O'Malley as spoiler a possibility

Process gives his backers some leverage on who wins Iowa

Democrat Martin O’Malley, former governor of Maryland, said he is hoping his schedule and organization over the past months will allow him to “beat expectations” during Monday’s Iowa caucuses.
Democrat Martin O’Malley, former governor of Maryland, said he is hoping his schedule and organization over the past months will allow him to “beat expectations” during Monday’s Iowa caucuses.

BURLINGTON, Iowa -- Because of the nature of the caucus process in Iowa, supporters of former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley hold some cards in determining whether Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders wins the first contest of the nominating season.



RELATED ARTICLES

http://www.arkansas…">GOP chief: Trump to set record http://www.arkansas…">Of Clinton emails, 22 blocked as 'top secret' http://www.arkansas…">Caucuses Monday, hopefuls add heat, go on the defensive

Voting in the Iowa caucuses is far more complicated than it is in states where a voter can simply walk into a polling booth at any point on election day and cast a ballot.

On Monday, Democrats will gather with friends and neighbors at 7 p.m. in 1,681 precincts -- schools, libraries and community centers -- across the state. After supporters give speeches on behalf of their preferred candidates, the caucus attendees will move to different corners of the room, based upon which candidate they back. An initial count will be taken to see how many supporters each candidate has.

If a candidate does not get the backing of 15 percent of the voters in a precinct, the candidate is deemed not "viable," and that campaign's supporters have a half-hour to move on to their second choice. That sets off a scramble of cajoling, lobbying and soft-scale enticements as supporters of rival candidates woo the up-for-grabs voters.

"It's like playful bribing, like 'c'mon, I'll mow your lawn,'" joked Sam Lau, spokesman for the Iowa Democratic Party. More often, he said, it's "what issues are most important to you? Let me talk to you about that."

With Clinton and Sanders in a close race and O'Malley mired in the single digits in the polls, "it really could come down to where those O'Malley people go," said Brad Anderson, a Democratic strategist and Clinton supporter. "The importance of those voters cannot be overstated."

O'Malley and his supporters say that if they fail to reach viability in the first round, their first effort will be to try to persuade Clinton and Sanders backers to join them during the reshuffling.

"My schedule over the last eight months has been all about putting together the organization that will hold firm on caucus night and allow us to beat expectations," O'Malley said in an interview after a visit to a union hall in Burlington. "It will be a viability battle in every precinct, and our goal is to win that battle in as many as possible."

It may seem counterintuitive for a supporter of a viable candidate to switch to a rival campaign, but it can be strategic. Each precinct has a fixed number of delegates to allocate among the viable candidates. In certain situations, Sanders or Clinton supporters might be able to deny a delegate to the rival campaign by throwing enough support to O'Malley to make him viable in a precinct.

Sallee Garst Haerr, an O'Malley precinct captain in Fairfield, has already begun drawing up lists of Sanders and Clinton supporters she hopes she can peel away if O'Malley is only a few supporters short of viability.

"Part of being an organizer is having strategies," said the 62-year-old website builder. "It's really a question of numbers."

In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama's backers are widely believed to have worked with supporters of John Edwards to keep him viable as a way of denying delegates to Clinton. The tactic was partly responsible for her third-place finish in the caucuses that year, said David Yepsen, the director of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University.

"It was a pretty sophisticated maneuver, the neatest trick I've seen in the caucus," said Yepsen, who covered politics for the Des Moines Register for 34 years.

The Sanders and Clinton campaigns did not respond to requests for comment about their second-choice strategies.

Such analysis can be difficult to do on the fly. And O'Malley supporters concede that it is pointless if he has no realistic shot of reaching viability in their precincts.

"If it looks like I'm the only person, then I have to decide" between Sanders and Clinton, said Haerr. "I'm kind of undecided [on my second choice]. I'm leaning toward Hillary."

She is already facing pressure from supporters of other candidates, including in her home. Her husband is a Clinton supporter, while her daughter backs Sanders.

Several voters said they would select their second choice after hearing the candidates' supporters make their case at the caucus.

"I'll listen to what they have to say and decide then," said Jamie Dockendorff, a 24-year-old software engineer who supports O'Malley. But she held out hope that she would be able to caucus for O'Malley on Monday night.

"We're going to talk to both the Hillary Clinton and Sanders people in the room and say, 'Hey, you'd rather us have delegates than your opponent, so give us some of your people,'" she said, adding that they were counting on the fact that the top two candidates do not view O'Malley as a threat. "They don't believe we'll actually do anything, so they're perfectly fine with it."

A Section on 01/30/2016

Upcoming Events