Today's Paper Latest stories 2018 election city/county races Most commented Obits Traffic Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Sen. Jake Files, R-Fort Smith, is shown in this file photo.

FORT SMITH -- Two contractors say state Sen. Jake Files prepared and submitted bids under their companies' names without their knowledge.

Files says they're not telling the truth.

The Fort Smith Republican says he wrote the quotes in December "after talking to each of the principals in the companies." He says he has call records and texts to prove it, but he didn't have them available to share with a reporter late last week.

The bids dispute is the latest question surrounding a $46,500 state-paid General Improvement Fund grant that Files acknowledges was his idea to pursue.

For decades, General Improvement Fund grants -- tax money made available to individual legislators for pet projects -- have generated controversy.

The purpose of the Fort Smith General Improvement Fund grant was to install water and sewer lines to help complete construction of a $1.6 million softball complex for the city of Fort Smith. The project was managed by a Files-operated company, River Valley Sports Complex.

Obtaining the grant involved a regional planning agency, the city and three required bids, according to interviews and records obtained by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

After the planning agency awarded the grant to the city, more than $26,000 of it was paid to the low bidder -- Dianna Gonzalez of Pocola, Okla.

In an interview late last week, Files identified Gonzalez as a subcontractor who helped his company obtain work in the past. She is not an employee, he said.

Gonzalez could not be reached for comment and did not respond to a note left at her home. State records don't show a contractor's license or company listed in her name.

[EMAIL UPDATES: Get free breaking news alerts, daily newsletters with top headlines delivered to your inbox]

The dispute over who prepared the two bids led the city to stop three years of work on the ballpark project in the city's Chaffee Crossing development.

River Valley Sports Complex, operated by Files and business partner Lee Webb, had managed the project's construction since 2014.

Files considered the ballpark "volunteer work" by his nonprofit company, he said.

But by the time the city canceled its contract with River Valley Sports on Feb. 7, it had paid the company $1.08 million, records show.

The project is unfinished, unusable and months behind schedule, city officials say.

The two contractors who say Files submitted bids in their companies' names told the Democrat-Gazette late last week that they knew nothing about those bids until Fort Smith city staff members began asking questions.

"The city came to me and showed me" the bid, said Osvaldo Ambriz, who operates Lego Construction LLC of Greenwood. "I said I never did it."

He said his company doesn't do utility work.

"My company does only framing work. We work with wood. Look at my license," said Ambriz, a carpentry, framing and cabinet contractor. "This guy is using my name without authorization."

In an email, electrical contractor Jason Williams of Williams Power & Lighting Inc. of Pocola said: "I was contacted by a lady from the City of Fort Smith about a quote that we never sent to them on that project."

Williams said the submitted quote looks nothing like what his company prepares.

"I believe there may have been something fishy going on out there," he said.

City directors and staff members had worried for months about the slow progress on the ball-field project, according to email records obtained by the newspaper. City officials confirmed the concerns in interviews.

Then in January, city staff members learned about what their attorney termed "irregularities" in the bidding process for the state grant.

To secure a grant of more than $10,000 and less than $50,000, state procurement laws require the submission of quotes, according to Sasha Grist, director of the agency that awarded the grant -- Western Arkansas Planning & Development District.

Those quotes should come from three different individuals or companies, Grist said.

Competitive, independent bidding is important, said Carl Circo, a professor at the University of Arkansas School of Law in Fayetteville.

"First, to assure the public that projects funded by public funds are awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. It's a matter of relying on competition to protect the public purse," Circo wrote in an email. "For this reason, the process is commonly referred to as competitive bidding."

Files, chairman of the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee, says that, because he called the other contractors in advance, "I felt like they were competitive bids."

"I didn't put much more thought into it than that, though," he said.

'Don't see conflict'

The Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board doesn't list a Dianna Gonzalez as a licensed contractor; nor does it list a Dianna Shuffett, as a records search shows she is also known.

Oklahoma's Construction Industries Board, which issues licenses by trade, doesn't show either name as holding a roofing, building inspection, electrical, mechanical or plumbing license. Oklahoma doesn't license resident construction contractors outside of those trades.

The Arkansas secretary of state's corporation look-up website doesn't list Gonzalez as a corporation name or agent.

The two contractors who say they knew nothing of losing bids submitted in their companies' names are licensed in Arkansas and are listed on the secretary of state's website.

In an interview and in written responses, Files said Gonzalez has worked for another of his companies, FFH Construction LLC.

She "prepared flyers advertising FFH Construction in an effort to get further work. She has never been an employee, but has subcontracted work from FFH in the past," he wrote.

Asked if Gonzalez holds a contractor's license under any name, he replied, "Not that I know of."

Asked if such a license is required for the work she does, he wrote: "The state law is that contracts under $50,000 do NOT require a contractor's license."

When he learned that the General Improvement Fund grant would require three bids, Files said in an interview that Gonzalez had already submitted hers to his business partner Webb.

"I called the other guys," Files said of the other contractors, who say those calls never happened.

Files said he called the electrical contractor, Williams, because "laying the pipe was no different than laying electrical conduit."

He called the framing contractor, Ambriz, because "he does all kinds of stuff -- dry wall, painting."

Asked if he or Gonzalez will return the $26,945.91 wired to her bank on Dec. 30 from the state General Improvement Fund grant, Files wrote: "The money was not given to me. I will certainly assist in the return of any unused funds when asked to do so."

Files said he sees no conflict of interest or ethical concerns in preparing two of the bids, or in suggesting that the city apply for the General Improvement Fund grant, or in approving its award as a state senator, then seeing the grant go to a subcontractor for his own company.

