Today's Paper Latest stories Obits Weather Newsletters Traffic Puzzles/games
story.lead_photo.caption Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., leaves a meeting of Republican senators Tuesday, Sept. 19, 2017, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

WASHINGTON -- Arkansas' junior U.S. senator on Tuesday offered President Donald Trump a path to distance himself from the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran without immediately quitting it, imposing new sanctions or carrying out military action.

Tom Cotton, a Republican, said Trump should "decertify" Iran's compliance with the agreement in a report required by Congress every 90 days and next due on Oct. 15. That, Cotton said, would let Congress approve a list of demands that the president could then press European allies who are part of the accord -- and reluctant to leave it -- to accept.

"The Congress and president should lay out how the deal should change and the consequences for Iran," Cotton, a member of the Armed Services Committee, said Tuesday evening in Washington at an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations. "The world needs to know we are serious, we are willing to walk away, we are willing to impose sanctions and a lot more than that. And they'll know that when the president declines to certify the deal, and not before."

The 2-year-old accord lifted a range of international sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program. Cotton and other critics say it fails to take into account the threat posed by Iran's ballistic missile program and by its efforts in countries such as Syria, Iraq and Yemen to support leaders or groups opposed to the U.S. and its allies.

[EMAIL UPDATES: Get free breaking news alerts, daily newsletters with top headlines delivered to your inbox]

Trump campaigned against the agreement reached by his predecessor, Barack Obama, and has signaled increasing frustration after twice this year certifying Iran's compliance with the accord in earlier reports to Congress. He told the Wall Street Journal in July that he expected to find Iran not in compliance this month, and his aides have since sought to explain what the consequences of that could be.

Cotton stressed that decertifying Iran isn't necessarily the same as leaving the deal. He said that after Trump's decision, Congress would act to lay out key requirements of a revised Iran agreement.

"Their missile program alone warns us that they continue to seek nuclear weapons," Cotton said.

Citing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's comments about the accord, Cotton said the U.S. should "fix it or nix it."

Cotton said that while he'd be willing to give diplomacy time to work, economic sanctions and military action remain options.

"Calibrated strikes" against Iran are a possible option, Cotton said. If the Iranians "don't change their behavior they will not have a nuclear infrastructure. If we are forced to take action, the United States has the ability to totally destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure."

Cotton went on to say he thought the U.S. could "contain" any retaliatory behavior from Iran over nuclear strikes, such as the increased transfer of weapons to militant groups in the Middle East or activation of terrorist cells.

"Better to have no deal at all than one that compromises our security, emboldens Iran and encourages nuclear proliferation across the Middle East," Cotton said.

Information for this article was contributed by Tony Capaccio of Bloomberg News.

A Section on 10/04/2017

Print Headline: Cotton proposes Trump pitch Iran pact to Congress

Sponsor Content


You must be signed in to post comments
  • mrcharles
    October 4, 2017 at 9:28 a.m.

    heck fire mildred, we go those really big bombs , Why dont we use them..(1) those bombs might get out of date, (2) iran's religion is a false religion which is just thumbing its nose at our approved religion, (3) these people are going to hell anyway , so if the Elect wants to look down on them in hell lets get the ball rolling , (4) since TC mentioned it , it must be a good idea, (5) finally we get to decide even when we make treaties we can break them for cause [ cause we want to -- see USA and native american treaties] .

    Besides they are Persians, and Persians saved the nation of judah from the Babylonians , and since the jews did what st paul said, them Persians helped create the circumstances for the system of deity revelation that the jews had the wrong interpretation of their ancient books , even though they wrote them. Therefore it is the fault of the Persians that the jews did a very bad thing such as deocide [ uncle joe says how can you kill a deity- well you can is what I say]. for those of you who are ancient book illiterate even though you often spout the sound bites, talking about the jew who was in line of jewish apocalyptic ideas teaching those ideas to jews and did not want to throw any crumbs to the dogs whatsoever.

    And for you whishy washy types remember Our POTUS, yours and mine, says we are not so innocent.