Today's Paper Latest Coronavirus Cooking Families Core values Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Little Rock School District Superintendent Baker Kurrus is shown in this file photo. ( Stephen B. Thornton)

Superintendent Baker Kurrus said Tuesday that the Little Rock School District can't sustain its more than two dozen small elementary schools while trying to cut at least $40 million from its annual operating budget.

Photo by Source: Little Rock School District / Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Information about Little Rock School District enrollment.

Kurrus warned that the state's largest district is annually losing students of the middle- and upper-middle classes -- both black and white -- and is in jeopardy of becoming like the Detroit school system, which is, in large part, a shriveled district of last resort for students who don't have other school options.

"The Little Rock School District will not survive if all the kids it serves are children of great need," Kurrus said. "Don't think for a minute that we can continue to have students leave our school district who are easier to educate, more affluent and without special needs, and still have the good old Little Rock School District. It won't be there for you."

Speaking to almost 200 of the city's business and civic leaders at the Rotary Club of Little Rock's weekly meeting, Kurrus -- the state-appointed superintendent since May 6 -- gave a wide-ranging report on the good, the bad and the dire he's found in the district, which was taken over by the Arkansas Board of Education in January because of six academically distressed schools.

Kurrus projected onto screens in the Clinton Presidential Center's Great Hall pictures of happy children he has met in his frequent visits to the schools, often slipping in the back door, seeking out the custodians and eating lunch with the children. He said visiting the schools and meeting the students "makes it real." The students are not widgets but human beings with big dreams, he said.

He also said the state's largest district has huge challenges that include finding ways to compensate for the end of state desegregation aid after the 2017-18 school year, to operate more efficiently and to upgrade school buildings.

The district's total enrollment is 24,829 when 3- and 4-year old pre-kindergarten children are included in the count. Approximately 70 percent of students qualify for free and reduced-price school meals, an indication of low income. There are 2,657 special-education students this year, a number that is about 11 percent of its 23,164 kindergarten through 12th grade student enrollment. The district also has 2,855 students who are learning English as a second language.

He said the district "serves and loves every one" of its special-needs students.

"But if Little Rock School District becomes just the place where kids go when their parents don't elect to send them to private schools, don't elect to move them into other communities or don't elect to send them to charter schools," he said, 'then the Little Rock School District will not continue to exist" as it does now.

He said he is leaving it to the community to decide what to do.

"If you like Detroit, you are going to love Little Rock," he said. "It's that simple. I would be lying to you if I didn't tell you what I know and what I have learned from my studies, which is if we don't change, this community is going to be like Detroit."

Kurrus said he is working with the state-appointed Civic Advisory Committee to look at the possibility of reducing the number of schools in the district as a way to reduce costs.

The Little Rock district has 26 elementary schools of fewer than 500 pupils and six schools with more than 500, according to an Oct. 1 enrollment report on the Arkansas Department of Education website.

Draw circles with three-mile diameters around each of the Little Rock district's elementary schools, Kurrus told the civic club. Some pupils live within 1½ miles of four different Little Rock elementary schools, he said.

"It's not a sustainable model," said Kurrus, who has said the multiple small campuses result in expensive bus transportation costs and inefficient sharing of staff members such as nurses, counselors and music and art teachers.

"We've got to fix this," he said.

Greg Adams, a former Little Rock School Board member and co-chairman of the Civic Advisory Committee, said later Tuesday that a subcommittee is studying the data and the rationale for reducing the school numbers so that it can provide advice to the full committee and to Kurrus.

The subcommittee members include co-chairmen Marq Golden and Kathy Webb, as well as Adams, Joy Springer, Tiffani Jones and FrederickDickins, plus some student representatives.

"I find the argument that we are going to need fewer schools pretty compelling," Adams said, speaking as an individual, not for the advisory committee. "It's hard to imagine that we are going to be a healthy school district five or 10 years from now if we have the same amount of schools and the same amount of empty seats. I don't see that changing. I don't think that in a few years we are going to be able to fill those empty seats."

