NYC lags behind other cities on body cameras for police

Zero now, but units for 23,000 patrol officers planned by ’19

FILE - In this Dec. 3, 2014 file photo, New York Police Department officer Joshua Jones wears a VieVu body camera on his chest during a news conference in New York.
FILE - In this Dec. 3, 2014 file photo, New York Police Department officer Joshua Jones wears a VieVu body camera on his chest during a news conference in New York.

NEW YORK -- New York City police plan to put body cameras on all 23,000 of its patrol officers by 2019, an effort that would dwarf all others across the country.

But as the nation's largest police department it is lagging behind other cities, with only limited experience with body cameras, and zero currently on the streets.

Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio said his body camera plan, announced during a proposed labor deal last month with the police officer's union, is crucial to restoring trust between officers and the communities they serve, "creating an atmosphere of transparency and accountability for the good of all."

A federal judge ordered that the city's Police Department try out body cameras as part of a 2013 ruling that found the department was wrongly targeting minorities with its stop-and-frisk tactic. The 2014 killing of Michael Brown, in Ferguson, Mo., and other deaths at the hands of police around the U.S. led to increased demands that officers be issued wearable cameras to deter misconduct and document shootings and other clashes.

Since then, departments across the country began working on improving their policing. Philadelphia and Houston began outfitting a small percentage of officers. Chicago officials said it would finish its camera deployment of about 7,000 cameras earlier than expected, by the end of this year. San Francisco's police force, which had no cameras last fall, now has at least 250 in use.

And Baltimore, where riots occurred after the 2015 death of Freddie Gray from a spinal injury sustained while in police custody, have about 600 officers with cameras since a May roll-out of an $11.6 million program.

New York's Police Department has only experimented with the cameras on a small scale, starting with a 54-camera pilot program that ended in March. The larger roll-out, part of the federal order, began in earnest at the end of 2014 following the end of court appeals. The goal is to have 1,000 cameras deployed to 20 precincts around the city this year. About 5,000 cameras would be deployed by 2018.

The department agreed to a five-year, $6.4 million contract with Vievu for 5,000 body cameras and a cloud-based storage system. The bid from the Seattle-based company came in well under those of about 50 other companies jockeying for the bid, including Taser International, which has publicly complained and privately lobbied against its competitor.

Some City Council members and pastors, concerned by the chatter, called on the Police Department to better vet the contract after reports that other departments had problems with the cameras. The city's Department of Investigation is looking into the agreement.

And earlier this month, the office of New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer briefly delayed a decision to OK the contract, but eventually signed off on it.

The police labor deal, if ratified by officers, would clear one major obstacle: The union would drop a lawsuit over the cameras. Still, several officers said they have mixed feelings about having their every move recorded. Some said it will vindicate their hard work. Others were offended and think the cameras mean they can't be trusted.

Civil-rights advocates have also expressed concerns about how recordings of police interactions with citizens will be used.

Police Commissioner James O'Neill said recently that studies have shown the use of cameras affects the behavior of both police and the communities policed.

"In the long run it's going to have a very positive effect on how we go about our business," he said.

The department plans to deploy the cameras and use lessons learned on the ground to adjust the program as needed. Some of the largest challenges are storage and access -- such as disputes over when officers allowed to turn the camera on and off, and who gets access to that footage.

"There are strong privacy interests to be considered in what is recorded and whether body camera footage is publicly disclosed," said Lawrence Byrne, the department's deputy commissioner for legal matters.

But the cameras won't solve a police department's problems, they'll only help reveal them, said Frank Merenda, a former captain of the city's Police Department who is now an assistant professor of criminal justice at Marist College. He said there should be as much effort put toward new policing efforts as there is in implementing the cameras to officers across the nation.

"You don't want to just shine a light on these problems; you want to solve them, too."

Information for this article was contributed by Jake Pearson of The Associated Press.

A Section on 02/12/2017

Upcoming Events