"I don't see any conflict at all or ethical concerns, as we were just volunteers trying to build a sports complex at close to 20 percent of what it would have cost to bid one out and complete it," he wrote.

Files and Webb have said they would build most of the project with volunteer materials and labor, beyond the $1.6 million the city was to provide.

Grant timeline

By all accounts, the idea of applying for the General Improvement Fund grant originated with Files.

The goal was to "jump-start" the lagging Chaffee Crossing ballpark project, according to city administrator Carl Geffken.

Files suggested that the city apply for the grant through the Western Arkansas Planning & Development District, he said. The city did.

Files also acknowledged that as a state senator, he gives his approval to the planning district to award grants in the Fort Smith area. The agency routinely checks with state legislators to get their approval before awarding General Improvement Fund grants in their districts.

The planning district approved the grant in mid-December, records show. The city signed an agreement with River Valley Sports to manage it..

But before the district would issue a check, district staff members told the city and Files, it needed three price quotes for the water and sewer line work, Grist said.

Files submitted the following bids to the Western Arkansas Planning & Development District in late December, she said:

• Williams Power & Lighting Inc., dated Dec. 5, for $60,165.91.

• Lego Construction, dated Nov. 21, for $54,145.91

• Dianna Gonzalez, dated Dec. 8, for $47,545.91.

The telephone number on the Gonzalez bid has been disconnected. The address was listed as 14078 State Line Road in Pocola. But a W-9 IRS form for her, which Files says he filled out and signed for her because she didn't have a printer, listed the street address as 1407A.

After receiving the bids, the planning district issued a check for $46,500 to the city of Fort Smith on Dec. 30.

Gonzalez submitted an invoice to the city dated that same day for "mobilization, purchase of materials, layout and 50 percent total labor" totaling $26,945.91.

The city, under what officials say was urging from Files, wired the invoice amount that day to Gonzalez's bank account in Muskogee, Okla.

In early January, the Western Arkansas Planning staff began reviewing the price quotes for the Chaffee Crossing ballpark work and noticed problems, Grist said.

They couldn't find records for Gonzalez's company. And all three companies' bids used identical supporting quotes from the same supply company. The supplier quotes were more than 18 months old.

Grist sent a letter to Geffken, the Fort Smith city administrator, on Jan. 11. The city began investigating.

On Jan. 27, Geffken and another staff member met with Files. They asked him to have Gonzalez accompany him. She attended.

Attorney Michael Jones, hired by the city to look into the contract with River Valley Sports Complex, wrote a Jan. 31 letter saying "irregularities surrounding RVSC actions in procuring bids" could violate "laws or regulations of any public body having jurisdiction."

Because of the bidding and other concerns, Jones said the city was within its rights to terminate the contract with River Valley Sports Complex.

SundayMonday on 02/19/2017

Print Headline: In dark on bids Files submitted, companies say

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • YOUNGT104
    February 19, 2017 at 9:44 a.m.

    Files is another self serving politician and a crook. He needs to resign from his seat in the Senate and never run for political office again. It is amazing that the self righteous can give kids away, that they are collecting state funds for, steal money from grants or take kickbacks for grants they help secure but are never asked to step down for the good of the party, their constituents and the State. They are God's chosen ones according to the Nut from Faulkner County. More and more it seems that they are Lucifer's chosen ones unless the Ten Commandments are wrong...!!!

  • LR1955
    February 19, 2017 at 10:03 a.m.

    I use to see this kind of "comp bids" BS, it was fairly common if the work was being steered towards a particular company. Sometimes the favored company contacted a couple friendly competitors who would submit bids close but higher than the favored company. On the next one, the favor was reversed. if it's done correctly, ethically, and legally, 3 RFQs go out and the low bid gets it. In this case it appears the awarded contractor was just under the amount that allows this loose form of bids and most likely the work could have been done for less, so allegedly the legislator formulated higher bids so his buddy wold get the work. Amazing there was an invoice ready to go and the project was half complete on the day the contract/money was awarded. Dirty Dirty Dirty

  • Foghorn
    February 19, 2017 at 10:09 a.m.

    Lawdy, lawdy...this stinks to high heaven. Over $1million of AR taxpayer dollars going to a state senator forging bids who claims his 'nonprofit' business was doing 'volunteer' work. And $26,000 going to a female associate of his who isn't in fact a contractor, goes by more than one name and who now can't be located. This will not end well. AR taxpayers won't recoup our money and at least 2 people sound like they might be headed to lockup.

  • Jeeper85
    February 19, 2017 at 11:43 a.m.

    I am not an expert in the law which would apply, but something in my memory makes me think that the actions described in these matters may come under the jurisdiction of the FBI as Interstate fraud. Whether or not that is correct, one or more Arkansas law enforcement agencies should be investigating Senator Files, his partner, etc,

  • GoBigRed
    February 19, 2017 at 12:13 p.m.

    There used to be sweetheart deals with copier bids in State offices. An official would get a contract for the copiers in an agency at a certain price. Some would be like 1,000 copies a month plus 10 cents for each overage copy. Then they would farm that out to one of the actual copy companies at a lesser cost with an agreement say 2,000 copies plus 5 cents per overage.

  • TuckerMax
    February 19, 2017 at 9:53 p.m.

    One key to the scam of false bids: the repetition of the 91 cents at the end. It's a subconscious action that auditors look for. He's lying, and he's in the sights of the FBI, too. He should call Mr. Lane and compare notes about what it's like to go through an FBI investigation into misuse of public funds ....

  • NRC
    February 20, 2017 at 10:07 a.m.

    Administering nonprofit charities pays high-income.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT