Sides heard in Florida 911-call suit

ORLANDO, Fla.-- An attorney for media companies seeking the release of dozens of 911 calls from the mass shooting at a Florida nightclub argued before a U.S. district judge Thursday that it's a matter for the state courts to decide.

Rachel Fugate, representing The Associated Press and several other media groups including The New York Times and CNN, argued before U.S. District Judge Paul Byron that the FBI and Department of Justice have no place in the case. Fugate argued that the fight between the media and the city over the 911 calls should be returned from the federal system to the state level.

Byron listened to all sides Thursday, including the Justice Department. He didn't immediately rule on whether he would hear the case or send it to the state level, only saying his decision would come "in short order."

The recordings sought also include communications between gunman Omar Mateen and the Orlando Police Department during the attack on Orlando's Pulse nightclub that killed 49 people and wounded 53 others. Mateen was killed by police early June 12 after a lengthy standoff at the club.

Separately, Darryl Bloodworth, the attorney for the city, was allowed to speak uninterrupted for 15 minutes during the hearing.

The city, which is the custodian of the recordings, claims they are exempt under Florida public-records law and that the FBI insists releasing them may disrupt the continuing investigation. Bloodworth argued that the city is caught in the middle of the dispute between the federal investigation and the news media's demand to have all of the 911 records.

The media groups filed a complaint in state court about 10 days after the shooting, seeking the release of the recordings. Less than hour after that, the city filed a complaint in state court, asking that the recordings be declared exempt from public-records law.

In a legal maneuver, the city filed an amended lawsuit, naming the Justice Department as a defendant, and department attorneys moved for the case to be transferred to federal court -- where Florida's public-records law isn't applicable.

In court papers, the Justice Department argues the recordings are federal records and not subject to Florida's records law.

The media companies argue that the Justice Department is "one of perhaps many parties standing on the sidelines" and that aren't a proper party to the lawsuit.

A Section on 08/19/2016

Upcoming Events