Today's Paper Latest Elections Coronavirus 🔵 Covid Classroom Cooking Families Core values Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
story.lead_photo.caption U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., heads for a vote Thursday on Capitol Hill.

WASHINGTON -- Conservative leaders who are often allied with U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton blasted the Arkansas Republican on Thursday for attempting to derail bipartisan criminal-justice legislation.

At a Capitol Hill news conference, they urged him to support the First Step Act, which would shorten some federal criminal penalties and give judges greater leeway when sentencing certain offenders.

A Senate vote on the legislation, which addresses only federal offenses, is expected next week. President Donald Trump has urged lawmakers to pass the bill.

Doug Deason, a Texas philanthropist and major Republican donor, said he knows and respects Cotton, but is baffled by the senator's stance.

"We've talked about this, and he's just wrong. It's embarrassing that he's taken that position, and I'm afraid for him that he's going to suffer at the polls during his [2020] primary [Senate campaign] because this is going to be held against him," the Rogers native said.

David Safavian, general counsel for the American Conservative Union, said the White House deserves Cotton's support.

"He is a Trump ally, and he is undermining the president's agenda. And I'd like to understand why he is undermining the president's agenda," Safavian added.

The First Step Act's supporters have more credibility than its opponents, Safavian said.

"Donald Trump is for this bill. The Fraternal Order of Police are for this bill. The International Association of Chiefs of Police are for this bill. National District Attorneys Association are for this bill [and] 175 former federal prosecutors including ... two former [U.S. attorneys general] are for this bill," Safavian said. "It defies credibility to call this the leniency caucus."

Nearly 20 conservative leaders spoke at Thursday's news conference, including U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and representatives of Prison Fellowship, Americans for Prosperity and the Heritage Foundation.

Tim Head, executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, said the strategies have already been implemented in conservative states and have been effective.

The legislation is a mainstream conservative proposal, he said.

An earlier version of the bill sailed through the House, 360-59. Most of the opposition came from Democrats.

"Every Republican except for two in the House voted for this bill. ... Basically three-quarters of the Senate Republican caucus are in favor of this bill. We have a few people that still are waiting for the memo," he said.

Speakers Thursday, including Woodson Center founder Bob Woodson, rejected the "soft-on-crime" label.

"I have lost three members of my family to homicide. A 29-year-old brother; 17-year-old niece; 23-year-old nephew. And two others were violently assaulted and survived. So with that in mind, there's no way I'm lenient on crime. I'm law and order, but I'm also for effective law enforcement and effective punishment," said Woodson, a former American Enterprise Institute fellow and MacArthur Fellows "genius grant" recipient.

Cotton, who opposed the House version as well, has sharply criticized efforts to overhaul federal sentencing standards.

In an August Wall Street Journal editorial, Cotton labeled an earlier version of the First Step Act as a "jailbreak," warning that "the U.S. faces a drug epidemic today, exactly the wrong time to go soft on crime."

In an interview with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette last month, Cotton argued that the United States has an "under-incarceration problem" and labeled the First Step Act a "criminal leniency bill."

His office did not respond Thursday afternoon to the comments made at the news conference.

If the First Step Act is approved, people imprisoned under the three-strikes law would no longer face automatic life sentences; instead they would face 25 years in prison. Certain drug offenses that carry automatic 20-year sentences would now result in 15-year sentences.

It would also make retroactive a 2010 law that reduced the disparity between powder-cocaine and crack-cocaine-related convictions.

Before 2010, crack-cocaine possessors were dealt with more severely than those caught with powder cocaine.

In addition, the proposed legislation would expand supervised early-release programs for low-risk prisoners, enabling well-behaved inmates to get credit for enlisting in job-training programs, among other things, supporters say.

The 149-page draft piece of legislation exempts dozens of categories of crimes from early-release programs. It includes several that were added after Cotton objected to their omission from the list.

Prisoners would be housed within 500 miles of their hometowns.

The use of shackles to restrain pregnant women would generally be prohibited. The exceptions would be because there was no other means of stopping a woman who is a flight risk or who is determined to harm herself or others, or if it is necessary to protect her medical safety.

The legislation mandates screening, upon admission, for inmates with learning disabilities. It also requires de-escalation training to help corrections officers respond to inmates with mental illnesses or cognitive impairment.

As of Thursday, the federal inmate population stood at 180,789, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. That's a fraction of the 2.16 million people who were incarcerated on the local, state and national level as of Dec. 31, 2016, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

The federal prison system has grown rapidly over the past four decades. In 1980, it housed roughly 25,000 offenders.

Nearly half of all federal inmates -- 46 percent -- are locked up because of drug offenses. Eighteen percent were incarcerated after committing weapons, explosives or arson-related crimes. Roughly 10 percent are sex offenders, according to the latest bureau statistics.

The bill has been revised since Cotton began addressing concerns.

