Today's Paper Search Latest In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Digital replica FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Sen. David Sanders speaks to the Senate on Thursday about the bill he co-sponsored, which places restrictions on a second-trimester abortion method. - Photo by Mitchell PE Masilun

Arkansas joined a half-dozen other states that have enacted restrictions on a common procedure for second-trimester abortions, with Gov. Asa Hutchinson signing the legislation hours after the Senate passed it Thursday.

The enactment of House Bill 1032, which restricts dilation and evacuation abortions, prompted the American Civil Liberties Union to promise to file a lawsuit against the state.

The bill, debated for 20 minutes in the Republican-majority Senate, makes it a felony to perform the procedure except to prevent a "serious health risk" to the mother. The ban does not include exceptions for rape and incest. The law takes effect 90 days after the current regular legislative session ends.

Courts in four of the six states with similar laws have delayed such bans from taking effect. Only Mississippi and West Virginia have implemented bans on the procedure.

Abortion opponents and the Republican sponsors of the legislation referred to the procedure as "dismemberment abortion," which they described as especially heinous and potentially dangerous to the mother.

But critics of the law point to dilation and evacuation as being the near-universally chosen method by doctors to end pregnancies in the second trimester. An alternative, medically inducing labor, has a greater risk of complications, according to the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

[EMAIL UPDATES: Get free breaking news alerts, daily newsletters with top headlines delivered to your inbox]

In Arkansas, dilation and evacuation was the only method used to end pregnancies beyond 12 weeks in 2015, according to Arkansas Department of Health statistics, and the method accounted for 638 of the 3,771 abortions performed in the state that year. The state bans abortions past the 19th week of pregnancy.

The Senate voted 25-6 in favor of the bill, sending it to Hutchinson, a Republican, who signed it in the afternoon, according to a spokesman. All six "nays" came from Democrats, while three members of the minority party voted in favor of the restriction.

Rep. Andy Mayberry, the lead sponsor of HB1032 and president of Arkansas Right to Life, said he was optimistic that the law would take effect later this year.

"There were promises of lawsuits," Mayberry said. "I hope it's not challenged, but I'm very confident that it is written in such a way that it will withstand judicial scrutiny."

A lawsuit seeking to block the law from taking effect will be filed by the ACLU of Arkansas, the group's executive director, Rita Sklar, said Thursday.

"This is not going to stand up to court scrutiny, and I think the sponsor and everyone who voted for this knew so," Sklar said.

Unlike in the House, where Mayberry's bill passed without debate, several Democrats in the Senate stood to voice concerns that lawmakers were subverting the medical opinion of doctors who use the procedure. Debate on the bill lasted about 20 minutes.

"I'm well aware that I'm not gonna change any minds," said Sen. Will Bond, D-Little Rock, after speaking against the bill.

The Senate sponsor of the bill, Sen. David Sanders, R-Little Rock, described the restriction as a compromise with abortion-rights supporters who echo former President Bill Clinton's sentiment in favor of "safe, legal and rare" abortions.

But Planned Parenthood of the Great Plains released a statement from CEO Laura McQuade calling the passage of the bill "an attempt to ban safe, legal abortion because of the ideology of a few elected officials under the dome."

"We will support any and all efforts to defend our patients' constitutional rights to safe, legal abortion," the statement said.

Later Thursday, lawmakers in the House passed legislation allowing parents to receive death certificates at their requests for miscarriages or stillbirths that occur after the 12th week of pregnancy. A previous law allowed for certificates to be issued past the 20th week of pregnancy, or for fetuses weighing more than 350 grams.

Photo by KELLY KISSEL / AP
Gov. Asa Hutchinson visits with reporters in his office Thursday to discuss a bill restricting an abortion procedure. Hutchinson later signed the bill, which will take effect 90 days after the end of the regular legislative session.

The sponsor of House Bill 1185, Rep. David Meeks, R-Conway, said he was responding to constituents who had been unable to receive death certificates after miscarriages, although the provision could also apply to parents who request certificates after abortions.

Speaking at a weekly meeting of the Conservative Caucus on Wednesday, Family Council President Jerry Cox said the group plans to support five anti-abortion pieces of legislation during the regular legislative session, with the stated goal of making Arkansas the "No. 1 pro-life state."

Mayberry said he had no plans to put forward additional abortion legislation this year, but he didn't doubt that other proposals could arise in the Legislature.

"I still think there are plenty of things that can be done," Mayberry said.

A Section on 01/27/2017

Print Headline: Governor signs bill on abortion

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments

Comments

  • BillMurray
    January 27, 2017 at 5:55 a.m.

    So, they've banned a near-universally chosen method by doctors (experts), because they feel it's especially heinous and potentially dangerous to the mother, yet the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (experts) say the alternative method has a greater risk of complications. ... Gotcha. How lucky are we to have a legislative body that's more knowledgable of abortion procedures than the medical community!

  • LR1955
    January 27, 2017 at 7:07 a.m.

    I've read several stories online of families visiting their ob/gyn for a routine 2 trimester check up and the developing baby had developed serious complications and would be born dead, or die w/ in hours, with suffering & pain involved.
    So are third trimester abortions completely banned already?
    Is this new law banning all second trimester abortions
    or just this one particular procedure?

  • HawgFan
    January 27, 2017 at 7:12 a.m.

    Good for Asa!!! Glad to see him standing up for the unborn children who can't stand up for themselves.

  • TimberTopper
    January 27, 2017 at 8:13 a.m.

    HawgFan, don't ever bitch about taxpayer monies going to the poor for food, housing, medical treatments, crime, and or prison costs. You just gave up that right!

  • HawgFan
    January 27, 2017 at 8:25 a.m.

    Timber... Please explain.

  • iehaymaker
    January 27, 2017 at 9:17 a.m.

    I questioned my State Representative about his opposition to this bill, which I am for. He had several legal reasons, then said this (I quote his exact words) "The end result of that is that this law will reduce the number of abortions using this procedure in Arkansas by exactly zero."
    Based on this article, that does not seem to be the case. Can someone enlighten me?

  • HawgFan
    January 27, 2017 at 9:26 a.m.

    iehaymaker... It appears your State Representative that is opposed to the bill is ignoring the facts presented by the Arkansas Department of Health statistics that, in 2015, this bill would have saved 638 lives.

  • 23cal
    January 27, 2017 at 9:38 a.m.

    Perhaps we should leave the decision on what medical techniques are best to use to medical experts such as doctors, and not to solons who are determined to use taxpayer dollars to fund their cowbell campaign issues.

  • Packman
    January 27, 2017 at 9:42 a.m.

    Thank you Asa and the Arkansas General Assembly. This law is good for society without violating the basic premise of Roe v Wade. It's high time decent people stood up to the abortionist bullies at Planned Parenthood and the ACLU.

  • NoUserName
    January 27, 2017 at 9:42 a.m.

    Given that there is another method for 2nd trimester abortions, please explain, Hawg, how this would have saved 638 lives?

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT