Subscribe Register Login

Saturday, December 20, 2014, 5 p.m.
Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

State open-records law ruling before high court

By The Associated Press

This article was published November 29, 2012 at 11:03 a.m.

— An attorney for a west Arkansas city says the state Supreme Court should order legislators to define what constitutes a meeting under the state’s Freedom of Information act after a judge ruled part of the law was unconstitutional.

Justices heard arguments Thursday over a Sebastian County judge’s ruling that struck down the law’s criminal penalty.

Arguments focused more on whether a series of one-one-one meetings between a city administrator and board members constituted a meeting.

Fort Smith City Attorney Jerry Canfield said the law is too vague on what constitutes a meeting and said justices should tell the Legislature to define it. An attorney for Joey McCutchen, who had sued the city, said the one-on-one meetings undermined the law by allowing an administrator to secretly pitch an ordinance to directors.

Comments on: State open-records law ruling before high court

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

TOP JOBS

  • Natural gas compressor mechanic

    needed in Conway/Morrilton area. Must be able to pass drug/a...
    OZARK, AR

  • Office assistant ii

    north little rock wastewater utility salary and excellent b...
    Little Rock, AR

  • Productionteamleader

    Production Team Leader - 2nd or 3rd shiftLeads team members ...
    RUSSELLVILLE, AR

  • Carriers

    carriers wanted Make extra money delivering the arkansas dem...
    Searcy, AR

  • Plumbers

    and combination welders at Comfort Systems USA (Arkansas) I...
    FORT SMITH, AR

Search 742 jobs >

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online