Subscribe Register Login

Monday, September 01, 2014, 6:34 p.m.
Top Picks - Capture Arkansas

Drug firms argue against Risperdal judgment

By The Associated Press

This article was originally published February 27, 2014 at 7:07 a.m. Updated February 27, 2014 at 10:28 a.m.

LITTLE ROCK — A lawyer for two drug companies told the Arkansas Supreme Court that the state improperly relied on federal regulations in a lawsuit that resulted in a $1.2 billion award over the companies' marketing of an antipsychotics drug.

The state's attorneys countered during Thursday's hearing before the high court that Johnson & Johnson and a subsidiary were properly penalized for improper marketing of the drug Risperdal.

A Pulaski County jury ruled against the companies in 2012.

The companies also argued that the state brought the case under a Medicaid fraud law when there was no indications of improper reimbursements.

Sixty-five legislators filed a friend of the court brief saying the law was properly applied.

Johnson & Johnson separately agreed to a $2.2 billion federal settlement on similar claims.

Comments on: Drug firms argue against Risperdal judgment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

TOP JOBS

  • Instructors

    The University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR), located in...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Industrialmechanic

    industrial maintenancegeneral mechanic Green Bay Packaging I...
    MORRILTON, AR

  • Outside sales representatives

    Needed! - 25 Hour Work Week - 3:00pm to 8:00pm Monday-Frida...
    Little Rock, AR

  • Foreman

    Established HVAC Construction Company is interviewing for Su...
    ROGERS, AR

  • Hr/payroll

    is currently accepting applications for:•Director of Campus ...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

Search 914 jobs >

Top Picks - Capture Arkansas
Arkansas Online