Subscribe Register Login
Sunday, June 24, 2018, 6:23 a.m.


Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

Court: Managers don’t have to ensure lunch breaks

By The Associated Press

This article was originally published April 12, 2012 at 9:56 a.m. Updated April 12, 2012 at 1:37 p.m.

— In a case that affects thousands of businesses and millions of workers, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that employers are under no obligation to ensure that workers take legally mandated lunch and rest breaks

The unanimous opinion came after workers’ attorneys argued that abuses are routine and widespread when companies aren’t required to issue direct orders to take the breaks. They claimed employers take advantage of workers who don’t want to leave colleagues during busy times.

The case was initially filed nine years ago against Brinker International, the parent company of Chili’s and other eateries, by restaurant workers complaining of missed breaks in violation of California labor law.

But the high court sided with businesses when it ruled that requiring companies to order breaks is unmanageable and those decisions should be left to workers.

The opinion written by Associate Justice Kathryn Werdegar explained that state law does not compel an employer to ensure employees cease all work during meal periods, instead saying the employee is at liberty to use the time as they choose.

“The employer is not obligated to police meal breaks and ensure no work thereafter is performed,” Werdegar wrote.

The court’s decision could greatly reduce the numerous class-action lawsuits surrounding the issue that cost companies millions of dollars in legal costs.

“The courts are making it clear that you have to create a system and a procedure that fully allows employees an opportunity to take breaks and meal periods, and if they do that they do not have to be Big Brother and individually monitor each employee to ensure that they’ve taken every bit of their breaks,” said Steve Hirschfeld, founder and CEO of the Employment Law Alliance, an employer-side legal trade group.

Attorneys for workers said low-wage workers such as those at Chili’s and other restaurants face unique issues that dissuade them from requesting meal and rest periods.

“The decision ... should have required employers to take affirmative steps to provide meal periods, and not just adopt policies that allow them,” Fernando Flores of the Legal Aid Society-Employment Law Center, said in a statement.

“The (court) previously held that employees who are denied their rest and meal periods face greater risk of work-related accidents — especially low-wage workers who engage in manual labor,” Flores said.

The Brinker decision doesn’t account for the public health and general welfare argument and weakens these standards for millions of low-wage workers across California, he added.

State law has mandated meal and rest breaks for decades. But in 2001, California became one of only a few states that impose a monetary penalty for employers who violate these laws, requiring employers to pay one hour of wages for a missed half-hour meal break. There is no federal law requiring employers to provide such breaks.


Comment on: Court: Managers don’t have to ensure lunch breaks

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 total comment

NONSHEEPLE says... April 12, 2012 at 2:01 p.m.

Those same companies give workers a hard time for taking their breaks if it's busy.

It was interesting when I worked in North Sacramento ER's a few years back. Someone was hired to come in and actually take my patient load while I took my break. It insured my patients actually got treatment and were monitored instead of "hoping" other workers wheren't too busy to look after your sick people.... It happens WAY MORE then any hospital admin will ever admit... It is a SAFETY thing... It reall does SUCK to come back from lunch and see dead people on cots that where breathing when you left them... Leaving co workers---who already have an enormous work load of their own-- to ensure your patients are covered as well is a bad risk... Arkansas is one of the WORST for making sure healthcare staff can get relief when needed..

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.





Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online