Check out the redesigned ADG Explore

Today's Paper Latest stories Obits Email newsletters Weather Traffic Puzzles + games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption FILE - In this June 9, 2018 file photo, President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference at the G-7 summit in La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada.

NEW YORK — New York's attorney general filed a lawsuit Thursday accusing Donald Trump of illegally using money from his charitable foundation to settle disputes involving his business empire and to burnish his image during his run for the White House.

The president blasted the case as politically motivated.

The lawsuit seeks $2.8 million in restitution and the dissolution of the foundation.

The two-year investigation detailed a closely coordinated effort between Trump's campaign and the foundation to promote his political career by giving out big grants of other's people money to veterans organizations during the run-up to the Iowa caucuses, the first presidential nominating contest of 2016, the suit says.

"The foundation's grants made Mr. Trump and the campaign look charitable and increased the candidate's profile to Republican primary voters and among important constituent groups," Democratic Attorney General Barbara Underwood's lawsuit said.


It accused the foundation of "improper and extensive political activity, repeated and willful self-dealing transactions, and failure to follow basic fiduciary obligations."

In a couple of tweets, Trump called the case "ridiculous."

"I won't settle this case!" he wrote.

[DOCUMENT: Read the lawsuit]

The 31-year-old foundation said that it has given more than $19 million to charitable causes while keeping expenses minimal and that Trump and his companies have contributed more than $8 million.

It already announced its intention to dissolve more than a year ago, the charity added in a statement.

"This is politics at its very worst," the statement said, noting that the former New York attorney general who began the investigation, Democrat Eric Schneiderman, was a vocal Trump opponent.

Schneiderman resigned last month after he was accused of physically abusing women he dated; he denied the allegations. Trump's tweets also pointed to Schneiderman's resignation.

"Schneiderman, who ran the Clinton campaign in New York, never had the guts to bring this ridiculous case, which lingered in their office for almost 2 years. Now he resigned his office in disgrace, and his disciples brought it when we would not settle," Trump said.

Schneiderman started investigating the charity and ordered it to stop fundraising in New York in 2016, after The Washington Post reported that the foundation's spending personally benefited the presidential candidate.

Some of those expenditures, uncovered by The Post, were cited in the lawsuit, including a $100,000 payment to settle legal claims against Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla.; $158,000 to resolve a suit over a prize for a hole-in-one contest at Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y., and $10,000 to buy a 6-foot portrait of Trump at a charity auction.

After New York's attorney general began investigating, Trump's business empire reimbursed the foundation for the money spent to settle the business disputes. And the painting, which was hanging at a Trump golf club in the Miami area, was returned to the foundation.

Underwood, a career government lawyer who was appointed after Schneiderman's resignation and has said she doesn't intend to run for election, said she has referred her findings to the IRS and the Federal Election Commission for possible further action.

In exchange for their tax-exempt status, charities are required to follow certain rules, among them a strict prohibition against getting involved in political campaigns.

The Trump Foundation's mission says its funds are to be used "exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes," either directly or through other organizations, according to the lawsuit.

In keeping with federal tax rules, the charity's incorporation documents say none of its resources can directly or indirectly go to the benefit its directors or officers and none of its activities can benefit any political candidate or campaign.

Trump's foundation was "co-opted" by his presidential campaign, particularly in the run-up to the Iowa caucuses, the lawsuit says.

Spurning a Republican candidates' debate on Jan. 28, 2016 — four days before the caucuses — Trump instead participated in a televised rally and fundraiser for veterans organizations.

The event raised approximately $5.6 million, about $2.8 million of which went to the Trump Foundation; the rest was given directly by donors to veterans groups, the lawsuit says.

Then the foundation "ceded control" over the money to campaign staff members, the suit says.

"Is there any way we can make some disbursements this week while in Iowa?" then-campaign manager Corey Lewandowski wrote in an email to the chief financial officer of Trump's business, the Trump Organization.

Lewandowski did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The foundation went on to make five grants of $100,000 before the caucuses, with Trump presenting giant checks at a series of campaign rallies, to applause and praise from such figures as Jerry Falwell Jr., the president of Liberty University and son of the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, who was a force in GOP politics.

"How often do you see a presidential candidate giving money away instead of taking it?" the younger Falwell told the crowd at a Trump rally.

The oversized checks bore Trump's "Make America Great Again" campaign slogan along with the foundation's address.

Trump didn't give any money personally at the time, but several months later, after media pressure, followed through on a pledge to donate $1 million.

During his campaign, Trump was highly critical of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton's family charity, the Clinton Foundation, for taking donations from people who met with her while she was secretary of state.

Iowa groups that got checks said Thursday they were grateful for the money.

Support Siouxland Soldiers used its $100,000 donation to open an emergency food pantry and provide clothing, haircuts and other services to veterans, founder Sarah Petersen said. She said she is not sure what to make of the lawsuit against Trump.

"I think people support a candidate based on lots of decisions and choices and positions on the issues," she said. "I don't know that giving a charity a donation would sway a lot of voters."

Read Friday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • 23cal
    June 14, 2018 at 10:41 a.m.

    Karma isn't a bitch unless you are.
    Lock them up.

  • BOLTAR
    June 14, 2018 at 11:25 a.m.

    Here comes a lot of financial discovery, and Trump can't fire her.

  • JiminyC56
    June 14, 2018 at 12:09 p.m.

    What a farce. What about the Clinton Foundation?

  • hurricane46
    June 14, 2018 at 3:12 p.m.

    Great news!

  • BoudinMan
    June 14, 2018 at 4:46 p.m.

    Sanders quoting the bible as rationale for tearing babies out of mothers' arms, and trump family being sued by the state of New York. What a daily double!

  • 23cal
    June 14, 2018 at 6:38 p.m.

    And heeeeeere's JiminyC with the inevitable whataboutism.
    *
    What about the Clinton Foundation? Well, instead of convicting or charging them based on your suspicions and right wing propaganda, investigate them for two years, accumulate the evidence, and charge them if indicated.......exactly like what has been done here.
    *
    Trump says this investigation is politically motivated, but it has gone on for two years. That's at least 24 months. He has been president less than 17 months. What, they went after him for political reasons before he took office?
    *
    I suspect his math-impaired acolytes will buy this, regardless of how absurd it is.

  • TimberTopper
    June 14, 2018 at 7:03 p.m.

    It sure looks like the whole family has used the foundation as their personal loan when needed bank. The con of the con man and con family will at some point be fully exposed, and at that point it could very well be a hard job to find anyone that will admit voting for this, whatever.

  • LRDawg
    June 15, 2018 at 11:15 a.m.

    No surprise here....we all knew Trump was a crook

  • JiminyC56
    June 15, 2018 at 12:34 p.m.

    LMAO at you snowflakes! It is pretty funny just reading the hate in your posts. You are all melting. MAGA! Winning!

  • TimberTopper
    June 15, 2018 at 1:59 p.m.

    C56, winning? LOL! Sounds like something mozzy would say.

ADVERTISEMENT