Subscribe Register Login

Thursday, August 21, 2014, 3:22 a.m.
Top Picks - Capture Arkansas

State open-records law ruling before high court

By The Associated Press

This article was published November 29, 2012 at 11:03 a.m.

— An attorney for a west Arkansas city says the state Supreme Court should order legislators to define what constitutes a meeting under the state’s Freedom of Information act after a judge ruled part of the law was unconstitutional.

Justices heard arguments Thursday over a Sebastian County judge’s ruling that struck down the law’s criminal penalty.

Arguments focused more on whether a series of one-one-one meetings between a city administrator and board members constituted a meeting.

Fort Smith City Attorney Jerry Canfield said the law is too vague on what constitutes a meeting and said justices should tell the Legislature to define it. An attorney for Joey McCutchen, who had sued the city, said the one-on-one meetings undermined the law by allowing an administrator to secretly pitch an ordinance to directors.

Comments on: State open-records law ruling before high court

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

TOP JOBS

  • Electrical maintenance

    ppg ppg Protective and Marine Coatings Bringing innovation t...
    Little Rock, AR

  • Clinic director

    clinic director uams South Central in Pine Bluff is seeking ...
    PINE BLUFF, AR

  • Finish heavy equipme

    Redstone Construction Group has the following positions avai...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Executive assistant

    national food marketing company is seeking person to Suppor...
    BENTONVILLE, Arkansas

  • Sales rep

    fairfield bay area need a fulltime salesperson in russellvi...
    Little Rock, AR

Search 891 jobs >

Top Picks - Capture Arkansas
Arkansas Online