Subscribe Register Login

Wednesday, October 01, 2014, 5:34 p.m.
Top Picks - Mobile App

State open-records law ruling before high court

By The Associated Press

This article was published November 29, 2012 at 11:03 a.m.

— An attorney for a west Arkansas city says the state Supreme Court should order legislators to define what constitutes a meeting under the state’s Freedom of Information act after a judge ruled part of the law was unconstitutional.

Justices heard arguments Thursday over a Sebastian County judge’s ruling that struck down the law’s criminal penalty.

Arguments focused more on whether a series of one-one-one meetings between a city administrator and board members constituted a meeting.

Fort Smith City Attorney Jerry Canfield said the law is too vague on what constitutes a meeting and said justices should tell the Legislature to define it. An attorney for Joey McCutchen, who had sued the city, said the one-on-one meetings undermined the law by allowing an administrator to secretly pitch an ordinance to directors.

Comments on: State open-records law ruling before high court

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

TOP JOBS

  • Life skill tech

    Saturday & Sunday 6a-6:30p. Direct care. Experience in long ...
    NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Internists

    Hospitalists () to provide medical servicesLittle Rock, AR. ...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Park interpreter

    Bull Shoals White River State Park, Lake View, AR Position ...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Computer tech

    The Carlisle School District is looking for: network adminis...
    CARLISLE, AR

  • Dietary assistant

    dietary assistantlocal retirement center seeking dependable ...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

Search 945 jobs >

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online