Today's Paper Latest stories Most commented Drivetime Mahatma Traffic Weather Obits Newsletters Puzzles + Games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption President Donald Trump walks down the stairs of Air Force One during his arrival at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Fla., Thursday, April 19, 2018. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

NEW YORK — The Democratic Party sued Donald Trump's presidential campaign, Russia, WikiLeaks and Trump's son and son-in-law Friday, accusing them of an intricate conspiracy to undercut Democrats in the 2016 election by stealing tens of thousands of emails and documents.

The lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court seeks unspecified damages and an order to prevent further interference with computer systems of the Democratic National Committee.

"During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump's campaign," DNC Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement. He called it an "act of unprecedented treachery."

The Democrats accuse Trump and his associates of trading on pre-existing relationships with Russian oligarchs tied to President Vladimir Putin and of collaborating with Russia as it worked to undermine Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

The president has said repeatedly there was no collusion between his campaign and Russia. On Friday, his campaign scorned the lawsuit as "frivolous" and predicted it would be quickly dismissed.

"This is a sham lawsuit about a bogus Russian collusion claim filed by a desperate, dysfunctional and nearly insolvent Democratic Party," Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale said in a statement.

He said the campaign would seek to turn the tables on the Democrats, using the legal discovery process to try to pry documents from the DNC, including any related to a dossier detailing allegations of links between Trump and Russia. The dossier — a collection of memos — was written by an ex-British spy whose work was funded by Clinton and the DNC.

Requests for comment from the Russian Embassy in Washington were not immediately returned.

The Democrats' lawsuit doesn't reveal new details in the sprawling storyline of connections between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives working on behalf of the Kremlin. Instead, it knits many of the threads that have emerged in public over the past two years to paint a picture of an alleged conspiracy between the Trump campaign, the Kremlin and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

The DNC said the "brazen attack on American democracy" began with a cyberattack on DNC computers and phone systems in 2015, allowing the extraction of tens of thousands of documents and emails. WikiLeaks then blasted out many of the documents July 22, 2016, shortly before Clinton was to be nominated — upsetting the Democrats' national convention.

That added up to a "campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency," the DNC lawyers write in the lawsuit.

That conspiracy violated the laws of the U.S., Virginia and the District of Columbia, the lawsuit says, and "under the laws of this nation, Russia and its co-conspirators must answer for these actions."

The DNC accuses Donald Trump Jr. of secretly communicating with WikiLeaks and blames the president, too, saying he praised the illegal dissemination of DNC documents throughout fall 2016, making it a central theme of his speeches and rallies.

The DNC also fingers Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner as a co-conspirator for his role overseeing the Trump campaign's digital operation.

"DNC already has a moribund publicity lawsuit which the press has become bored of--hence the need to refile it as a 'new' suit before mid-terms," WikiLeaks said in a tweet. "As an accurate publisher of newsworthy information @WikiLeaks is constitutionally protected from such suits."

Assange, avoiding detention, remains in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London.

Special counsel Robert Mueller has filed charges against multiple former Trump campaign aides stemming from his federal Russia probe. But Mueller has directly accused only former Trump campaign foreign policy aide George Papadopoulos of trying to work with Russian operatives to support the Trump campaign.

Mueller also has indicted 13 Russian individuals working for the Internet Research Agency accused of running an elaborate scheme to meddle in the U.S. elections. The indictment alleges one of Putin's close allies, Yevgeny Prigozhin, oversaw the effort.

The hacking of the DNC has long been a sore spot for Democrats across the board since Clinton's loss in November 2016. The hack and subsequent release of the emails hit the party just before it formally nominated Clinton, and the emails remained a major issue through Election Day.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz lost her job as party chairwoman just hours before the nominating convention after emails were released showing the DNC appearing to favor Clinton over Bernie Sanders in the primaries. The emails formed a rallying cry for Sanders supporters hoping for a last-minute chance to deny the Clinton the nomination in Philadelphia.

Wasserman Schultz confronted then-FBI Director James Comey a few months later in January 2017 during a private briefing at the Capitol, accusing him of helping throw the election to Trump because of his handling of the Clinton email investigation. DNC staffers at the time accused the FBI of not doing enough immediately after the hack was discovered in 2015 to alert them to the problem.

Democrats have similarly been critical of President Barack Obama for not doing enough in 2016 to fight back against Russia. Obama expelled Russian diplomats and shuttered diplomatic compounds in December 2016.

This is the second time in recent history that the DNC has sued a Republican president.

The Democrats sued Richard Nixon's Committee to Re-elect the President in 1973 after the break-in at the DNC's Watergate Hotel headquarters.

Read Saturday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • mozarky2
    April 20, 2018 at 11:08 a.m.

    A pre-emptive strike ahead of the indictments-dims are scared Schiffless!

  • mozarky2
    April 20, 2018 at 11:27 a.m.

    This opens up discovery of everything the dims have on the dossier, the e-mails, the murder of Seth Rich; what moron at the DNC came up with this brilliant idea?
    I have no idea, but thank you, thank you, thank you!
    This is the suicide of an entire political party!

  • Delta123
    April 20, 2018 at 11:35 a.m.

    This lawsuit is pretty funny, I don't care who you are. It appears that the DNC is afraid that the so-called Russian collusion case is going nowhere fast and they feel the need to try and keep it in the news. A rather cheap political ploy if I ever saw one.

  • PopMom
    April 20, 2018 at 11:52 a.m.

    Actually, it is very smart. The DNC was damaged by the attack on its computer and should sue. It is a smart way to take control of the discovery and make sure that it moves forward. I'd love to see Trump cough up some bucks.

    Mozarky,

    It does not open up discovery of everything on the DNC emails. If there was an email about Seth Rich getting murdered, don't you think that Wikileaks would have dumped that one?

  • mozarky2
    April 20, 2018 at 11:58 a.m.

    Don't get out of that echo chamber much, do you, PM?
    Do you even know who Seth Rich is?

  • mozarky2
    April 20, 2018 at 12:02 p.m.

    Comey's book about an ongoing investigation in which he was the senior investigator and for which he could be a witness was astoundingly stupid.
    How'd he ever become head of the Federal Bureau of Matters?

  • Jfish
    April 20, 2018 at 12:35 p.m.

    So the whiney cheaters who made sure that Hillary was "nominated" over Bernie are filing a suit about some other possible cheaters? Makes sense to me. Will they ever learn? I know, I should not ask rhetorical questions.

  • LR1955
    April 20, 2018 at 12:36 p.m.

    echo chamber... good one Moz

  • Delta2
    April 20, 2018 at 12:41 p.m.

    I'm with Jfish, this is pathetic. Moves like this don't exactly endear the Democratic Party to the independent voter, and I am certainly no fan of Trump. Democrats need a long look in the mirror. The only possible albeit unlikely benefit from this would be the emergence of a viable third party.

  • RobertBolt
    April 20, 2018 at 1 p.m.

    I doubt the Democrats and their lawyers waited until six months before midterms to file this civil suit without first taking the time to give it ample consideration and planning. None of us commenting here have sufficient insight into their thinking or their plans to enable us to offer more than idle and wishfull speculations. That said, the interaction between this civil suit and the ongoing investigation by Mueller casts the Republican ship between Scylla and Charybdis, where sharp rocks to port drive the crew toward a starboard shipwreck. Unfortunately for the Republican crew, their captain is much closer to Crunch than to Odysseus.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT