Today's Paper Latest stories 2018 election city/county races Most commented Obits Traffic Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games

Some of President Donald Trump's biggest fans have declared war against special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. And given Trump's television-watching habits, he's surely listening.

"Mueller is corrupt. The senior FBI is corrupt. The system is corrupt," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said on Fox News recently.

"A disgrace to the American justice system," Fox News host Sean Hannity, a Trump favorite, declared. "The head of the snake." Mueller has put the country "on the brink of becoming a banana republic," he charged.

"Mueller poses an existential threat to the Trump presidency," warned Christopher Ruddy, a longtime Trump friend who runs the conservative Newsmax website.

Even the Wall Street Journal published an editorial calling on the special counsel to quit. "Mueller is too conflicted to investigate the FBI and should step down in favor of someone more credible," the newspaper argued.

Other conservatives, including members of Congress, have joined a chorus of complaints about the special counsel, the FBI and the Justice Department--even though all three are led by Trump appointees.

It all looks and sounds like a concerted campaign to delegitimize Mueller's investigation, launched in May to look into evidence that Russia tampered with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Trump's most fervent supporters disliked the idea from the start, but anti-Mueller fury stepped up markedly after the prosecutor indicted former national security advisor Michael Flynn this month. Flynn's cooperation could enable Mueller to charge Trump with obstruction of justice, although there's no sign that the prosecutor plans to take that step.

The anti-Mueller campaign isn't just noisy. It's dangerous. Gingrich, Hannity and Ruddy are people Trump listens to. Fox News is the channel he watches. Whether or not they persuade the president that he ought to fire Mueller, they are clearly paving the way by convincing Trump's political base, the Fox News-watching public, that dismissing the prosecutor would be justified.

A CBS News Poll this month found that Americans overall are evenly divided over whether Mueller's investigation is fair or politically motivated. But there was a stark partisan split: 81 percent of Republicans said the probe is politically motivated, while only 23 percent of Democrats agreed. That suggests that if Trump fired Mueller, he would get nearly automatic support from his party's voters.

Despite the high volume, the case against Mueller is thin.

One major talking point is that although the special counsel is a Republican, many of the lawyers he has hired are Democrats. Six of Mueller's top 15 aides donated money to Hillary Clinton's campaign, according to Politifact; at least one gave to Republicans.

Critics have also complained that some of the FBI agents working on the investigation also worked on the 2016 investigation of Clinton's emails, which they consider a whitewash. Among them, one agent has attracted particular attention: Peter Strzok, who was moved off the team by Mueller after he sent a derisive text message about Trump. GOP members of Congress are particularly angry that they didn't learn about the incident until months later.

And they have charged that Mueller aide Andrew Weissmann, a career Justice Department official, is biased. The Wall Street Journal reported recently that Weissmann attended Hillary Clinton's election night party in November.

So, yes, the investigation--like every other part of the federal bureaucracy--includes Democrats. There's no cure for that. Federal regulations prohibit the Justice Department from considering career appointees' political affiliation.

That didn't stop House Republicans from criticizing FBI Director Christopher Wray, another Trump appointee, when he appeared before them last week.

"If you kicked everybody off of Mueller's team who was anti-Trump, I don't think there'd be anyone left," griped Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

"I am emphasizing in every audience I can inside the bureau that our decisions need to be made based on nothing other than the facts and the law," Wray replied. "I'm not aware of any senior FBI executives who are allowing improper political considerations to affect their work."

Trump's lawyers say he's never even considered firing the special counsel. But experts who worked on earlier investigations, both Republicans and Democrats, told me that Trump is essentially free to fire Mueller and in effect shut the inquest down, if he's willing to take some political heat.

That doesn't mean Mueller's evidence will disappear. It will remain in the hands of the Justice Department.

Editorial on 12/17/2017

Print Headline: A dangerous anti-Mueller campaign

Sponsor Content


You must be signed in to post comments
  • RBear
    December 17, 2017 at 8:19 a.m.

    So far I have seen no bias by Mueller in the investigation to this point. He has also purged the team of agents who had text messages that may have presented a conflict of interest. Now the political contributions are up for debate. Rumors have been flying that Trump will fire Mueller by Christmas. Today, Sen. Cornyn (R-TX) said that will not happen, but we'll see.
    If Trump does fire Mueller it can only be considered an indication that there is guilt in the White House and Trump wants to purge the investigation before it gets too close. If Trump pardons Flynn, it offers even more suspicion and possible an obstruction of justice.

  • BoudinMan
    December 17, 2017 at 5:11 p.m.

    This is our "law and order" president. He's all for law and order in his speeches, but the minute they pose a threat to him, he insults them. If it's not the FBI. it's the CIA. Hell, even his idol, Putin, gave the CIA a compliment for thwarting a bomb plot. The same CIA trump disparaged and attacked earlier this year.

    December 17, 2017 at 6:53 p.m.

    Trump said today he has no plans to fire Mueller.

    Trump lies on a daily basis.

    I really hope Trump tries to fire him.

    That'd be the best Christmas gift ever, next to the Russian hooker pee tape.

  • Packman
    December 17, 2017 at 8:08 p.m.

    No Mr. McManus, what's dangerous is a writer for the LA Times writing a bullsh*t article slanted to falsification. That Strzok doofus didn't just send a single damning text. He sent a whole slew of them to his fellow cheating spouse. In addition to other evidence of bias as noted in the article there is evidence that suggests the wife of a Hillary cultists DOJ official ordered and helped craft the now infamous Trump dossier.
    The fact is evidence has been uncovered that calls into question the impartial nature of the investigation but worse evidence of a conspiracy within the FBI to discredit this nation's electoral processes. Again I ask, who investigates the investigators?

  • RBear
    December 17, 2017 at 8:39 p.m.

    Pack, let me ask you. Is he still on the investigative team? Your retraction is accepted.

    December 17, 2017 at 9 p.m.

    Remember when Republicans possessed an iota of dignity and decency?

    I'm old enough to remember.

    Hell, I was one.

    And's the party of Trump, Putin's puppet. Sad.

  • Packman
    December 17, 2017 at 9:11 p.m.

    Hey RBear - No. What's your point? Anything the rogue agent touched in the investigation, anyone he talked to, any material he gathered, is tainted. As is the work of his illicit lover. The roll of all investigators that supported Hillary is also highly susceptible to bias. The investigation must end to preserve the integrity of the FBI.
    Hey amgoo - You still say Sarah Sanders is a"whore"? Yet, you speak of "dignity and decency". Moron. Amgoo is a special kind of hypocritical moron.

    December 17, 2017 at 9:22 p.m.

    Totes hilaires.

    He really doesn't get it, does he?

    December 17, 2017 at 9:42 p.m.

    Those who question Mueller's integrity do so because they know Trump is guilty.

  • DontDrinkDatKoolAid
    December 17, 2017 at 10:55 p.m.

    Those who question Mueller's integrity, do so because they know Mueller's history.