Subscribe Register Login

Monday, December 22, 2014, 3:23 p.m.
Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

Editorials

Maintain radio silence

Welcome to Little Rock, Chief!

This article was published August 4, 2014 at 3:17 a.m.

Robert Redford found Dustin Hoffman rewriting his copy in All The President’s Men, and didn’t much cotton to it. (If memory serves, they were playing two newspaper types of some note.) Call it the vanity of newsmen, and it’s not pretty. At one point, Robert Redford’s character quietly tells his partner: I don’t mind what you did, I mind the way you did it.

Which is the way a lot of folks in Little Rock may feel when it comes to this whole encryption thing out of police headquarters. It might not be the worst thing ever, but, boy, you’d think Little Rock’s finest could’ve handled it better.

The police in the state’s largest force have now gone quiet. Eerily quiet. The newsroom scanners and even the traffic monitors in many a local household no longer chatter. Little Rock’s police department has encrypted most of its communications—and unless the cops are talking to another city employee in another department, those who Serve and Protect us are maintaining radio silence when it comes to the served and protected. We the mere people are now to be kept in the dark about what’s going on as it goes on.

The cops, or at least their spokesmen, say it’s all being done in the interest of public safety. Because nowadays there are apps that the bad guys can employ on their smart phones to find out when busts might be made. And that development, the spokesmen say, could get one of the good guys hurt.

Besides, those spokesmen say, other police departments in the state encrypt their communications, too. Which may be the worst argument for Little Rock’s doing the same. It seems a little too Johnny’s-mother-says-it’s-okay for a discussion between adults.

The bigger problem might be the way this was all done. That is, quietly. Little Rock’s city manager told the papers that encryption was “always on the table” when the new radio equipment was put in. But he might have been more accurate if he’d said the whole encryption business was done under the table.

Not only are the media bent out of shape. Not only are those concerned citizens who try to keep up with local crime, and share their reports on social media, yelling about this black-out. When the new encryption rules were finally announced, some city directors were taken by surprise, too. One of them, Stacy Hurst, said she worked for the sales tax increase in 2011 in part to upgrade the police department’s radio equipment. But encryption? “I worked hard to get it passed, and I don’t recall [encryption] being discussed. I do not recall it being a talking point. Was it in the fine print somewhere? I can’t say for sure.”

Adds another city director, Lance Hines: “I think everyone’s scratching their heads going, ‘How did we get from here to there?’ ”

Little Rock’s city directors might do well to take up this not so little matter at their next meeting. For they seem to have questions. And other questions need raising. Such as:

—Shouldn’t the public be able to hear what those responsible for our safety are saying to each other? And shouldn’t the public be able to keep up with crimes in their neighborhoods? Even and maybe especially while they’re being committed?

—Wasn’t public money spent to upgrade these police radios? Is spending public money to keep the public in the dark really the best way to keep officers safe?

—What happens next time some officer of the law abuses a private citizen and is so indiscreet as to refer to it on his police radio? That happens, you know. Now, when the courts or just some inky wretches of the press begin looking into the case, will they find all the evidence has been encrypted?

—And if encryption was “always on the table,” then how come nobody saw it sitting there? Why is the public just now hearing about it? Or was that information encrypted, too?

Little Rock’s new police chief, Kenton Buckner, has been on the job, oh, about a month now. Welcome to Little Rock, Chief. Around these parts, people take their public information, and access to it, seriously. Even if it’s just two cops talking about a stalled car on the interstate.

More than that, though, folks around here don’t like things being put over on them ever so quietly. They prefer their public officials to stay public. That is, open and above-board and with due notice given and public hearing held before any important change is made in public policy. Citizens don’t like things hidden in fine print. Or even encrypted.

Can the scrambler—or whatever gizmo is used in encryption—be turned off, and the radio chatter resumed with a push of the button? That’s still another question Little Rock’s city directors should ask—in public—at their next meeting. Some of us can’t wait.

Print Headline: Mantain radio silence

Comment on: Maintain radio silence

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 total comment

Nodmcm says... August 4, 2014 at 11:18 a.m.

That 2011 sales tax increase might have been defeated, had the public known that the additional funding would lead to encryption of police radio traffic. Because city leaders knew it would upset many members of the public, they kept it in the dark until virtually the day the radio traffic was encrypted. Actually, you have to hand it to the Little Rock city leaders, for manipulating the public so adroitly. They got the extra tax money they wanted, and then they used it to foil the public's 'right to listen' to police radio traffic. Ultimately, this is the sort of patronizing governmental management style that makes so many people 'anti-government,' and I do not refer solely to conservatives, either. It kind of makes one wish that the city board would perhaps cut the police budget by, say, twenty percent until they disconnect the encryption and go back to an 'open system.' But we all know that will never happen. At least the police should be very happy with their secret communication system. I truly hope it really does keep them safer, so there will be a commensurate benefit to offset the loss to the public of the real-time information obtained by listening to a police scanner.

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

TOP JOBS

  • Horticulture

    Hope Nursery, LLC dba Country Pines Nursery, Forest Hill, LA...
    ALEXANDRIA, LA

  • Assistant hardware

    asst hardware store mgr $20-25k. Pd holidays & vacEnd of yea...
    BENTON, AR

  • Medical

    Currently has openings for the following positions:1Register...
    HELENA, AR

  • Mainframe architect

    mainframe architect leads Leads in Bentonville, AR area. Ga...
    BENTONVILLE, AR

  • Electrical maintenance

    PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Bringing innovation to th...
    Little Rock, AR

Search 681 jobs >

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online