Justices consider whether health-care law can stand without mandate

Jonathan Neal, a senior at Howard University, plays his trumpet in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, on Wednesday, March 28, 2012, on the final day of arguments regarding the health care law signed by President Barack Obama.
Jonathan Neal, a senior at Howard University, plays his trumpet in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, on Wednesday, March 28, 2012, on the final day of arguments regarding the health care law signed by President Barack Obama.

— A day after debating the constitutionality of the heart of President Barack Obama’s health-care overhaul, the Supreme Court is turning to whether the rest of the law can survive if the crucial individual insurance requirement is struck down.

The justices also will spend part of Wednesday, the last of three days of arguments over the health law, considering a challenge by 26 states to the expansion of the Medicaid program for low-income Americans, an important feature toward the overall goal of extending health insurance to an additional 30 million people.

A big question before the court on Wednesday only comes into play if justices first find that the insurance mandate violates the Constitution. If they do, then they will have to decide if the rest of the law stands or falls.

The states and the small business group opposing the law say the insurance requirement is central to the whole undertaking and should take the rest of the law down with it.

The administration argues that the only other provisions the court should kill in the event the mandate is stricken are insurance revisions that require insurers to cover people regardless of existing medical problems and limit how much they can charge in premiums based on a person’s age or health.

Read tomorrow's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

Thank you for coming to the website of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. We're working to keep you informed with the latest breaking news.

Upcoming Events