Today's Paper Latest Elections Coronavirus 🔵 Covid Classroom Cooking Families Core values Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON -- An energy project that is sharply opposed by members of the all-Republican Arkansas congressional delegation was on President Donald Trump's pre-inauguration "priority list" of "emergency and national security projects," according to a document obtained by the Kansas City Star and released Tuesday.

A spokesman for the president cautioned late Tuesday that the list is not a White House policy document.

An article by the Star and the McClatchy Washington Bureau described it as "a first glimpse at which projects around the country might get funding."

The Plains and Eastern Clean Line would carry wind-generated electricity from the Oklahoma panhandle to Memphis, running across the entire state of Arkansas. Once the electricity reaches the power grid in Tennessee, it could be routed, potentially, across the southeastern United States.

[PRESIDENT TRUMP: Details on administration, previous coverage, photos, videos]

The privately funded, 720-mile-long, $2.5 billion project was listed as No. 9 among the new administration's 50 infrastructure priorities.

"This is a national security project that can add resiliency to our electrical grid," the pre-inauguration document stated.

Houston-based Clean Line Energy Partners has fought to secure government approval for their project, which would carry 4,000 megawatts, enough power to supply 1 million homes, company officials said. The line would enter Arkansas just north of Van Buren and would exit the state south of Wilson in Mississippi County, if the preferred route were adopted.

[EMAIL UPDATES: Get free breaking news alerts, daily newsletters with top headlines delivered to your inbox]

The list was released on the same day that Trump signed an "Executive order expediting environmental reviews and approvals for high priority infrastructure projects."

It calls for streamlining and expediting, "in a manner consistent with law, environmental reviews and approvals for all infrastructure projects, especially projects that are a high priority for the Nation, such as improving the U.S. electric grid and telecommunications systems and repairing and upgrading critical port facilities, airports, pipelines, bridges, and highways."

The total estimated cost for the 50 projects would be $137.5 billion, though 50 percent would come from private investment, the pre-inauguration document stated.

The top priority, known as the Gateway Program, is a $12 billion reconstruction of the Northeast Corridor rail lines linking New York City and Newark, N.J.

The Clean Line project is the only Arkansas project on the list. Opponents have been battling for years to block it.

Critics say the project would harm property values and could threaten migrating waterfowl, and they question whether the energy is needed.

Supporters say the project would be environmentally friendly and provide a huge amount of renewable energy that would have a smaller carbon footprint than traditional power plants do.

The Oklahoma-to-Tennessee transmission line received approval from President Barack Obama's administration in March. But efforts are underway in Congress to derail any federal approval.

U.S. Sen. John Boozman of Rogers, Ark., sponsored legislation that would prevent the federal government from "using the power of eminent domain to implement modernization of electricity transmission infrastructure" unless it receives permission from the governors and public utility commissions of the states where the property would be taken.

U.S. Rep. Steve Womack, also of Rogers, filed a House version of the bill, as well.

U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton of Dardanelle, Ark., co-sponsored Boozman's legislation. Arkansas' U.S. Reps. French Hill of Little Rock, Bruce Westerman of Hot Springs and Rick Crawford of Jonesboro are co-sponsors of the House version.

Known as the Assuring Private Property Rights Over Vast Access to Land (Approval) Act, it cleared the House Natural Resources Committee by a vote of 19-11, but it never came up for a vote in the full House.

The sponsors continue to have concerns about the project, their spokesmen said in written statements.

"While Congressman Womack is still reviewing the document, he remains firmly opposed to this unprecedented Obama Administration project that takes land from rural Arkansans to subsidize clean energy initiatives for the benefit of a private entity," Womack spokesman Claire Burghoff said.

Boozman spokesman Patrick Creamer had a similar reaction.

"We are reviewing the document, but the Senator remains firmly opposed to the project and will continue to fight against this lingering overreach of the Obama administration," he said.

Crawford said in a written statement that his position on the project has not changed.

"Opponents of the clean line energy plan include individual property owners and agriculture producers who almost unanimously said the same thing -- this was an executive overreach by President Obama. I don't believe President Trump should consider backing such an unpopular program," he said.

Metro on 01/25/2017

Print Headline: Trump list backs project resisted by state's 6

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • 23cal
    January 25, 2017 at 7:20 a.m.

    "We are reviewing the document, but the Senator remains firmly opposed to the project and will continue to fight against this lingering overreach of the Obama administration," he said."
    *
    Apparently it is now overreach of the Trump administration. Bwahahahahahaha!
    Just watch: if it comes to completion under Trump, they will still blame Obama, as if Trump had nothing to do with it.

  • Patricewolfe
    January 25, 2017 at 8:29 a.m.

    I hope the Clean Line Project is killed immediately!! In an effort to get rid of coal, this loser scheme was developed by Obama's delusional environmentalists. To take Arkansans property for this stupid idea is wrong!

  • BoudinMan
    January 25, 2017 at 8:49 a.m.

    23 cal, you are so spot on. Just reference the comment above mine. Wolfie, while it might be an Obama initiative (oh, horror of horrors), your short-fingered vulgarian will be responsible for putting it in practice. Deal with it.

  • 3WorldState1
    January 25, 2017 at 9:47 a.m.

    Hi Patrice, what do you think the Keystone Pipeline fight is about? Seriously. Do you even hear yourself? The Keystone pipeline gives a foreign, PRIVATE company eminent domain power to take Americans people's land. And not send electricity over it but dirty ass oil over their drinking water.
    So not in your back yard? That seems kind of selfish. So you don't mind your other fellow Americans getting screwed as long as it doesn't happen to you? Fo shame.
    There's hypocrisy and then there's republican hypocrisy.

  • hurricane46
    January 25, 2017 at 10:32 a.m.

    These guys are all for the Keystone pipeline which will harm their water supply and probably ruin some sacred tribal grounds, but running wind-generated energy through Arkansas is a no-no? Cotton and Bozo and the rest of the circus in D.C. representing us just don't make sense sometimes, but then again, they never have.

  • Knuckleball1
    January 25, 2017 at 12:58 p.m.

    Senators, you can't have it both ways...!!!! It is ok to run pipe lines under other peoples drinking water (pipe lines don't leak do they.. Mmmmm ask Mayflower) but it is not ok to run a power line across the state that should not harm any ones drinking water...!!!! You took this oath of office. The current oath was enacted in 1884:• I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
    Senators, I was taught in school that you are to take care of the Nation before your state. How about standing up for all peoples rights.... not just those in Arkansas..

  • GoUSA
    January 25, 2017 at 2:07 p.m.

    The Federal Government extending eminent domain power to enrich billionaires' LLC at the expense of private land owners is Un-American. That is one problem with this proposed transmission line. After years of "selling" the project, they have no customers. Zero. None. Mainly because it is not "clean" energy when you peel back layers of PR propaganda to get to the real facts. This is governmental overreach. If approved, this project with be the first time the Dept. of Energy has "taken" property for private gain under the Energy Act of 2005 section 1222. Wonder why they chose to "test the waters" in the state of Arkansas with this pay to play type project? Every Arkansasan and every private land owner in America should be outraged over this potential loss of liberty. Say no to eminent domain for private gain. Just not right....

  • TimberTopper
    January 25, 2017 at 2:59 p.m.

    The dictator is on the move, and his supporters are saying YEA! Just a matter of time until he moves against them!

  • carpenterretired
    January 25, 2017 at 8:19 p.m.

    The boys in the turnip truck will at some point in time have their turn at being screwed by Trump ,but until that time they will be loyal goose steppers in Trump's fascist parade (true some of the boys may be to old to goose step and may have to use their turnip truck for a parade float).

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT