Subscribe Register Login
Saturday, June 23, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Mobile App

OPINION

Agenda or ignorance?

By Walter Williams

This article was published March 8, 2018 at 2:55 a.m.

Before we discuss violence with guns, I'd like to run a couple of questions by you. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, every day nearly 30 Americans die in motor vehicle crashes that involve drunk driving. What kind of restrictions should be placed on automobile ownership? Should there be federal background checks in order for people to obtain a driver's license or purchase a car?

This story is only available from the Arkansas Online archives. Stories can be purchased individually for $2.95. Click here to search for this story in the archives.

Print Headline: Agenda or ignorance?

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments on: Agenda or ignorance?

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 total comments

BoudinMan says... March 8, 2018 at 7:41 a.m.

Let's see here. What about cars? They kill people, too. Check. Then, guns don't kill people. People with guns kill people. Check. And that's probably what Williams is getting from the NRA. Check.

( | suggest removal )

23cal says... March 8, 2018 at 8:09 a.m.

"Guns are also inanimate objects and, like cars and knives, cannot act on their own. It's also plain folly to focus on guns in the cases of shooting deaths.'
*
It is strange that such a blatantly illogical argument is one of the most prolific.
*
The dishonest framing ignores that it is a COMBINATION of people and firearms which is the common factor in shooting deaths.
*
The "guns don't shoot people, people shoot people" paradigm ignores the flip side of the same coin: people WITHOUT FIREARMS don't shoot people any more than guns without people shoot people.
*
There are two components to the problem, and to ignore one component by pretending it isn't a factor is absurd.

( | suggest removal )

hah406 says... March 8, 2018 at 8:37 a.m.

In the first paragraph, Williams conveniently ignores the facts that we impose lower age limits on driving, and a variable upper limit based on physical condition as well; that getting a drivers license involves passing a written and physical test; that the licenses are of limited duration and must be renewed; and that the license can be revoked for a myriad of reasons. Yet none of that exists with gun ownership, so stop trying to say that apples and peaches are the same fruit.

( | suggest removal )

WhododueDiligence says... March 8, 2018 at 9:02 a.m.

"Before we discuss violence with guns, I'd like to ..."
*
... change the subject.
So let's discuss motor vehicles instead. Why, sure. Of course. Perfect analogy. Guns and motor vehicles are SO much alike. When you get in your car and press the trigger it keeps firing on all cylinders until you run out of gas or you text someone and smash it to smithereens. This is perfectly analogous to pressing the trigger on an assault rifle rigged with a bump stock and 100-round magazines--it keeps firing until you run out of ammunition or the barrel starts to melt from overheating, whichever comes first. Remember the guy in Las Vegas who, from more than a quarter mile away, killed 58 people and wounded 400 more not counting additional hundreds who were injured in the ensuing panic to escape? No? Well, no worries, that doesn't count since what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Willfully forgotten. End of story.
*
Bump stocks on assault rifles are also perfectly analogous to bump stock car racing on the largest tracks where bumping stock cars reach speeds of 300 feet per second. The stream of bullets from an assault rifle travel only 10 times faster than that. But it's easier to talk about motor vehicles instead. How about those bump stocks at Talladega!
*
Like motor vehicles just sitting there, guns are inanimate so we mustn't do anything. If only they were animated, someone could frown on them. But, nope, they're not. They're inanimate. By rights, they've been tried and found forever innocent by reason of inanimativity. Of course machine guns and flame throwers and those cute little sawed-off looking grenade launchers are inanimate too, so ... WHOOO$$$$$$$$$HHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There we go.

( | suggest removal )

BOLTAR says... March 8, 2018 at 9:37 a.m.

A common pro-gun strategy is to tire us out with repetitious arguments so obviously stupid we don't bother to refute them, allowing them to claim victory by default. Thanks for refusing to be defeated by boredom.

( | suggest removal )

23cal says... March 8, 2018 at 9:57 a.m.

About "We must own up to the fact that laws and regulations alone cannot produce a civilized society."
*
Maybe this author needs to "own up to the fact" that countries with heavy firearm restrictions have very few firearm deaths, proof positive that easy access to firearms is a significant component of shootings. I suggest as we fight against his governmental overreach to "produce a civilized society" by draconian and biased social engineering, that we take some time to try to keep firearms out of the wrong hands.

( | suggest removal )

BOLTAR says... March 8, 2018 at 10:16 a.m.

Which is more essential to civilized society: the ability to transport people and the necessities of life or the ability for each of us to shoot many people at will? The false equivalency between cars and guns is beyond ludicrous.

( | suggest removal )

DoubleBlind says... March 8, 2018 at 10:38 a.m.

Whataboutism...yawn

( | suggest removal )

3WorldState1 says... March 8, 2018 at 11:31 a.m.

Or that you had to attend two weeks of driving school to reduce your car insurance by 10%.
So, let's do two weeks of gun/shooting school so you can get 10% off of your gun/negligence insurance. I'm sure the NRA would love to go down that road.
This article is just so stupid.

( | suggest removal )

LR1955 says... March 9, 2018 at 11:20 a.m.

Just an observation about all the above comments: nothing about assault rifles in particular, nothing about enforcing laws in place (felons possessing guns is against the law but tracking them down would be very difficult) just guns & fire arms. Just Progressives progressing into their real agenda, taking up all guns from legal owners. That would be pretty easy wouldn't it.

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

ADVERTISEMENT

SHOPPING

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online