House approves disaster-aid funds

State’s lawmakers back $19.1B plan

Rep. John Rose, R-Tenn., a freshman from Cookeville, Tenn., speaks to reporters at the Capitol after he blocked a unanimous consent vote during a scheduled pro forma session of the House on a long-awaited $19 billion disaster aid bill in the chamber, Thursday, May 30, 2019. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and freshman Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, have both blocked passage of the measure in the past week. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Rep. John Rose, R-Tenn., a freshman from Cookeville, Tenn., speaks to reporters at the Capitol after he blocked a unanimous consent vote during a scheduled pro forma session of the House on a long-awaited $19 billion disaster aid bill in the chamber, Thursday, May 30, 2019. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and freshman Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, have both blocked passage of the measure in the past week. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON -- A long-delayed $19.1 billion disaster-aid bill sailed through the House on Monday and headed to President Donald Trump for his expected signature, overcoming months of infighting and disagreements between Trump and congressional Democrats.

Lawmakers gave the measure final congressional approval by a vote of 354-58 in the House's first significant action after returning from a 10-day recess. It was backed by all 222 voting Democrats and 132 Republicans, including the GOP's top leaders, all four of Arkansas' congressmen and other legislators from areas hit by hurricanes, floods, tornadoes and fires. Fifty-eight Republicans voted "no," including many of the party's most conservative members.

The legislation will go to Trump, who has described the bill as "great."

[RELATED: Central Arkansas waits, hopes rain stays away]

Three conservative Republicans held up the bill during the break, objecting on three occasions to efforts by Democratic leaders to pass the bill by a voice vote requiring unanimity. They said the legislation shouldn't be rushed through without a recorded vote, arguing that it reflects an increasingly permissive attitude in Washington on spending to address disasters that sooner or later hit every region of the country.

Two of the three -- Reps. Chip Roy of Texas and Thomas Massie of Kentucky -- voted against the package when it was brought up for the fourth time on Monday. Rep. John Rose, R-Tenn., voted for it.

Along the way, House and Senate old-timers seemed to outmaneuver the White House, though Trump personally prevailed upon Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., to drop a bid to free up billions of dollars for dredging and other harbor projects. The Senate passed the bill by a sweeping 85-8 vote on its way out of Washington on May 23, a margin that reflected a consensus that the bill is long overdue. Both of Arkansas' senators voted in favor of the bill.

Shelby told reporters Monday that the long delays on the bill "should never have happened."

"I think we could do better," Shelby said. "I don't think it was our best show."

The measure was initially held up over a fight between Trump and Democrats over aid to Puerto Rico.

[RELATED: Pine Bluff officials brace for river crest, remain optimistic]

"Some in our government refused to assist our fellow Americans in Puerto Rico who are still recovering from a 2017 hurricane. I'm pleased we've moved past that," said House Appropriations Committee Chairman Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., who introduced the bill. "Because when disaster strikes, we shouldn't let a ZIP code dictate our response."

The measure also faced delays amid failed talks on Trump's $4 billion-plus request to care for thousands of mostly Central American migrants being held at the southern border. The sides narrowed their differences but couldn't reach agreement in the rush to go on recess, but lawmakers agreed that another bill will be needed almost immediately to refill nearly empty agency accounts to care for migrants.

"We must work together quickly to pass a bill that addresses the surge of unaccompanied children crossing the border and provides law enforcement agencies with the funding they need," said top Appropriations Committee Republican Kay Granger of Texas. "The stakes are high. There are serious -- life or death -- repercussions if the Congress does not act."

[RELATED: Flood threat rises around Lake Conway]

The measure is largely the same as a version that passed the House last month. Republicans opposed it for leaving out the border funding.

House liberals also demanded to block the Department of Homeland Security from getting information from federal social welfare authorities to help track immigrants residing in the U.S. illegally who take migrant refugee children into their homes.

As the measure languished, disasters kept coming -- with failed levees in Arkansas, Iowa and Missouri and tornadoes across Ohio the most recent examples. The measure is supported by leaders of both parties in the House and Senate.

The legislation is also being driven by Florida and Georgia lawmakers frustrated over delays in delivering help to farmers, towns and military bases slammed by hurricanes last fall. Flooding in Iowa and Nebraska this spring added to the coalition behind the measure, which delivers much of its help to regions where Trump supporters dominate.

The bill started out as a $7.8 billion measure passed in the last days of House GOP control. A $14 billion version advanced in the Democrat-led chamber in January and ballooned to $19.1 billion by the time it emerged from the floor last month, fed by new funding for community rehabilitation projects, Army Corps of Engineers water and flood protection projects, and rebuilding funds for several military bases, including Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska. It also includes a provision pushed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to ensure that industrial hemp will be covered by federal crop insurance.

Some Republicans opposed funding to mitigate future disasters as part of rebuilding projects when Superstorm Sandy funding passed in 2013, but many have embraced such funding now that areas such as suburban Houston need it. Democrats, for their part, held firm for what ended up as roughly $1.4 billion in aid for Puerto Rico.

Information for this article was contributed by Andrew Taylor of The Associated Press; by Erica Werner of The Washington Post; and by Emily Cochrane of The New York Times.

A Section on 06/04/2019

Upcoming Events