Today's Paper Search Latest App In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Paper Trails Listen Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption In this Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2015, photo, a notification posted on a door outside of the probate office states "there will be no marriage licenses by Washington County probate office issued by an Alabama probate judge, Nick Williams, a judge that is using a segregation-era law to avoid gay marriage in Chatom, Ala. - Photo by AP / BRYNN ANDERSON

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- In 1961, as Alabama's all-white Legislature tried to preserve racial segregation and worried about the possibility of mixed-race marriages, lawmakers rewrote state law to make it optional for counties to issue marriage licenses.

Now, some judges who oppose same-sex marriage are using the long-forgotten amendment to get out of the marriage business altogether rather than risk issuing even one wedding license to same-sex couples. In at least nine of Alabama's 67 counties, judges have quit issuing any marriage licenses since the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex unions in June.

While the precise reason that lawmakers gave for making the 1961 change has been lost to time, the 54-year-old provision says probate courts "may" issue rather than "shall" issue wedding licenses.

Nick Williams, a Baptist minister who also serves as probate judge in Washington County, is among those who have left the marriage-license business. He says issuing a license for a same-sex union would violate his Christian beliefs.

"It is a religious freedom issue, but more than that I believe it is a constitutional issue," said Williams, who last month cited the arrest of Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis in asking the Alabama Supreme Court to declare that officials don't have to allow same-sex marriage if doing so violates their religious beliefs.

Like Davis, Williams said he would go to jail before he would approve a marriage license for a same-sex couple.

Judges in three adjoining counties stopped issuing licenses for similar reasons, creating a region in southwestern Alabama where marriage licenses aren't available for 78,000 people. As a result, Bo Keahey and fiancee Hannah Detlefsen will have to spend nearly two hours on the road traveling to and from Monroe County before their November wedding because their native Clarke County has quit issuing licenses.

"I pay taxes here and it's kind of ridiculous that I can't get a license here," said Keahey, an attorney.

The drive might not be needed without that 1961 law.

With then-Gov. John Patterson pushing to maintain segregated public schools and Freedom Riders crisscrossing the South in opposition to integration, two Alabama legislators, Reps. F. LaMont Glass of Greenville and H.B. Taylor of Georgiana, introduced a bill to revamp the state's marriage law in May 1961.

Under a statute that went back decades, couples had to get marriage licenses in the county where the woman lived or where they planned to wed. The law had the effect of requiring each county to issue wedding licenses.

But that changed under Glass and Taylor's bill, according to the Alabama Legislative Reference Service, which researches laws and drafts legislation.

The new law, which records show passed unanimously, included this line: "Marriage licenses may be issued by the judges of probate of the several counties." Since the U.S. Supreme Court's June ruling, some same-sex marriage opponents have used that word "may" to avoid issuing marriage licenses. So far, no one has sued them.

The bill received virtually no news coverage at the time and its sponsors died years ago.

Former Gov. Albert Brewer, who was a young House member in 1961, said neither Glass nor Taylor was known as a hard-core segregationist, and they may have introduced the bill simply as a favor to a judge who didn't want to be bothered by issuing marriage licenses.

Or, Brewer said, it could have been a subtle way to block mixed-race marriages.

"Certainly they were talking about miscegenation at the time," said Brewer, 86.

A Section on 10/04/2015

Print Headline: Segregation-era law returns

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • ChrisVogel
    October 5, 2015 at 12:10 p.m.

    This is Alabama, after all. The stature governing issuance of Marriage Licences was amended so that judge would not have to issue licences to mixed race couples. Racism and homophobia are the same in the mind of the bigot.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT