U.S. utilities delve deeper into solar power

Electric firms take more steps to harness sun as Trump moves to boost fossil fuels

In this Feb. 26, 2015 file photo, solar panels that are part of the Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association's community gardens are shown in Rockford, Minn. Plunging solar power costs are leading U.S. electric companies to capture the sun just when President Donald Trump is moving to boost coal and other fossil fuels.
In this Feb. 26, 2015 file photo, solar panels that are part of the Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association's community gardens are shown in Rockford, Minn. Plunging solar power costs are leading U.S. electric companies to capture the sun just when President Donald Trump is moving to boost coal and other fossil fuels.

RALEIGH, N.C. -- The plunging cost of solar power is leading U.S. electric companies to capture more of the sun just when President Donald Trump is moving to boost coal and other fossil fuels.











RELATED ARTICLES

http://www.arkansas…">U.S. halts ban on travel, says it will appealhttp://www.arkansas…">Sanctions just in, Iranians in drills shoot off missileshttp://www.arkansas…">Firm in dossier on Trump sues BuzzFeed http://www.arkansas…">If Rio Grande fence quirky, wall trickyhttp://www.arkansas…">Kentucky 'massacre' claim elicits chuckles http://www.arkansas…">Pence: Gorsuch will join courthttp://www.arkansas…">Mattis' remarks on isles rile China http://www.arkansas…">Files: Trump still tied to businesshttp://www.arkansas…">Trump's nominee for Army secretary drops out, citing business concerns http://www.arkansas…">ACLU popularity grows http://www.arkansas…">U.S. envoy to U.N. seeks peacekeeping overhaul

Solar power represents just about 1 percent of the electricity U.S. utilities generate today, but that could grow substantially as electric utilities move into smaller-scale solar farming, a niche developed by local cooperatives and nonprofits.

Analysts say it's both an opportunity and a defensive maneuver: Sunshine-capturing technology has become so cheap, so quickly, that utilities are moving to preserve their core business against competition from household solar panels.

"Solar growth is so extensive and has so much momentum behind it that we're at the point where you can't put the genie back in the bottle," said Jeffrey R.S. Brownson, a Pennsylvania State University professor who studies solar adoption. "You either learn how to work with this new medium, solar energy, or you're going to face increasing conflicts."

[PRESIDENT TRUMP: Timeline, appointments, executive orders + guide to actions in first 100 days]

The transition away from coal-burning power plants now seems unstoppable, even if Trump scraps rules requiring utilities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The average lifetime cost for utility-scale wind and solar generation in the U.S. is now cheaper than coal or nuclear and comparable to natural gas, according to a financial advisory firm Lazard, which compared the fuel costs without their federal tax subsidies.

Wind and solar were expected to account for about two-thirds of the new electricity generation capacity added to the nation's power grid in 2016, outpacing fossil fuel expansion for a third straight year, according to the U.S. Energy Department.

And even though big investor-owned utilities operate as legal monopolies in many states, the bill-lowering appeal of rooftop solar for many homeowners could eventually threaten their ability to finance and manage the power grids.

These trends help explain why utilities are increasingly adopting a model called "community solar," or "shared solar," which involves customers agreeing to buy or lease solar panels on large arrays built for the utility, or to buy the power they produce. That electricity is then credited off utility bills under contracts that can lock in power prices for 10 years or more.

Utility-run shared solar also can address competition from independent solar companies that install and operate rooftop solar panels, harvesting and providing the energy at a fixed cost to the individual consumer or some other buyer.

These projects also could appeal to the roughly half of American households that can't install solar panels because they don't own their homes, lack the good credit needed to finance an installation, or lack sufficient roof space where the sun shines consistently, the Energy Department's National Renewable Energy Laboratory reported.

Like the much larger solar operations covering large rural tracts with dark, photovoltaic panels slanted toward the sky, electricity from the utilities' smaller-scale arrays feed into the local power grid, not directly to individual homes or businesses.

Membership-based electric cooperatives, municipal utilities and even nonprofit groups run most of these "solar gardens" around the country, but utilities are moving in. In California, Colorado, Massachusetts and Minnesota, they've been pushed into the space by state law.

Investor-owned utilities now back about 20 percent of the country's community solar programs across 32 states, and represent about 70 percent of the potential output, said Dan Chwastyk of the Smart Electric Power Alliance, a group providing utilities information about shifting into clean-energy technologies.

Charlotte-based Duke Energy Corp., the largest electricity company in the United States, this year plans to begin a community solar program in South Carolina and seek regulatory permission to do the same in North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana, utility Vice President Melisa Johns said.

Duke Energy's South Carolina residential customers would pay $70 upfront for each subscribed kilowatt slice of power potential from a solar array and get credit for their share of what's produced, an investment that should pay for itself three years into the 10-year program.

Minneapolis-based Xcel Energy Inc., Topeka, Kan.-based Westar Energy, and California's three largest investor-owned utilities are among other power companies moving into community solar.

At the moment, switching from coal-fired power plants to natural gas is a cheaper way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, said Stanford University economist Frank Wolak.

A Section on 02/05/2017

Upcoming Events