In contrast to the high number of small schools in the Little Rock district, the Springdale School District -- which is almost as large as Little Rock's district -- has just 17 elementary schools, the smallest of which has an enrollment of 499, he said.

Kurrus cited Roberts Elementary in west Little Rock as a model school. Roberts has about 900 students, the vast majority of whom are achieving academically at their appropriate grade levels.

"It's a great big beautiful school. It's brand new. It's state of the art. Every kid in Little Rock needs to go to a school that is just that good," he said, adding that the state desegregation aid to the district over the years should have been going toward new and improved school buildings.

The district will now have to find ways to cut $37.3 million in state aid from its $319 million budget, and find $10 million more to help finance a bond issue to pay for a new high school in southwest Little Rock and a middle school in the northwest part of the city.

That middle school could help the district retain some of the elementary school families who tend to leave the district when their children reach the age to go to middle school, he said. Two-thirds of the pupils who attend Roberts Elementary leave the district for their middle school and high school educations.

In response to a question from a Rotary Club audience member about the student loss, Kurrus said that the district needs to make sure all pupils finish elementary schools academically prepared for middle school. He said the district's state-labeled academically distressed middle and high schools are so categorized in part because students arrive at their campuses without the academic skills they should have learned at their previous schools.

"Parents want their kids to be around other kids who are on fire to learn," Kurrus said about families leaving the district.

He also said parents want their children to attend middle schools that are close to their homes, and the district is working on that in regard to the northwest part of the city.

The district had 29 more students this year on Oct. 1 than last year, but the increase was the result of the district enrolling a greater number of pre-kindergarten children.

Middle school enrollment fell this year from 5,134 last year to 5,037. High school enrollment dropped from 6,546 to 6,468 this year.

The district's black enrollment dropped from 16,273 last year to 16,184 this year. The white enrollment dropped from 4,451 to 4,354 this year. The enrollment of students classified as "other," increased from 4,076 to 4,291.

Kurrus told Rotary Club members that the district's enrollment of black students has remained relatively constant since the time of a 1998 settlement in a long-standing federal school desegregation lawsuit. That year the black enrollment was 16,753. The white enrollment, however, has dropped by half. The white enrollment in 1998 was 9,790. Only 294 students were listed as "other" that year.

Metro on 11/04/2015

Print Headline: Close schools to cut excess, LR chief says

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • Cadardo9
    November 4, 2015 at 5:01 a.m.

    Mr. Kurrus has taken the bull by the horns and is departing from maintaining the status quo. The LRSD School Board had not faced reality and the schools were failing our kids. Let's support him and his plan.

  • GCW
    November 4, 2015 at 6:05 a.m.

    The causes and solutions (if there are any) aren't on the campus.

  • Morebeer
    November 4, 2015 at 6:31 a.m.

    Is the story conflating special ed students with special needs students? 11% in special ed seems like a lot — more than one in ten are mentally disabled? At least Kurrus admits funding isn't really the problem, as it's a wealthy district. It's the inefficient spending that's been going on decades.

  • drs01
    November 4, 2015 at 8:51 a.m.

    Kurrus has publicly stated what many of us knew long ago. The LRSD has driven away the bright, enthusiastic, and affluent students, driven them away to surrounding communities, private schools, or Charter schools. They have pissed away millions in deseg dollars on bloated administrations,lawyers and buyouts. Today's paper also carried an article about the I-30 corridor that gives support to Kurrus' comments. 80% of the I-30 traffic is commuter, not through traffic. Parents have left Little Rock for a better education for their kids in surrounding cities while continuing to work here. If you think the problem with our schools is bad now....do nothing and be like Detroit.What a death sentence!! Now, where will the money come from??

  • JakeTidmore
    November 4, 2015 at 9:12 a.m.

