Subscribe Register Login
Friday, April 27, 2018, 3:39 a.m.


Top Picks - Capture Arkansas

Judge hears testimony in 1976 murder case

By Gavin Lesnick

This article was published March 29, 2012 at 11:20 a.m.

— A judge is listening to testimony before considering whether newly discovered medical evidence that might call into question a 1976 murder conviction can be considered.

The hearing centers on Keith Allen Deaton, who was 18 when he pled guilty and was sentenced to life in prison in the murder of 26-year-old Linda Joan Reed. Deaton had hit Reed with a hammer during a burglary, but she died four weeks after the crime after being treated and released from the hospital.

U.S. District Judge Brian Miller must decide whether an appeal can be filed based on medical evidence suggesting other ailments - and not the attack with the hammer - caused Reed's death. The statute of limitations has expired, but a recent U.S. Supreme Court case might allow a claim if the original attorneys were neglectful.

Deaton's sister, Cynthia Houlroyd, testified Thursday that multiple doctors wrote letters that the attack was not the cause of Reed's death, but that Deaton's attorney at the time did not file an appeal when it was allowed.

Houlroyd said other attorneys had failed to obtain medical records and information despite clear questions in the case.

"It didn't make sense she could seem so well and then take a turn and die," Houlroyd said at one point. "We felt there was a strong indication ... Keith might not be guilty. We wanted to go to court and see what we could do."

Deaton's mother, Bonna Deaton, testified first, telling Miller that the family backed the guilty plea because her son's first attorney said he would likely otherwise be sentenced to death by the jury.

"We told him to because we wanted to save his life," she said, her voice shaky from crying.

Bonna Deaton said the family was promised a subsequent appeal was possible, though no details on how it would proceed were shared.

The three attorneys who represented Deaton before his current lawyer are expected to testify later Thursday.


Comment on: Judge hears testimony in 1976 murder case

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 total comment

TheBatt says... March 29, 2012 at 3:52 p.m.

Stepping outside the technicalities of the law - what was this thug's intent when he hit this woman in the head with a hammer? I'm sure it wasn't to make her into his best friend. His intent was to kill her.

Lets say that instead of hitting her in the head, he hit her in the leg. The leg was treated at the hospital, but then days later, a blood clot from that injury breaks loose and goes into her lungs or heart and causes death... wouldn't that still be a result of the assault, even though she appeared to be making a full recovery?

There is no question about his guilt - he burglarized the victim's home, then struck her in the head with a hammer intending to cause her death. Justice is done by him serving his sentence.

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.





Top Picks - Capture Arkansas
Arkansas Online