- Inauguration
- Previous News Features
- A Soldier's Wife
- War Casualties
- Central High: A Look Back
- Democrat-Gazette History
-
- CONTACT
- Forgotten Password?
- Advertising
- Corporate
- Newspaper Staff
- Website Staff
- Newspaper Delivery
- FAQ
- TARGETED PUBLICATIONS
- Sync
- Capture Arkansas
- Arkansas Life
- HerStyle
- Special Sections
- Taking New Patients
- Where We Live
- Downtown Little Rock
- Spelling Bee
- PROMOTIONS
- Bridal Show
- Contests
- Democrat-Gazette Store
- CLASSIFIEDS
- Classifieds
- Jobs
- Real Estate
- Auto
- Jobs with Us
- ADVERTISING
- Advertise with us

Comments
To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.
therobertwalker_hotmail.com says...
The Hempstead County site was chosen to meet the needs of Louisianna and Texas residents not Arkansas residents. It is downwind of those customers but upwind of most Arkansas residents.
June 26, 2009 at 5:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
therobertwalker_hotmail.com says...
The Hempstead County site was chosen to meet the needs of Louisiana and Texas residents not Arkansas residents. It is downwind of those customers but upwind of most Arkansas residents. The Hallsville, Texas site would have been cheaper if the power line cost were considered. They knew they could not roll over Texans.
June 26, 2009 at 5:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Login to comment
If you are already registered, click here to LOGIN.
You can register for FREE to post comments and receive alerts.