Today's Paper Search Latest stories Traffic #Gazette200 Paper Trails Digital Replica FAQs Weather Newsletters Most commented Obits Puzzles + Games Archive

Bob Dole has a new project. Long a champion of this country's veterans, his own withered arm says more about his wartime service and sacrifice than any statue could. Now he's leading a peacetime campaign to get the long-planned Eisenhower Memorial in Washington finished while he and other members of his generation are still around to attend the dedication.

The problem is that the memorial's design is still more about its world-famous designer (Frank Gehry) than its subject. Even if a couple of statues, one of Eisenhower the general and the other of Eisenhower the statesman-president, have been added. Much as a couple of statues were added to the graceful Vietnam Memorial--just enough to mar its simple, sloping lines.

What do you think General and President Eisenhower would do? Wait till plans for his memorial mature, or do a hurry-up job memorial to meet an arbitrary deadline? It's impossible to know. Ike is far beyond such concerns now.

But we do know what the man did. He spent years putting together the grand coalition that liberated Europe, paying close attention to every detail, rather than speed up the invasion of Normandy. Till the day before the planned invasion, he was postponing it till the weather was right. And as president, he was a frugal chief executive who preferred balanced budgets to flashy effects.

We also know that the general's family objects mightily to the current hodgepodge of a design for his memorial, however it's been prettified here and there by a little statuary. Here's hoping the Eisenhowers stand fast against all these hurry-up-and-build-it pressures. Why build in haste only to repent at leisure?

The important thing is to get it right, not just to get it built.

Editorial on 08/03/2015

Print Headline: Do it right


Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments


  • Aristos
    August 3, 2015 at 11:05 p.m.

    Thanks for preventing me from reading my own comment or even knowing that others can read it. No other periodical I know of does this. I make frequent comments on the New York Times weblog ArtsBeat and at the Wall Street Journal, for example, and post links to articles and my comments in issues of Aristos. Both newspapers benefit from such exposure to potential subscribers. I don't subscribe because a a critic/scholar, I can't afford to do so for all the sources I cite. Neither paper limits visits to one. The Journal permits a lively exchange between commentators. I can only guess that the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette is too important a newspaper to follow these examples. Nice to know. - Louis Torres, Co-Editor, Aristos (An Online Review of the Arts)