President Donald Trump just can't get his story straight. At the Conservative Political Action Conference he accused the news media of widespread fabrication, claiming without evidence that "they have no sources; they just make 'em up when there are none."
It is a charge Trump has leveled before. Yet it is wholly incompatible with his assertions at other times (or on the same day) that U.S. intelligence officials are leaking classified information to reporters--and must be ferreted out. Friday morning he tweeted: "The FBI is totally unable to stop the national security 'leakers' that have permeated our government for a long time. They can't even ... find the leakers within the FBI itself. Classified information is being given to media that could have a devastating effect on U.S. FIND NOW"
Which is it? Are the intelligence sources cited in reports by the Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN and others invented by "dishonest" journalists? Or are they real people providing real information who need to be stopped?
Both of the president's claims cannot be true.
It seems clear which one Trump actually believes. He speaks and tweets so frequently about plugging leaks that his consternation appears genuine.
"Things are being leaked," Trump said after Michael Flynn resigned as national security adviser in the wake of a Washington Post report based on leaked information. "It's a criminal action--criminal act--and it's been going on for a long time. Before me. But now it's really going on."
Trump would not have asked for (or received) Flynn's resignation if the sources who spoke to the Post were made up. Defying logic, however, Trump said at CPAC that they were.
The Post cited "nine current and former officials" when it reported that Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country's ambassador to the United States during the month before Trump took office, contrary to what administration officials had said publicly.
In Trump's address to the conservative conference the president said: "There're no nine people. I don't believe there was one or two people. Nine people. And I said, 'Give me a break.' Because I know the people. I know who they talk to. There were no nine people. But they say 'nine people.' And somebody reads it, and they think, 'Oh, nine people. They have nine sources.' They make up sources. They're very dishonest people."
Yes, the sources and the report they yielded were so fake that the president decided Flynn had to go. Got it.
Editorial on 03/01/2017