WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Paul Ryan backed away Wednesday from legislative action to ban "bump stocks," the device a mass shooter used in Las Vegas earlier this month to create machine-gun-like rapid fire from his legal semi-automatic rifle, killing 58 people.
Instead, Ryan and many fellow House Republicans hope the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives will act administratively to outlaw the devices, which the agency previously ruled to be legal in 2010.
"This is a regulation that probably shouldn't have happened in the first place," Ryan, R-Wis., told reporters. He added, "We think the regulatory fix is the smartest, quickest fix."
ATF spokesman Mary Markos declined to say whether the White House or Justice Department could or will compel the agency to re-evaluate its 2010 decision.
Ryan made his remarks a day after 20 bipartisan House members backed a bill to ban bump stocks and similar devices meant to accelerate the firing rate of semi-automatic rifles.
The bill, led by Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla., and Seth Moulton, D-Mass., would make it illegal to manufacture, own or transfer any device that "is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle but does not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun."
Fully automatic machine guns, which fire off multiple rounds with a single pull of the trigger, are much more tightly regulated than semi-automatic weapons under federal law, and guns of that type manufactured after 1986 are generally illegal to own. Bump stocks avoid those restrictions by utilizing a semi-automatic weapon's recoil to repeatedly engage the trigger.
Curbelo said Tuesday that administrative action alone would not solve the issue, noting that the ATF has previously ruled that the devices should not be regulated like machine guns. The bureau made that determination in 2010.
"If they were to get sued after changing that interpretation, the plaintiffs would have a very strong case given the agency's previous determinations," he said. "So if people agree with banning these devices, let's pass a law. It's the best way to make sure it gets done."
Ryan's comments Wednesday went somewhat further than his comments last week, shortly after the National Rifle Association issued a statement saying bump stocks ought to be more tightly restricted and that the ATF ought to revisit its prior rulings.
"Fully automatic weapons have been outlawed for many, many years," Ryan said Oct 5. "This seems to be a way of going around that, so obviously we need to look how we can tighten up the compliance with this law so that fully automatic weapons are banned."
While many gun-rights advocates in Congress have expressed a willingness to restrict bump stocks and similar devices, they are wary of taking action through legislation. With the presidency and both chambers of Congress under GOP control, and yet few pieces of major legislation signed into law, multiple House Republicans said privately this week that it would be politically untenable to put a bill on President Donald Trump's desk enacting a new gun control.
But there may be enough moderate Republicans to help push a bump-stock bill to the fore.
Curbelo said Tuesday that he expected to add "many more" Republican co-sponsors to his bill in the coming days.
A Washington Post count of GOP lawmakers suggests there are enough Republicans willing to join with Democrats in the House to pass a ban.
Rep. Glenn Thompson, R-Pa., said he's "an avid sportsman" who sometimes goes shooting with his wife and pastor after church. He and many lawmakers have said they'd never heard of bump stocks until the Las Vegas shooting.
"Anything that modifies something from a semi-automatic to an automatic seems like it should be illegal," he said in an interview. "I'm hoping and I anticipate that we'll have a good discussion and maybe fix that."
Gun-control advocates, meanwhile, are also pushing for legislation. Mark Kelly, the co-founder of Americans for Responsible Solutions, told reporters Friday that legislation is the most reliable way to not only restrict bump stocks but also deal with the ancillary issues any new restrictions might create.
"We don't want people to have automatic weapons that we don't know who they are, they're not registered. These people aren't fingerprinted. That is not a good scenario," he said. "We need to put these people in the position that the thing that they have, that they are now holding something that is illegal for them to be in possession of."
Information for this article was contributed by Mike DeBonis of The Washington Post and by Alan Fram, Erica Werner, Sadie Gurman and Kevin Freking of The Associated Press.
A Section on 10/12/2017