Subscribe Register Login

Sunday, December 21, 2014, 7:33 a.m.
Top Picks - Capture Arkansas

Obamacare hit by ruling, but subsidies to continue

By The Associated Press

This article was originally published July 22, 2014 at 9:48 a.m. Updated July 22, 2014 at 1:09 p.m.

president-barack-obama-speaks-about-the-my-brothers-keeper-initiative-at-the-walker-jones-education-campus-in-washington-on-monday-july-21-2014-a-us-appeals-court-has-delivered-a-serious-setback-to-president-obamas-health-care-law-potentially-derailing-subsidies-for-many-low-and-middle-income-people-who-have-bought-policies

President Barack Obama speaks about the My Brother’s Keeper Initiative, at the Walker Jones Education Campus in Washington on Monday, July 21, 2014. A U.S. appeals court has delivered a serious setback to President Obama's health care law, potentially derailing subsidies for many low-and middle-income people who have bought policies.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care law is enmeshed in another big legal battle after two federal appeals courts issued contradictory rulings on a key financing issue within hours of each other Tuesday.

A divided court panel in Washington called into question the subsidies that help millions of low- and middle-income people pay their premiums, saying financial aid can be paid only in states that have set up their own insurance markets, or exchanges.

About 100 miles to the south in Richmond, Va., another appeals court panel unanimously came to the opposite conclusion, ruling that the Internal Revenue Service correctly interpreted the will of Congress when it issued regulations allowing consumers in all 50 states to purchase subsidized coverage.

The White House immediately declared that policyholders will keep getting financial aid as the administration sorts out the legal implications.

Spokesman Josh Earnest said the adverse decision in Washington would have "no practical impact" on tax credits as the case works its way through the courts.

Both cases are part of a long-running political and legal campaign to overturn Obama's signature domestic legislation by Republicans and other opponents of the law.

Comments on: Obamacare hit by ruling, but subsidies to continue

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 41 total comments

Jump to last page >>

RoyDaMercer says... July 22, 2014 at 10:14 a.m.

Oh darn; how are we going to insure all of these immigrants flooding into our country!

( | suggest removal )

Dontcallmenames says... July 22, 2014 at 11:41 a.m.

The press secretary just basically said screw the law and what the court said, we're going to keep giving subsidies. All hail El Presidente...he knows best!

( | suggest removal )

SUPERDUTY says... July 22, 2014 at 1:17 p.m.

Why is he and his cohorts not in jail? How are they crapping on the Constitution and Bill of Rights and getting away with it?

( | suggest removal )

DontDrinkDatKoolAid says... July 22, 2014 at 1:39 p.m.

What? There's a rule of Law?

( | suggest removal )

AmericasDoomed says... July 22, 2014 at 1:46 p.m.

Yes, but only with legal Americans. If you're an illegal alien or work for the Obama administration then the laws don't apply.

( | suggest removal )

carpenterretired says... July 22, 2014 at 1:51 p.m.

Republicans have worked to get rid of social security since FDR and failed, they have worked to get rid of Medicare since LBJ and failed now they keep working to get rid of the ACA which is the greatest healing of the sick and ministering to the poor since Medicare will they fail again?

( | suggest removal )

djigoo says... July 22, 2014 at 2:07 p.m.

Desperate move by a desperate party with a failed agenda.

Nothing new.

( | suggest removal )

Got2Kids says... July 22, 2014 at 2:38 p.m.

I think the point is not so much about the ACA, but about summarily deciding that you will NOT comply with an order of the court. The Executive branch cannot applaud certain court rulings and then decide not to follow those they don't like, period. It is not a two way street. Federal judges made this ruling, not Dems or Repubs. Praising or blaming either party for it is ridiculous. As for the ACA, no matter what side you are on it will be a few more years before the Dems can claim success or the Repubs can claim it to be a failure.

( | suggest removal )

3rdWorldState says... July 22, 2014 at 3:01 p.m.

See Pat, this is what I was talking about. Wacko Fringe nutjobs retorts. Respectfully.

( | suggest removal )

tenpoint says... July 22, 2014 at 3:07 p.m.

if the congress had their head screwed on right they would not have voted for this mess of so called insurance. it is a disgrace for congress to pass this.

( | suggest removal )

Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

TOP JOBS

  • Ceo

    Chief Executive OfficerArkansas One-Call & ARKUPS, based in ...
    CONWAY, AR

  • Emp service coord

    university of arkansas at little rockdepartment of human res...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Receptionist

    receptionist/staff asstsm. WLR law office; good people skill...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Manager

    Materials & Logistics Responsible for the planning, organizi...
    CONWAY, AR

  • Occupational therapi

    occupational therapist - Pulaski County Special School Distr...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

Search 866 jobs >

Top Picks - Capture Arkansas
Arkansas Online