Subscribe Register Login

Monday, July 28, 2014, 1:51 p.m.
Top Picks - Mobile App

McDaniel defines stance on pending egg lawsuit

By The Associated Press

This article was published March 25, 2014 at 1:57 p.m.

Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel says it's not appropriate for the state to join a Missouri lawsuit that challenges California restrictions on egg production, but he supports the border state's efforts.

McDaniel said Tuesday that California rules that ban importation of eggs from hens kept in cages smaller than a certain size don't affect Arkansas producers because they already meet the guidelines.

But, McDaniel said, he supports the Missouri lawsuit because one state should not be able to cause harm to another state's agriculture production.

Arkansas produces about 1 billion eggs per year, but only a small portion is shipped to California.

The attorney general said California's restrictions appear to violate the Commerce Clause.

McDaniel said he may file a friend of the court brief in support of Missouri's challenge.

Comments on: McDaniel defines stance on pending egg lawsuit

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 total comments

smbatark says... March 25, 2014 at 4:36 p.m.

Attorney General McDaniel is sorely wrong. The "majority" of commercial egg producers in the the state of Arkansas do not meet the requirement for California Egg production. Those requirements state that a chicken must have 116 sq/in per bird and be able to turn and spread their wings without any obstructions. To meet those guidelines, most egg producers will need to spend millions of dollars in housing and equipment upgrades.

( | suggest removal )

RBBrittain says... March 26, 2014 at 1:40 a.m.

@smbatark: Try reading the WHOLE article. It doesn't matter to "most egg producers" in Arkansas as they do NOT sell their eggs to California; the ones that do may meet the standards already. Our lame-duck AG has bigger fish (or roosters) to fry...

( | suggest removal )

TheBatt says... March 26, 2014 at 2:07 p.m.

McDaniel and his political aspirations...

He is right in one way - the California law/rule does violate the Commerce clause. But this particular issue doesn't have any political points to score for his aspirations, so he isn't "wasting his time".

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

TOP JOBS

  • Salesperson

    russellville, searcy areas need one salesperson (woman/man) ...
    Little Rock, AR

  • Lpns

    3-11 shiftPRN all shiftsLTC exp. preferredApply in person ...
    JACKSONVILLE, AR

  • Medical technologist

    ft- very competitive pay and benefits! Northeastern Nevada ...
    Elko, NV

  • Drivers

    class a cdl Drivers with 2 yrs experience and clean driving...
    Little Rock, AR

  • Finish heavy equipme

    Redstone Construction Group has the following positions avai...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

Search 893 jobs >

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online