Today's Paper Latest stories Obits Traffic Newsletters Weather Puzzles
story.lead_photo.caption FILE - In this Tuesday, Sept. 5, 2017, file photo, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., right, with Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., speak during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, to discuss their bipartisan Dream Act. A 12-year pathway to citizenship for young immigrants brought to the U.S. as children and who are here illegally is part of a bipartisan immigration proposal by senators to prevent deportation of hundreds of thousands of so-called Dreamers. The Associated Press on Saturday, Jan. 13, 2018 obtained details of the agreement between three Republican and three Democratic senators. The deal also calls for allocating $1.6 billion for structures including a wall for border security. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

WASHINGTON -- A bipartisan agreement among a handful of senators to prevent deportation of hundreds of thousands of young illegal aliens includes a pathway to citizenship that would take up to 12 years, plus $1.6 billion for structures that include a wall for border security, according to details obtained Saturday by The Associated Press.

President Donald Trump and some GOP congressional leaders have already said the bipartisan deal is insufficient. Its proponents -- led by Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. -- say they are continuing to round up supporters in hopes of building momentum for their plan.

The agreement between three Republican and three Democratic senators would prevent deportation of hundreds of thousands of so-called Dreamers, who were brought to this country as children and are in the U.S. illegally. The term "Dreamer" is based on the never-passed Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, which would have given protections similar to those provided by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, the initiative from President Barack Obama's time in office that Trump wants to terminate.

The senators had been working for months on how to balance those protections with Trump's demands for border security, an end to a visa lottery aimed at increasing immigrant diversity, and limits to immigrants' ability to sponsor family members to join them in America.

On Saturday, Trump sought to blame Democrats for the lack of an immigration deal.

"I don't believe the Democrats really want to see a deal on DACA. They are all talk and no action. This is the time but, day by day, they are blowing the one great opportunity they have. Too bad!" Trump tweeted as he arrived at his private golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla.

Political battle lines have intensified since Trump's vulgar description of African nations and derogatory comments about Haiti at a White House meeting Thursday, and the deal's fate is uncertain.

One of the six senators who crafted the deal, Democrat Michael Bennet of Colorado, said Saturday that the proposal "has everything the president asked for on the border." He said that if Trump can't support it, "it's difficult to see how we could get him to agree to anything that could pass in Congress."

It was unclear now how a deal might emerge, though both sides insist the clock is ticking.

A showdown is expected by Friday, the deadline for Congress to approve a spending bill to prevent a government shutdown the next day. Some Democrats are threatening to withhold needed votes for the budget measure unless there's an immigration accord.

The bipartisan Senate compromise includes a 12-year pathway to citizenship. That can be reduced by up to two years for time in the U.S. under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

There is also an additional $1.1 billion for surveillance technology and retaining and relocating Border Patrol agents. Other steps include body cameras, rescue beacons and more investigators for Border Patrol.

The deal also contains changes to a visa lottery program, which distributes up to 50,000 visas annually to people from countries that send few immigrants to the U.S.

Instead, half those visas would go to people from "priority countries" with low rates of immigration to the United States.

The other half of the visas would go to people currently receiving temporary protected status. Trump has curtailed that status for people from El Salvador, Haiti, Sudan and Nicaragua.

Late Saturday night, the federal government, citing a recent court order, said it has resumed the acceptance of requests for grants of deferred action under the DACA program.

Last week, a federal judge in California said the nearly 690,000 DACA recipients must retain their work permits and their protection from deportation while a lawsuit challenging the program's end moves forward.

On Saturday night, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said people previously granted deferred action under DACA may request renewal by filing the proper forms, but that it is not accepting new requests.

Information for this article was contributed by Jill Colvin and staff members of The Associated Press, and by Martin Weil and Clarence Williams of The Washington Post.

A Section on 01/14/2018

Print Headline: Proposal offers path to citizenship

Sponsor Content


You must be signed in to post comments
  • RBear
    January 14, 2018 at 5:47 a.m.

    Trump is really the one who doesn't want DACA, ignoring the reality of the matters related to the status of thousands of young people who are productive residents of this country. Most right wingers don't really grasp their situations and just blow this off with sweeping rhetoric rather than get to know the DACA recipients.
    Trump is actually negotiating from a position of weakness instead of power. The American public supports DACA and opposes the wall. They see this sensibly in that these young people should be granted deferred status while they resolve their citizenship WHILE residing in the US. That's a key point. Under a system without DACA, they would have to disrupt their lives and potentially leave families to return to violent countries and probably never return which is what most right wingers would prefer.
    With DACA, they have the opportunity to completing the process without fear of being deported. They retain their jobs, education, and family lives. They remain productive to our country. One I know of from San Antonio was admitted to MIT due to his academic excellence. He's a bright young man with a promising future ahead with research work that has already won him acclaim.
    With regards to the wall, it is unpopular and seen as a waste of money by most Americans. They have seen the results of border protection over the past several years and have seen the declines. Simple facts have proven that under Obama, more felon criminals were removed from the US than under any administration prior. The rate of illegal immigration was also reduced due to a number of factors. But those facts do not deter right wingers who seem to be so myopic in their thinking they ignore the facts. This is more about padding contractor pockets, much like defense spending, rather than true border protection.