Subscribe Register Login

Sunday, September 21, 2014, 5:19 p.m.
Top Picks - Mobile App

Drug firms argue against Risperdal judgment

By The Associated Press

This article was originally published February 27, 2014 at 7:07 a.m. Updated February 27, 2014 at 10:28 a.m.

LITTLE ROCK — A lawyer for two drug companies told the Arkansas Supreme Court that the state improperly relied on federal regulations in a lawsuit that resulted in a $1.2 billion award over the companies' marketing of an antipsychotics drug.

The state's attorneys countered during Thursday's hearing before the high court that Johnson & Johnson and a subsidiary were properly penalized for improper marketing of the drug Risperdal.

A Pulaski County jury ruled against the companies in 2012.

The companies also argued that the state brought the case under a Medicaid fraud law when there was no indications of improper reimbursements.

Sixty-five legislators filed a friend of the court brief saying the law was properly applied.

Johnson & Johnson separately agreed to a $2.2 billion federal settlement on similar claims.

Comments on: Drug firms argue against Risperdal judgment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

TOP JOBS

  • Front desk clerk

    front desk clerk Days Inn, Prothro Junction. Now hiring full...
    NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Sales

    HELLO!We Need Independent Representatives Earning Potential...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Carriers

    carriers wanted potential monthly earnings from $1,000 to $1...
    Beebe, AR

  • Eye clinic

    Camp Eye Care hiring clerical position. Exp. a plus. Some Sa...
    SEARCY, AR

  • Vascular sonographer

    Assistant Professor of NeurosurgeryUAMS to fill Asst. Prof. ...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

Search 1149 jobs >

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online