Next week, the Senate is scheduled to debate and vote upon three amendments that have been offered by Cotton and U.S. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La.

One would prevent federal inmates from participating in the early supervised release program if they've been convicted of any of nine crimes, including assaulting a law enforcement officer, hate crimes or assisting federal prisoners with jailbreaks. Dozens of other crimes are already listed.

Another would require prison wardens to notify victims "before an offender is transferred early into prerelease custody or supervised release."

The third amendment calls for the bureau to track rearrest data for prisoners who participate in the program.

In a written statement, Cotton said the First Step Act is evolving but that additional changes are needed.

"For months I've argued that the First Step Act did not go far enough in protecting victims and preventing serious felons from being eligible for early release. I'm glad the bill changed to address some of my concerns, and I hope my amendments can pass to ensure that no violent felons will be released early."

A Section on 12/14/2018

Print Headline: Puzzled, allies say of U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton's position on criminal-justice bill


Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • LRCrookAtty
    December 14, 2018 at 9:02 a.m.

    NOD...I looked this up and you are just blindly stupid. Stop reading Huff post and not following up on the actual bill and its purpose. This was meant to stop bad people from funneling money to family members to avoid the appearance of receiving money themselves. These were "sanctions" not criminal or even civil actions.

  • GeneralMac
    December 14, 2018 at 9:12 a.m.

    "you are just blindly stupid"

    I knew that ever since she first started posting here with her incoherent rants.

  • ELL998
    December 14, 2018 at 9:24 a.m.

    All of the above. This is a red state. Move to Chicago or New York City if don't like our policies. At least there you will agree with the liberal governments policies and your blood pressure will normalize. Get well.

  • Bocepheus
    December 14, 2018 at 9:27 a.m.

    At least 80% of all crimes are alcohol and/or other drug related. Only one (1) out of 10 of those addicted to alcohol or other drugs will get sober for a minimum of three straight years. Sobering facts on substance abuse which argue against early release.

  • GeneralMac
    December 14, 2018 at 9:43 a.m.

    Liberals want more gun control with stiff sentences for violation.

    Unless , of course, the gun law broken had to do with the drug sales.
    Then they want the gun violation dropped and a soft sentence based only on drugs.

  • Nodmcm
    December 14, 2018 at 9:44 a.m.

    Here's the story: "Rep. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on Wednesday introduced legislation that would "automatically" punish family members of people who violate U.S. sanctions against Iran, levying sentences of up to 20 years in prison.

    The provision was introduced as an amendment to the Nuclear Iran Prevention Act of 2013, which lays out strong penalties for people who violate human rights, engage in censorship, or commit other abuses associated with the Iranian government.

    Cotton also seeks to punish any family member of those people, "to include a spouse and any relative to the third degree," including, "parents, children, aunts, uncles, nephews nieces, grandparents, great grandparents, grandkids, great grandkids," Cotton said.

    "There would be no investigation," Cotton said during Wednesday's markup hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. "If the prime malefactor of the family is identified as on the list for sanctions, then everyone within their family would automatically come within the sanctions regime as well. It'd be very hard to demonstrate and investigate to conclusive proof.""

  • Nodmcm
    December 14, 2018 at 9:55 a.m.

    LRCrookAtty: In reply, 20 years in prison is not a mere 'sanction.' Yes, the purpose was to punish transfers of funds to family members, but no proof was required, according to Sen. Cotton himself, because it would be too hard to prove. Twenty years in prison is a criminal sanction, no doubt. You did not read up on Cotton's amendment. I know you do better work for your paying clients.
    ELL: Arkansas is still a two-party state. Alabama elected a Democratic senator. The South is not entirely lost to rabid conservatism. I have a feeling Texas might soon become baby blue, right on Arkansas' border. Then conservatives can consider moving to Utah or Wyoming. At least there, conservatives will agree with conservative government policies.
    GeneralMac: You act like a smart man. Read up on argument ad hominem, and realize the fallacy of fighting ideas with personal insults.

  • LRCrookAtty
    December 14, 2018 at 9:59 a.m.

    NOD..."...of people who violate U.S. sanctions against Iran..."
    The family must violate too, before any criminal charges. This is to stop funneling money to family members of those that violate.

  • GeneralMac
    December 14, 2018 at 10:04 a.m.

    NODMCM...Like an umpire , I call it like I see it.

    A few days ago another liberal female poster was saying teachers should call students in the classroom by whatever name the stude nt want to be called.

    When I asked what if the student want to be called by his thug street name ( "lil Boosi" "Bang Bang" "ZZ") she reinterated that teachers should call students by whatever nick name the student wants.

    INSANE !

  • GeneralMac
    December 14, 2018 at 10:07 a.m.

    How many of you cowards w ho criticize Ctoon's military service ever served in the military ?

    all hat, no cattle