Today's Paper Search Latest stories Listen Drivetime Mahatma Traffic Weather Newsletters Most commented Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
story.lead_photo.caption Joe Steinmetz (left), chancellor of the University of Arkansas, speaks Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, alongside Hunter Yurachek after Yurachek was introduced as the new director of athletics at the University of Arkansas during a news conference in the Fowler Family Baseball and Track Indoor Training Center in Fayetteville. - Photo by Andy Shupe

A close and smart friend once said he doesn't care what the Razorback Foundation does with his $20,000 yearly donation.

He doesn't want to vote on anything and doesn't fill out any ballots the Foundation sends him.

He just wants his football and basketball season tickets and decent parking. A sidebar to that is lately he hasn't attended many football games, so one could surmise he hasn't been getting the entertainment bang for his buck.

Other friends have been ticked off about the flow of money going out the front door, feeling they will have to make it up.

With donations ranging from $50 -- which doesn't really get you in the door but you can see it from there -- to the Broyles-Matthews Platinum level of the $20,000-plus, it is going to take some time.

On the front page of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on Tuesday was a story about how the Foundation is refusing to give up documents that had to do with the firing of Jeff Long and Bret Bielema and the more than $16 million they will be paid.

Both were state employees, and their incomes were being supplemented by the Foundation. This isn't a witch hunt by this or any other newspaper or TV station that has requested the information under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act.

It is simply a desire to present the facts to the Razorbacks Nation and the great people of this state.

That $16 million is a big number, and the financial obligations are growing because new Coach Chad Morris and new Athletic Director Hunter Yurachek mostly will be paid by the Foundation, too.

Every penny in the Foundation is donated by people who want to support the Razorbacks. It is their money.

That said, the Foundation does have a board made up of good, honest people. Executive Director Scott Varady is as honest as the day is long, although he's about as fond of Freedom of Information Act requests as he is losing football seasons.

It just seems for the last few years the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville and the Razorback Foundation have fought harder against transparency than for the rights of their fans and alums to know the facts.

Maybe it started to change when David Gearhart was the chancellor and the Advancement Department spent $3.8 million over its budget. That's a lot of money, and in the aftermath of that discovery a lot of reporters from various news outlets filed Freedom of Information Act requests.

Then-vice chancellor John Diamond, the person most responsible for handling the Freedom of Information Act requests, fought for transparency and eventually was fired. Diamond was liked by some and disliked by others. The book he later wrote, Please Delete, could be summed up as written by a disgruntled former employee, but by all accounts he tried to follow the letter of the law on Freedom of Information Act requests.

Yes, the Freedom of Information Act is a state law and the UA received $219 million tax dollars in 2015.

It is the flagship university in the state. It has educated some of the greatest people in this state, but when a school is the richest and biggest that comes with more scrutiny and accountability.

When more than $16 million can be spent to fire one athletic director and one coach -- and the total goes up again when you consider assistant coaches had a year left on their contract -- there is a need for transparency.

There should be extra concern now because President Trump's new tax plan has taken aim at the 80 percent tax write-off for athletic donations. Now is a time to save money and be accountable to those who are being counted on to donate more.


More headlines

Sports on 12/13/2017

Print Headline: Transparency lacking in UA sports spending


Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments


  • YoungHog
    December 13, 2017 at 12:36 p.m.


  • RP57
    December 13, 2017 at 3:37 p.m.

    Am I the only one who sees the irony in the fact that Wally has never had to spend a time of his own money to go to all the games he's attended over the years?

  • GeneralMac
    December 13, 2017 at 4:03 p.m.

    post #9 by Whippersnapper..................BINGO !

  • ASD68342008
    December 13, 2017 at 4:55 p.m.

    Transparency?? Where is the investigative reporting of the superstar AD Jeff Long, who created the lucrative contracts leading up to the said $16 million golden parachutes....???
    Wally and company praised JL for several years for strong leadership of the athletic department @ the UA-F.
    Now he is worked up over lacked record production at the Foundation???
    Call Jeffrey --- ask him .......

  • arkateacher54
    December 13, 2017 at 10:57 p.m.

    If I had $20,000 or $20 to donate to the Razorback Foundation (I don't) I think I would like to know what they were doing with my money. To me the RF seems like a subterfuge to hide a good amount of what the athletic department is up to by saying it is a "private" entity. For a private group it sure has a lot to do with the business of a public university. It should be subject to FOI laws. Typical of people with power and money to hide what they are doing from the public. I don't truly trust anybody employed by any kind of government agency that handles money or has access to it. Heck I'm a public employee and sometimes I am ashamed of myself. What's up with having to make huge donations to get Razorback tickets anyway? The UA belongs to the people of the state and so does the dang football team. My sister paid $6 for a ticket (no donation) for me to go to my first Razorback game in 1969. I guess the Hogs really belong to the rich and famous.