Subscribe Register Login

Wednesday, March 29, 2017, 10:36 a.m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Mobile App

Ballot proposal on term limits submitted

By Danielle Kloap

This article was published June 11, 2015 at 10:52 a.m.

patricia-mays-of-monticello-speaks-at-an-arkansas-term-limits-news-conference-thursday-june-11-2015-as-tim-jacobs-left-and-paul-spencer-look-on

Patricia Mays of Monticello speaks at an Arkansas Term Limits news conference Thursday, June 11, 2015, as Tim Jacobs, left, and Paul Spencer look on.

A group wanting to restore stricter term limits for state legislators on Thursday submitted a constitutional amendment ballot proposal to Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge.

Speakers at a news conference conducted by Arkansas Term Limits expressed concern about the term limit increases passed in Issue 3, now Amendment 94 to the Arkansas Constitution, in 2014. The amendment meant legislators can serve up to 16 years, up from 10 years previously.

Arkansas Term Limits presented the proposed ballot title for the amendment, "Arkansas Term Limits of 2016." Rutledge has to approve the ballot title before the group can gather about 82,000 signatures from registered voters to get the amendment on the 2016 general election ballot.

The proposed amendment would restore the 10-year term limits.

Tim Jacobs, co-chairman of Arkansas Term Limits, said this ballot proposal would not have the "deception" of Issue 3 and that he's confident the group will be able to collect the required signatures to get the amendment on the 2016 ballot.

"It's important to know this issue crosses all party and demographic lines," Jacobs said. "It's supported by people in the state. On the ballot it will say term limits and will describe to the voters of the state exactly what it does."

Patricia Mays, a Monticello resident, said at the news conference that Issue 3 confused voters because it also rolled in provisions about legislative ethics.

"People voted for Issue 3 thinking that it was an ethics amendment and actually there were some ethic provisions buried in a 22-page bill, along with a few lines to destroy term limits," Mays said. "We need to take back our government and let the legislators know they work for us, we are the bosses."

Paul Spencer, leader of citizens group Regnat Populus, said he spearheaded Issue 3 originally to create a "meaningful ethics law" by reining in gifts and meals legislators could accept from lobbyists.

"We gave the legislature a little latitude, and they abused that," Spencer said. "[Legislators] are going to have to be held accountable, though."

If Rutledge approves the ballot title, the group will have until July 2016 to get the required signatures for the amendment to appear on the November ballot.

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments on: Ballot proposal on term limits submitted

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 total comments

llllllll says... June 11, 2015 at 11:41 a.m.

where do I sign

( | suggest removal )

RBBrittain says... June 11, 2015 at 12:23 p.m.

I agree with your sentiment -- I voted against Issue 3 because, after reading it, I felt its ethics provisions were a smokescreen for BOTH a pay grab AND undermining term limits -- but we have to wait for AG Rutledge to approve the ballot title before we can sign. I might have favored the term-limits change if presented separately, but under the circumstances I not only would likely support a rollback proposal (I'd have to read this one first, just like Issue 3), but also wish it would roll back the pay grab as well!

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

ADVERTISEMENT

SHOPPING

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online