After shootings, threat tips roll in

This undated file photo released Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2019 by the Long Beach, Calif., Police Department shows weapons and ammunition seized from a cook at a Los Angeles-area hotel who allegedly threatened a mass shooting. There's been a big increase in the number of tips to U.S. law enforcement about potential mass shootings following the three shootings in August that killed 34 people.  (Long Beach Police Department via AP, File)
This undated file photo released Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2019 by the Long Beach, Calif., Police Department shows weapons and ammunition seized from a cook at a Los Angeles-area hotel who allegedly threatened a mass shooting. There's been a big increase in the number of tips to U.S. law enforcement about potential mass shootings following the three shootings in August that killed 34 people. (Long Beach Police Department via AP, File)

LOS ANGELES -- In the weeks after three high-profile shootings in three states took the lives of more than two dozen people in one week in August, law enforcement authorities nationwide reported a spike in tips from concerned relatives, friends and co-workers about people who appear bent on carrying out the next mass shooting.

Some of those would-be shooters sent text messages to friends or posted on social media that they hoped to one-up previous mass shootings by killing more people.

The reasons for the increase in tips and heightened awareness of thwarted mass shootings vary, law enforcement officials said.

In some cases, it's the "contagion effect" in which intense media coverage of mass shootings leads to more people seeking to become copycat killers. In other cases, it's a reflection of the public being more aware of warning signs when a friend or relative or co-worker is in an emotional crisis -- and more willing to tip off police.

On average, the FBI receives about 22,000 tips about potential threats of violence weekly. That volume increased by about 15,000 after the shootings during the first week of August in Gilroy, Calif.; El Paso, Texas; and Dayton, Ohio, that killed 34 people and wounded nearly 70.

Mass shootings tend to plant the idea of carrying out a rampage or at least encourage the idea in potential mass shooters, each seeking notoriety or striving to "out-do" others with higher death tolls, said sociologist James Densley, a criminal-justice professor at Metropolitan State University in St. Paul, Minn., who studies mass shootings and the people who perpetrate them.

And the public in turn becomes more aware of the possibility of mass shootings, heightening people's willingness to speak out if a friend, relative or co-worker appears to be in the midst of a crisis and plotting carnage, Densley said.

But identifying and predicting who the next shooter will be is challenging for authorities, he said.

Mass shootings remain rare events and there's no one basic profile for the attackers. The demographics of school shooters and their motivations are different from someone who carries out carnage in a place of worship. The same holds true for those who carry out workplace shootings.

"When it comes to thinking about the profile of a mass shooter what our research is starting to uncover is there's not really one profile of a mass shooter," Densley said.

But the one common thread is that there are usually warning signs in the days and weeks leading up to the shootings, with many shooters taking to social media to vent anger at whatever is troubling them.

Greg Shaffer, a retired FBI agent who now is a private security consultant specializing in shootings and terrorism, said in an interview that the challenge for law enforcement officials is the juggling act of trying to balance the public's safety while not trampling on Americans' constitutional rights.

"The real rub is where do you draw the line between First, Second and Fourth Amendment rights?" he said. "We allow hate speech. It's freedom of speech. Where do you decide that it's no longer posturing and now it's a threat? ... At what point do you crash his pad and take away his guns? You can't be the thought police."

The other challenge is more practical, said Houston Police Chief Hubert Acevedo. It's impossible for law enforcement agencies in real time to pore over social media posts and quickly isolate those showing that someone poses a real threat.

"There's just so much traffic on social media, in cyberspace, that it's like looking for a needle in a haystack," said Acevedo, the president of the Major Cities Chiefs Association representing police chiefs and sheriffs for the largest U.S. and Canadian cities.

The public's cooperation -- and people's willingness to risk angering a friend, relative or co-worker by informing on them-- is key to stopping mass shootings ahead of time, he said.

In Long Beach, Calif., where police disrupted possible plans to carry out a hotel attack, Police Chief Robert Luna thanked hotel employees for warning investigators.

"Instead of us visiting each other in hospitals or making funeral plans," Luna said, "we can talk about the courage you showed."

Luna welcomes the increase in tips to authorities about potential mass shooters, saying Long Beach residents have followed the "see something, say something" guidelines and report suspicious behavior to police.

"There are people, thank God, that are speaking up," he said. "It's not only 'see something' but if you hear something, if you read something, you absolutely have to say something."

A Section on 09/22/2019

Upcoming Events