    You seem to be an expert, drs01, at picking cause and effect out of the clear, blue air without providing some evidence to back your claim.
    --
    Care to explain why so many of the parents leaving were white?
    Care to comment on how white scores in LRSD were comparable with white scores in other school districts and explain how that is possible if LRSD teachers were doing such a bad job of educating the students? Care to explain why black students scores rose throughout the past 10 years yet the achievement gap could not be closed? Was this a case of teachers not doing their jobs? Would you care to explain how to maintain educational scores when there are such high percentages of special ed students and ESL students? Would you care to explain how LRSD was to deal with the over the top criticism so frequently published in the editorial columns of this paper, coming from a publisher who just happens to have a large stake in a charter school and is in bed with Wal-Mart who has a tremendous stake in charter schools?
    --
    You're a great one at explaining things drso1 as long as you don't have to consider troublesome facts.

  • cableguy
    November 4, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

    Thanks Mr. Kurris for telling the truth that many black parents that care about their child education are leaving the school district too. When will someone step up and tell the truth that our social programs and laws that encourages social irresponsibility are the root causes of this mess. We have women that have multiple children by criminals and no one says a word about it, not even the good man Hezekiah Stewart of Watershed because we don't want to hurt anyone feelings, especially women feelings. The only black leader I've seen speak against out of wedlock births was Malcolm X and that was ages ago. Meanwhile, we pay for housing these children, their food, alternative schools because parents don't know how to discipline, then when the children become adults we house them in our jails and prisons. I fear for my own children that they may become victims, possibly murdered by someone that come from a ghetto environment. Our nation can't afford this nonsense anymore. I will probably vote Republican for the first time in this next election.

  • TheRealBroncoFan
    November 4, 2015 at 9:59 a.m.

    To the CableGuy,
    It really amazes me when people such as yourself constantly state that minorities are the majority of social assistance. Simply put the majority that receive some type of government assistance are white. Go to any community outside of the Little Rock area and you will see single white mothers that receive assistance and white males that don't support their children. Matter of fact there are plenty of examples in Little Rock you just fail to acknowledge that fact. Simply put the welfare system needs to be revamped and it would be a surprise to some that don't actually find facts prudent when they spout off about ignorant stereotypes.

  • drs01
    November 4, 2015 at 10:01 a.m.

    Jake: You don't have to be an expert to read Kurrus' comments and repeat them here: "But if Little Rock School District becomes just the place where kids go when their parents don't elect to send them to private schools, don't elect to move them into other communities or don't elect to send them to charter schools," he said, 'then the Little Rock School District will not continue to exist" as it does now.
    You can continue to attack those of us who believe these FACTS as provided by a highly respected professional. Can you explain why white and black students are leaving the LRSD. ESTEM charter school has over 5000 on a waiting list. The majority of them are minorities. Something IS wrong....regardless of the questions you asked.

  • Bocepheus
    November 4, 2015 at 10:19 a.m.

    By 1998 the vast majority of white flight from the LRSD had occurred. What has been corrected in the LRSD from it's own consultant's (MGT) report issued in 1999, in part to respond to the white flight? In 1999, only 47% of our tax dollars were allocated to class room instruction---and now? 80% of all bussing was for convenience and not desgregation--true in 1999 and now? 8.5% of our tax dollars spent on business and administration vs.1.5% for other school distrcts of similar enrollment and tax revenue---true in 1999 and now? The list goes on and is too tiresome to reiterate ( to coin a phrase "at this point what differnce does it make?"), but the inescapable conclusion is that the LRSD has been a patronage factory for those in charge. For decades the LRSD's apologists obfuscated the district's poor academic performance, mostly by ad hominem attacks on those who wanted to assign responsibility--not blame. The LRSD is simply downsizing to meet the lack of current market demand and of course, the loss of the AR state subsidy.

  • cableguy
    November 4, 2015 at 10:28 a.m.

    To the RealBroncoFan,
    I've know people that work in a DHS office and heard the stories and I go to the hood, so I know first hand what's going on. I didn't say blacks make up the majority on welfare either. I don't fear those whites robbing or killing someone I love. A lot of those whites are content in their single-wide trailer. In the inner city where there is more public housing, they see the nice cars and big houses and they want it also. Unfortunately, they either have criminal records and/or don't have job skills to achieve the american dream. Many of them are addicted to drugs.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT