Subscribe Register Login
Wednesday, September 20, 2017, 10:36 p.m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

Senators unveil competing plans for nation's health care system

By The Associated Press

This article was originally published September 13, 2017 at 12:04 p.m. Updated September 13, 2017 at 12:54 p.m.

file-in-this-jan-17-2017-file-photo-sen-bernie-sanders-i-vt-left-questions-education-secretary-designate-betsy-devos-on-capitol-hill-in-washington

FILE - In this Jan. 17, 2017 file photo, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., left, questions Education Secretary-designate Betsy DeVos, on Capitol Hill in Washington.


WASHINGTON — Senators on Wednesday rolled out competing plans for the nation's health care system, with a group of GOP senators making an effort to undo Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders proposing universal government-run coverage.

Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Bill Cassidy, R-La., proposed legislation that would do away with many of the subsidies and mandates of the 2010 law and instead would provides block grants to the states to help individuals pay for health coverage.

"If you believe repealing and replacing Obamacare is a good idea, this is your best and only chance to make it happen because everything else has failed except this approach," Graham told reporters.

The senators said that some states would get more money to provide health care than they get through the current system. They are modeling their effort after the welfare reform legislation passed under President Bill Clinton in the 1990s. They said states are better equipped than Washington to determine how best to meet the needs of their residents.

They also acknowledged they have an uphill battle to get the bill passed before Oct. 1 when the GOP effort to repeal the law loses its protection against Democratic filibusters.

"To my Republican colleagues, don't let the health care debate die. Don't leave the field with your tail between your legs. Keep fighting," Graham said.

Sanders, the Vermont independent who caucuses with Democrats, unveiled legislation that would allow Americans to get health coverage simply by showing a new government-issued card. Consumers also would no longer owe out-of-pocket expenses like deductibles.

But Sanders' description of his measure omitted specifics about how much it would cost and final decisions about how he would pay for it.

In an interview, Sanders said Tuesday his measure would likely be paid for in a "progressive way." Aides said it would likely be financed by income-adjusted premiums people would pay the government, ranging from no premiums for the poorest Americans to high levies on the rich and corporations.

The measure has no chance of becoming law with President Donald Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling Congress. But it embodies a push to universal coverage that eluded Obama's 2010 law and is a tenet of the Democratic Party's liberal, activist base.

"I think in a democracy, we should be doing what the American people want," Sanders said, citing polls showing growing support for the concept.

He released his bill hours after the Census Bureau said the proportion of uninsured Americans fell to 8.8 percent last year, the lowest figure on record.

Sanders calls his bill Medicare for All, and it would expand the health insurance program for the elderly to cover all Americans. It would be phased in over four years, and people and businesses would no longer owe premiums to insurers.

The measure would make health care less expensive and less complicated for many people and businesses. It would cover the 28 million Americans remaining uninsured despite Obama's law.

Yet some Democrats fear Sanders is exposing them to a lose-lose choice. Don't support Sanders' plan and Democrats risk alienating the party's liberal, activist voters, volunteers and contributors. Back it and they'll be accused by Republicans of backing a huge tax increase and government-run health care, and taking away employer-provided coverage for half the country that many people like.

At least 12 Senate Democrats had signed onto Sanders' bill by late Tuesday, including four potential 2020 presidential contenders besides Sanders: Kamala Harris of California, Massachusetts' Elizabeth Warren, New York's Kirsten Gillibrand and Cory Booker of New Jersey.

Several Democrats were introducing their own bills that expand coverage without going as far as Sanders, including possible presidential aspirants Sens. Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Ohio's Sherrod Brown. Several Democrats facing tough re-elections next year in GOP-leaning states say they want to focus on strengthening Obama's existing law, including Montana's Jon Tester and Missouri's Claire McCaskill.

"We welcome the Democrats' strategy of moving even further left," said Katie Martin, spokeswoman for the Senate GOP's campaign organization.

Graham and Cassidy have struggled for weeks to round up sufficient support for their package, although Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Dean Heller, R-Nev., signed on. It would cut and reshape Medicaid, disperse money spent under Obama's law directly to states and erase Obama's penalties on people who don't purchase coverage.

No. 3 Senate GOP leader John Thune of South Dakota said Graham and Cassidy would need "a double-double bank shot" to prevail, a joking reference to an impossible basketball shot.

A third effort, a bipartisan attempt to shore up individual insurance markets around the country, is showing early signs that the sides are having problems reaching agreement.

Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Patty Murray, D-Wash., hope to reach a deal on continuing for at least a year the federal payments to insurers that Trump has threatened to halt. Republicans are also insisting on easing the Obama law's coverage requirements, which Democrats oppose.

Alexander said Tuesday that Republicans want "real state flexibility" to let insurers offer "a larger variety of benefits and payment rules."

Read Thursday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments on: Senators unveil competing plans for nation's health care system

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 total comments

mrcharles says... September 13, 2017 at 12:33 p.m.

If we want bronze age thinking by repugnants, we of course need bronze age medical system to be consistent. Me, I am investing in unblemished bulls, goats, sheep, etc, and for the poor the very best turtle doves, most hardly ever cut in half.thinking about franchising the concept nationwide. Will call it "We Dont need NO Stinkin Human Sacrifices!"....... that sounds way too barbaric and Aztec like.

Uncle Joe is taking other side. Investing in private cemeteries, casket companies, funeral homes and companies who sell embalming stuff. Diversify your investments he says just in case the deluded again act deluded.

Pigslop if you ever get leprosy , I have a sure fire cure for it, just call on me as I am forgiving for those who know not what they do [ feeble mindless seems to be their main problem you know]. will give you a discount on turtle doves.

Seems to be a sunny day out there.

( | suggest removal )

gohogs17 says... September 13, 2017 at 12:40 p.m.

chuckie: I wouldn't ask you for anything! You're beyond nuts, you should be committed as you are a threat to yourself and humanity.

( | suggest removal )

TimberTopper says... September 13, 2017 at 1:25 p.m.

I'm thinking it's a no go on the Sanders and the Republicans both.

( | suggest removal )

drdrbob says... September 13, 2017 at 3:24 p.m.

Single payer, while social, is NOT welfare. Unless they (and the people) want to start calling fire, police, and other community services (tax based with government guidelines and oversight) "welfare." There is absolutely NO rational basis for a non-hands on healthcare provider (insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies etc.) to make money (profit) from the labor of actual providers, except for the low administrative costs. And most pharmaceutical companies already get massive amounts of government and academic support (as in $ and personnel) for the development of drugs, which is fine if they then don't get profit on top of that. The police and fire departments, and their chiefs, are paid (should be a reasonable amount that is provided by the community tax base...I.e. social but not welfare) but they don't and shouldn't make a profit on top of that. Mayo and Cleveland Clinics are good examples of essentially non-profit providers that deliver superb service from salaried professionals (as is done in most of the rest of the "civilized" world).
Bob Gale, MD,JD

( | suggest removal )

mrcharles says... September 13, 2017 at 7:45 p.m.

Mr Gale information of facts and compassion will get you no where in Arkansas.

I see no calling out of minorities, low wage workers, people doing the best they can, commies everywhere higher intelligence and learning exists, or hate just for hates sake. Some might say you qualify for one those sheep.

And just cause you have a double d education background I refer you to sea bass who played football & those who know what discredited right wing sites say about Obama. So who am I to believe you or the ones who are proud to be one of the goats.

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

ADVERTISEMENT

SHOPPING

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online