I heard "yanny."
This is, I know now, objectively wrong. In 2007 actor Jay Aubrey Jones was recorded pronouncing the word "laurel" for vocabulary.com. Earlier this month, a high school student in Georgia named Katie Hetzel played that audio clip, but like me, she heard "yanny." So she posted it to social media to find out how it sounded to others. By last week, yanny vs. laurel had spread across the Internet, another low-stakes demonstration of how human perceptions vary.
All the things that are going on in the world make such memes even more compelling. We are living in an age of siloed experiences, disputed data and binary politics. The yanny/laurel divide is a depoliticized version of so many other seemingly unbridgeable gaps in how we see the world.
You likely also remember 2015's notorious photo of the striped dress, which appeared white and gold to some people, blue and black to others. Since then, there have been a jacket, a shoe and a tennis ball of disputed hue. "Viral illusions," as the Atlantic has called them, play to the modern tendency to turn every dilemma into a binary--yes-or-no, good-or-bad--debate. Most of our problems are far more complex than that, though. They defy objectively "correct" answers.
Most of us know this to be true, yet we're burrowed so deeply in our own beliefs it can be hard to conceptualize that there is another way of seeing the world. Confronted with the opinions of people on the opposite side of many political issues, often I fail to even begin to understand how they could believe what they do.
I am not alone in this. "How do you not hear yanny?" is another way of asking: How can anyone believe that criminalizing abortion will make it go away? How could anyone not believe stricter gun laws would reduce school shootings? How could anyone think that separating refugee children from their parents and holding them indefinitely in immigration detention centers is morally defensible?
It probably won't save our democracy or even de-escalate our political discourse, but pausing to take stock of our individual biases before firing off a tweet or 911 call would be a welcome change. Just look at the barrage of recent incidents in which white people were quick to identify black people as threats when they were waiting for a friend at Starbucks or napping in a common area of their dorm.
What if, instead of doing the equivalent of tweeting "It's obviously yanny," we all listened more closely?
I replayed the clip over and over, straining to hear even the faintest "laurel." I was compelled by the idea that I might be able to close the gap between my perception and others'--if not in politics, at least in this meme. I wanted to hear what all those other people heard. After finding a New York Times tool that allows users to adjust the audio mix, finally I could hear the "laurel" in there too. If only we had such a tool for our real lives.
------------v------------
Ann Friedman is a contributing writer to Los Angeles Times Opinion.
Editorial on 05/28/2018