OPINION

A need for Fox News?

Some of you almost surely hate Fox News. But you know something? It isn't so bad. It counterbalances the anti-Trump, leftist, over-reaching, sometimes hysterical bias afflicting too much of what too many of its TV competitors offer. And, even without Charles Krauthammer, much of it is pretty darned intelligent and insightful.

Minus Fox, conservative commentary on TV wouldn't be gone entirely. But it would be vastly diminished, thereby delighting people like Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama. The former president could hardly stand it that Fox didn't think he was just about always right.

Krauthammer didn't for sure. I bring up his name because he was widely recognized in varied political camps as an extraordinary newspaper and Fox News commentator. He was one of the best news analysts in the country, meticulously well-informed and thoughtful, whose mansion of a mind I have missed so much since his illness and recent death. Few could do what he could do.

When critics ponder Fox News, however, they have mostly liked to gaze at a different sort of regular, such as Sean Hannity. While he has his virtues, he was practically a Trump campaign manager during the elections and serves as something of an extra press secretary in the here and now. Unlike wisely detached Krauthammer, a conservative who did not hesitate to go after Trump when as much was called for, Hannity is buddy-buddy with the Oval Office and no better at enlightened perspectives than his Trump-despising opposites on other cable channels.

Another champ of intellect as well as a first-rate impartial newsman is Chris Wallace, host of Fox News Sunday, whose questions neither shout nor antagonize but seek and get incisive give-and-take from lively panels.

Wallace does still more on Fox, but wait, I now want to point to another show of heft, one of the best hours of calm, cool, instructive discussion you'll get on TV:

It's the Journal Editorial Report hosted by Paul Gigot, editor of surely one of the best editorial pages in America, that of The Wall Street Journal. A Pulitzer Prize winner, he surrounds himself with other Journal whizzes, and calls as well on outsiders whose expertise pops balloons of bombast both left and right.

I can't delve into everyone, such as the satirical wits on The Five or such well-known names as Dana Perino, Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson, for instance, although I will say Carlson is charming and great at correcting politically correct goofiness, although his populism is not my thing.

While I've mostly been commenting on commentary, the straight news is by and large reasonably good for TV. The deal, the big deal, is that truth is not so easy to get at, no ideology has forever escaped fallacy, and just as our democracy needs liberal and conservative politicians to fight off the worst of each other, we need commentators who do the same.

Editorial on 01/03/2019

Upcoming Events