Subscribe Register Login

Wednesday, August 20, 2014, 5:37 p.m.
Top Picks - Mobile App

Drug firms argue against Risperdal judgment

By The Associated Press

This article was originally published February 27, 2014 at 7:07 a.m. Updated February 27, 2014 at 10:28 a.m.

LITTLE ROCK — A lawyer for two drug companies told the Arkansas Supreme Court that the state improperly relied on federal regulations in a lawsuit that resulted in a $1.2 billion award over the companies' marketing of an antipsychotics drug.

The state's attorneys countered during Thursday's hearing before the high court that Johnson & Johnson and a subsidiary were properly penalized for improper marketing of the drug Risperdal.

A Pulaski County jury ruled against the companies in 2012.

The companies also argued that the state brought the case under a Medicaid fraud law when there was no indications of improper reimbursements.

Sixty-five legislators filed a friend of the court brief saying the law was properly applied.

Johnson & Johnson separately agreed to a $2.2 billion federal settlement on similar claims.

Comments on: Drug firms argue against Risperdal judgment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

TOP JOBS

  • Finish heavy equipme

    Redstone Construction Group has the following positions avai...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Education

    pulaski technical college in North Little Rock, Arkansas, th...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Class a cdl driver

    class a cdl drivers - ar co. hiring safe drivers w/2 yr min....
    BRYANT, AR

  • Cnc operator

    fm corporation cnc operator (Sulphur Springs, ar) position s...
    SULPHUR SPRINGS, AR

  • R&r transmission technician

    R and r transmission technician Full-time position at clean,...
    SPRINGDALE, AR

Search 882 jobs >

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online