Public profile for JakeTidmore
Comment history
To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.
MOST DISCUSSED STORIES
TOP JOBS
-
Qc inspector
Prospect Steel Local steel fabrication shop seeking a QC In...
Little Rock, AR -
Fiberglass technician
International Manufacturer seeks individual with 3yrs exper...
North Little Rock, AR -
Nurse manager
The Centers for Youth and Families seeks a to work in their...
LITTLE ROCK, AR -
Business office manager
LRHO A division of CARTI Little Rock Hematology/Oncology, a...
Little Rock, AR -
Accounting asst
Accounting AssistantIncluding ttrjatj
LITTLE ROCK, AR
LETTERS May 19, 2013 at 2:22 a.m.
Reincarnation makes more sense. Sort of a cosmic kharmic justice for how one deals with the world and its inhabitants. I see a significant increase in amoebae in the next life.
It certainly is a wonder that lowlifes threaten you with God and a trip to his special concentration camp. "Sieg Heil Jehovah" and "Let me make you an offer you'd better not refuse" have a certain cringe factor one should not ignore.
Rust to rust, assets to a$$es -- indomitable patricians.
( permalink | suggest removal )
LETTERS May 14, 2013 at 4:09 p.m.
Brad has no right to dictate to me his religious views or to insinuate that his brand of belief is the one and only and that no one else has the answer but himself. That's a tad bit egotistical, self-righteous, and wrong.
It's like some narcissistic fool bragging about his humility. It'll be a great week when the LTE page starts giving all their religious letters to the Religion section where they truly belong. I don't particularly care to be inundated with letters about angels on a pinhead or pinheads going on about angels or whatever makes them think they're better than other folks.
Sanctimonious drivel is a sign of a cult mentality.
( permalink | suggest removal )
LETTERS May 10, 2013 at 9:25 p.m.
Dang....we must be scraping the bottom of everyone's cranium if an argument depends on comparisons to a Happy Meal from McDonalds. Socrates must be rolling over in his grave.
( permalink | suggest removal )
UCA says no to concealed handguns on campus May 4, 2013 at 10:22 a.m.
My wife, a UCA grad, is very proud of her alma mater after reading this. Thank you UCA.
( permalink | suggest removal )
Pelosi says she 'prays' Hillary Clinton will run for president May 2, 2013 at 4:06 p.m.
Ahh...the sewer of hate ripens the air with its effluvia.
( permalink | suggest removal )
Even dressed up, it’s still crass May 2, 2013 at 4:01 p.m.
Glad you guys agree that Bell & Cotton are equally offending planks in their party's eyes. Maybe all parties will rid themselves of such lowlife.
But, wait a minute: you elected them. Gee, guess the fault really is yours (or mine, depending on which flavor the jerk of the week is).
( permalink | suggest removal )
LETTERS April 27, 2013 at 8:30 p.m.
Better idea -- let's elect different folks next time.
( permalink | suggest removal )
LETTERS April 26, 2013 at 9:51 p.m.
Which means that the Senate doesn't care what most Americans think. Right?
( permalink | suggest removal )
LETTERS April 26, 2013 at 7:14 p.m.
Pack _ although I mentioned where I got the study maybe I wasn't clear about it. It was posted on the Gun Shows in America site. But, before one can discuss data that I've asked for, it would help if some effort was made to show it first. That's all I've asked for.
Dime: thanks for the response. I did do some research on the inside/outside factor and found that one had to wade through a pile of opinions before seeing many facts (surprisingly -- most facts posted that I found came from police organizations). One such report hit the nail on the head: the loophole is not official, but it is unofficially there; it's called private sales.
And the key problem was two=fold: keep guns out of the hands of felons and those not supposed to be able to purchase them or have them PLUS increase crime prevention efforts, people and money wise.
( permalink | suggest removal )
LETTERS April 26, 2013 at 2:27 p.m.
Thanks for the comments though I still would like to see data that supports your contentions. Although I appreciate your firsthand recollections, personal experience is usually considered anecdotal not statistical. Also, I would prefer a non-biased source, if you know of any. (See previous comment for rationale on this....)
The loophole argument seems to be a semantics game from both sides. It's a matter of each side bringing their own preferred definitions to the table. That's why I seek a neutral source, if there is such on this debate. And thanks for the tip about inside and outside gun shows and where said "illegal" sales occur. I certainly will be investigating any data on that viewpoint of illegal gun sales.
As to enforcing laws or not enforcing them, again more data and research would be helpful. If a law is not enforced, then why? If it is enforced, what are the results? And, so on and so on, as one builds up an evidentiary picture of the problem(s).
( permalink | suggest removal )