Subscribe Register Login
Saturday, July 21, 2018, 10:28 a.m.


Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal


JOHN BRUMMETT: The argument for passion

By John Brummett

This article was published March 20, 2018 at 4:30 a.m.

We had a vigorous public question-and-answer session Friday evening when I spoke to Benton County Democrats in Rogers.

This story is only available from the Arkansas Online archives. Stories can be purchased individually for $2.95. Click here to search for this story in the archives.

Print Headline: The argument for passion


Comments on: JOHN BRUMMETT: The argument for passion

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 28 total comments

Jump to last page >>

BoudinMan says... March 20, 2018 at 6:43 a.m.

We need to decide on which of these candidates to support. Then we nned to invest in that person with sweat equity and treasure. Then we need to get like-minded voters to the polls. Then we must vote French Hill out of office. 11.6.18

( | suggest removal )

mozarky2 says... March 20, 2018 at 7:08 a.m.

Vote French Hill out?
Never happen, BUT, I love it when dims piss away other people's money.

( | suggest removal )

PopMom says... March 20, 2018 at 7:50 a.m.

Hillary lost because people know too much about the Clinton baggage. She appeared cold and unlikable. Bernie is as likable as can be, and I would love to have a beer with him. While I actually am in favor of healthcare for all, Bernie would not have been elected because his ideas of giving away free college etc. meant that everybody was going to have a stiff tax increase. Running on higher taxes doesn't work. I don't think that Spencer's ideas about expanding federal housing (which always has been the subject of graft and mismanagement) bode well for his candidacy. As much as everybody hates Trump, socialism isn't in vogue either except among extreme liberals. The reason Democrats won in Virginia and Pennsylvania is by putting up moderates. In fact, the strides Virginia has made in turning that state from red to a more bluish purple should be copied in Arkansas. One can be socially liberal and in favor of education without turning to socialism and higher taxes. While Virginia has become bluer, it also has turned itself from a sleepy Southern state into more of an economic powerhouse. Its high tech corridor in northern Virginia is extremely impressive. Tucker appears to be a more moderate candidate who would stand a better chance in November though I will give money to anybody who wins the Democratic nomination.

( | suggest removal )

Rightside says... March 20, 2018 at 7:52 a.m.

2016 look back: Hillary Clinton is ahead of Donald Trump by double digits with just over three weeks until Election Day, according to a new national NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll conducted entirely after the second presidential debate. To put Clinton's current 11-point lead into perspective, Barack Obama beat John McCain by seven points nationally in 2008. And Obama's margin of victory over Mitt Romney in 2012 was four points. "Donald Trump's chances of winning this election have faded," says Democratic pollster Fred Yang of Hart Research Associates, which conducted this survey with Republican pollster Bill McInturff and his firm Public Opinion Strategies.

New York Times: Hillary Clinton has an 85% chance to win. Last updated Tuesday, November 8.
Trump's chances of winning in Pennsylvania 11%, in Michigan 6%, in Florida 33%. Times prediction were slightly wrong Trump won Pennsylvania, Michigan and Florida.

Medicare taxes and Social Security taxes make up the FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) tax. Every worker in America is required by law to pay FICA taxes. Working People not on Medicare supplement people who are on Medicare.

( | suggest removal )

BOLTAR says... March 20, 2018 at 7:54 a.m.

Super delegates and the electoral college both serve to frustrate the popular will and should be eliminated.

( | suggest removal )

hah406 says... March 20, 2018 at 9:49 a.m.

mozarky I think you underestimate the voters of Pulaski county, and are overestimating the turnout in Faulkner or Saline, for the man who has taken millions of dollars from the NRA and Wall Street.

( | suggest removal )

GeneralMac says... March 20, 2018 at 9:52 a.m.

...." So the super delegates helped stop him by casting their votes for Hillary "...

Not exactly !

Long before Bernie Sanders gained traction Hillary had received assurances and donations $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ from nearly every super delegate.

That is why from nearly a year out, pundits said Hillary had a lock on the nomination.
She had the Super Delegates pledged to her nearly a year out.

( | suggest removal )

drs01 says... March 20, 2018 at 9:58 a.m.

The 2016 presidential election came down to "the people versus the parties", both parties. Democrats were hell bent on Hillary despite her excessive baggage. Republican leading candidates represented "the establishment". Unfortunately this battle of party versus the will of the people continues today.
If the Arkansas Heights liberals want to support Tucker, then once again they will be losing in the 2nd district. Voters in the surrounding counties will never accept this party insider any more than they did the "token" candidates who opposed Hill in the past.
I believe there are four major issues facing us today: Guns, Drugs, Illegal Immigrants, and Healthcare. They all four pit the federal laws against what individual states want, or believe they need. The "will of the people" differs from state to state. The candidates who can effectively address these issues will prevail.

( | suggest removal )

Packman says... March 20, 2018 at 10:03 a.m.

".....losing the general election to Donald Trump." "Then he (Donald Trump) tapped into and stirred real passions already present in real people...."
QUICK, somebody notify the newspaper that John Brummett has been kidnapped and some sane and reasonable person is working in his place. This is surely an imposter because there is no way John Brummett would violate his contract and write something that acknowledged Donald Trump won the election by having real people (meaning ordinary, intelligent, sincere Americans) vote for him.
Hey Boudin - Clarke Tucker will have the best chance against Hill if he follows the Connor Lamb template. But that would mean Tucker would have to embrace Trump's tax cuts, trade deals, environmental regulation rollbacks, and support the 2A. Regardless of how Tucker campaigns if people vote with their pocketbooks and blacks fail to turn out in big numbers because Tucker defeated the black candidate in the primary Hill will win regardless

( | suggest removal )

GeneralMac says... March 20, 2018 at 10:12 a.m.

PopMom says.........." Bernie Sanders would not have been elected "...


Also true what PopMom says about candidates who support raising taxes.

I followed the early Democrat candidates in 1988 and watched a few Democrat debates.
Every Democrat candidate was promising a lot and the moderator asked how they would pay for it. Dukakis and Gephart "beat around the bush" until the buzzer went off and then smiled. Bruce Babbitt, my candidate, said " taxes would have to be raised "
The other candidates looked at him in mock horror knowing that statement had " cut his own throat".

Even Barack HUSSEIN Obama, who blasted the Bush tax cuts, REFUSED to get rid of them and revert to the tax rates under Bill Clinton.

Once the citizens get used to bigger paychecks $$$$$$$ due to the Trump tax cuts, no Democrat will suggest getting rid of the Trump tax cuts.

They will preach what all they will give you but use that flimsy " tax the rich" like Barack HUSSEIN Obama uttered every day he was president.

( | suggest removal )

Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.





Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online