Today's Paper Search Latest Core values App Traffic map In the news #Gazette200 Listen Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT

In several races for statewide office, the candidates with the most money didn't end up with the most votes on Election Day.

This story is only available from the Arkansas Online archives. Stories can be purchased individually for $2.95. Click here to search for this story in the archives.

Print Headline: GOP outspent in six contests for state posts

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • Dontcallmenames
    December 31, 2014 at 12:05 p.m.

    Dumbocrats try to fix everything with money, which just all goes wasted. The majority of the voters were fed up with these liars and the Republicans shouldn't have had to spend a dime on campaigning in order to win. The record of the Left spoke for itself.

  • Slak
    December 31, 2014 at 12:11 p.m.

    LOL@TheKochBrotherHaters
    Dems are worse than Koch.

  • Packman
    January 2, 2015 at 11:05 a.m.

    Wait, this can't be. Libs swear Republicans buy elections and is the only way Repubs can ever win. It simply cannot be true that Dems outspent Repubs. If true, this totally destroys one of the lib Dems' most sacred (false) narratives. The two things that scare libs most are facts and a real job. Bless their hearts.

  • Slak
    January 2, 2015 at 11:12 a.m.

    heh, the Koch bashers are crickets today. Koch hysteria proven baseless, LOL. Proglibs just as evil as conservative capitalists, LOL. We knew the noisome cries were proglib BS all along. ROTFLMAO@ProglibLiesUncovered

  • PopMom
    January 2, 2015 at 12:42 p.m.

    This article is very misleading because it does not take into consideration the money spent by the Kochs and other PACs.

  • Slak
    January 2, 2015 at 12:48 p.m.

    PopMom is misleading because her campaign money hysteria only extends to conservatives.

  • DontDrinkDatKoolAid
    January 2, 2015 at 1:43 p.m.

    Sum total (Hehehehe) Socialism was rejected.

  • Slak
    January 2, 2015 at 3:23 p.m.

    resoundingly, lol

  • NoUserName
    January 2, 2015 at 4:47 p.m.

    "This article is very misleading because it does not take into consideration the money spent by the Kochs and other PACs."
    .
    Perhaps not, but I recall the ADG article which noted that anti-Cotton money flowed at a higher rate than anti-Pryor money. As an example, of course.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT