Subscribe Register Login
Sunday, April 22, 2018, 11:38 a.m.


Top Picks - Mobile App

Firm asked state not to use drug in executions months before 'donation,' letters show

By CLAUDIA LAUER, The Associated Press

This article was originally published April 21, 2017 at 11:24 a.m. Updated April 21, 2017 at 2:39 p.m.

A drugmaker asked Arkansas officials not to purchase its products for executions months before the state accepted a third-party "donation" of potassium chloride as one of three drugs to use in lethal injections, according to letters obtained by The Associated Press.

Fresenius Kabi USA wrote to Department of Correction Director Wendy Kelley and other officials last July saying the company was aware Arkansas wanted to buy drugs to carry out executions and asking the state not to violate contracts between Fresenius and its distributors that forbid the distributors from selling the drugmaker's products for use in capital punishment.

Fresenius has since identified itself as the possible maker of the Arkansas' supply of potassium chloride — which Kelley recently testified she obtained by driving to an undisclosed location to meet an unnamed distributor, who when told about the billing process chose to "donate" it rather than create a record of the sale.

Legal and pharmaceutical experts said the methods Arkansas used to obtain the potassium chloride, midazolam and vecuronium bromide to resume carrying out its first executions since 2005 raise concerns about the state's respect for contracts between private businesses.

Arkansas carried out an execution Thursday using the drugs after the state Supreme Court reversed a judge's order that had halted the use of the vecuronium bromide. The ruling came in an unprecedented lawsuit from drug distributor McKesson Corp., which alleged state officials misled the company when purchasing its supply of vecuronium bromide last July by using a physician's license number that implied the drug would be used only for medically approved purposes.

The state had planned to use the drugs in four double executions over an 11-day period in April. The eight executions would have been the most by a state in such a compressed period since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976. The state said the executions needed to be carried out before its supply of the sedative midazolam expires on April 30. Three executions were canceled because of court decisions, and court rulings have put at least one other in doubt.

The state has refused to answer questions about the drug suppliers, including whether the Department of Correction received Fresenius' letters, citing a law that keeps the drug sources secret. However, at a court hearing on the McKesson lawsuit, department deputy director Rory Griffin said he did tell a McKesson salesman about the intended purpose of the drug.

A spokeswoman for McKesson didn't immediately return a request for comment Friday. Representatives for Fresenius and Hikma Pharmaceuticals — the parent company for West-Ward, which the AP identified in 2015 as the likely maker of Arkansas' midazolam — said they don't know for sure that the state used their products because Arkansas officials won't answer their questions.

"If the State of Arkansas was able to procure any of our U.S.-manufactured drugs for use in lethal injections despite these controls - which it will not confirm or deny to us - it was not directly from us, nor with our knowledge," Hikma Pharmaceuticals spokeswoman Brooke Clarke wrote. "We have made our objections to the misuse of any of our products for lethal injection known to the governors, attorneys general and departments of correction in every state with capital punishment."

According to Fresenius' July letter, use of its drugs in executions could result in stricter regulations from the European Union, which bans the export of drugs used in lethal injections. Fresenius spokesman Matt Kuhn confirmed that President and CEO John Ducker wrote the letter as well as another sent in 2016 and one sent in recent weeks.

"We would like the Arkansas Department of Correction to destroy or return any product of ours they may have," Kuhn said, adding the company did not have immediate plans for further legal action.


Comments on: Firm asked state not to use drug in executions months before 'donation,' letters show

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 total comments

TheBatt says... April 21, 2017 at 12:35 p.m.

Why can we not simplify the whole process the Suoreme Court has ruled that hanging is 100% constitutional. So let's build a gallows and hang the condemned. Far cheaper, no pharmesuitcal company headaches, and immediate results.

( | suggest removal )

gagewatcher says... April 21, 2017 at 12:48 p.m.

bullet to the back of the head quick and cheap.

( | suggest removal )

RBBrittain says... April 21, 2017 at 1:45 p.m.

Why not rule those EU regulations an illegal restraint of international trade and interference in U.S. sovereignty? I'm ambivalent about the death penalty itself, but IMO the EU and drug manufacturers have NO business telling THIS country how to execute prisoners. (I would have agreed with AG Rutledge on the McKesson lawsuit, but I had bigger problems with her using a 2017 law to attempt an unconstitutional change of venue to Faulkner County, a location with ZERO relevance to that case!)

( | suggest removal )

USA1 says... April 21, 2017 at 5:42 p.m.

Seems like ethics or respect for business law have little regard as the diabolical governor rushes to kill. Apparently he won't get to be a serial killer like he wanted to. The have been very underhanded in this and it does not reflect well on the ethics of the Arkansas government. Of course, the attorney general kept people working 24/7 - on Easter - to get the killings going. They are disgusting.

( | suggest removal )

AGG says... April 21, 2017 at 7:41 p.m.

In case you wondered, a few details about Marcel William's crime are being left out. Let this sink in: Williams abducted a 22 year old mother of two on her way to work and raped her. Then for three days, he took her from to crack house after crack house wherein she was gang raped numerous times by other crack heads and in exchange, Marcel Williams received crack. When Williams tired of the victim, he took her to an area near a river and buried her alive blind folded and bound with duct tape. She suffocated from inhaling vast amounts of dirt into her lungs as she fought to stay alive. It's only fair all the facts come out about this as Williams, his lawyers and many misguided individuals lament at how terrible Governor Hutchinson and Attorney General Rutledge are.

( | suggest removal )

AuntPetunia says... April 21, 2017 at 8:53 p.m.

USA, the state officials are not serial killers. They are upholding the LAW. Where were you and all the other protestors during the last 12 years of legislative sessions? Why were you not petitioning that branch of the government to change the LAW? Did you know that is their job?

For the record, I am against the death penalty, but I cannot stand the manipulation, emotional hysteria, and character assassinations perpetrated by anti-death penalty zealots who are too lazy to change the law through proper channels.

( | suggest removal )

NoCrossNoCrown says... April 21, 2017 at 10:51 p.m.

If these men had been wealthy or from wealthy families,
the death penalty NEVER would have been on the table...
UNEQUAL JUSTICE: The favored Sin of the powerful and well connected

( | suggest removal )

AuntPetunia says... April 21, 2017 at 11:59 p.m.

The death penalty is capricious, arbitrary, and more likely to be applied to minorities and the poor. I would support legislation to abolish it.

( | suggest removal )

RBear says... April 22, 2017 at 4:23 p.m.

Drug deals on the streets are more ethical than how the state acquired its supply of drugs. ADC drives to N undisclosed location and wants no paper trail? Bet she used a burner phone to make sure no one could trace the calls.

( | suggest removal )

NoCrossNoCrown says... April 22, 2017 at 6:54 p.m.

I guess some blood thirsty judge needed a hefty campaign donation,
so they allowed the state to move forward with their killing spree.

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.





Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online