Today's Paper Latest stories 2018 election city/county races Most commented Obits Traffic Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games

WASHINGTON -- Prospects for a bipartisan agreement to protect young immigrants from deportation and prevent a government shutdown later this week faded Sunday as key lawmakers traded sharp accusations and President Donald Trump said hopes for a deal were "probably dead."

Heading to dinner at his Palm Beach, Fla., golf club with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, Trump said that on immigration "we have a lot of sticking points but they are all Democrat sticking points," adding "they don't want security at the border."

Negotiators spent last week seeking a solution that would shield young illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children, including the roughly 800,000 who secured work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program created under President Barack Obama.

But a tentative deal worked out Thursday by a small bipartisan group of senators crumbled in an Oval Office meeting in which, according to multiple people involved, an angry Trump asked them why the United States should accept more immigrants from Haiti and "shithole" African nations over those from European countries such as Norway.

[PRESIDENT TRUMP: Timeline, appointments, executive orders + guide to actions in first 200 days]

Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and David Perdue, R-Ga. -- who attended the meeting and previously said they could not recall whether Trump had referred to "shithole countries" -- on Sunday denied outright that Trump had ever said it. That prompted Democrats to accuse them of impugning a fellow senator's credibility, a development that could further poison the bipartisan talks.

"Both sides now are destroying the setting in which anything meaningful can happen," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press.

Late Sunday, Trump denied making the statements attributed to him, but didn't get into specifics about what he did or did not say.

"Did you see what various senators in the room said about my comments?" he asked. "They weren't made."

Earlier Sunday, Trump declared immigration talks to be failing.

"DACA is probably dead because the Democrats don't really want it, they just want to talk and take desperately needed money away from our Military," he said on Twitter.

Democrats have tied the immigration talks to spending negotiations being held ahead of a Friday shutdown deadline. Republicans are seeking an increase in military spending; Democrats want a deferred-action program deal and a matching increase in nondefense funding.

The sole Democratic participant in the Oval Office meeting, Senate Minority Whip Richard Durbin of Illinois, told reporters Friday that Trump had used the vulgar word "not just once but repeatedly" during the meeting. A Republican attendee, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, issued a statement that did not specifically confirm the words used but backed up Durbin's account.

However, Perdue said in an interview Sunday on ABC's This Week that Trump did not use the word "shithole."

"I'm telling you he did not use that word, George," Perdue said, accusing Durbin of making a "gross misrepresentation" of what took place in the meeting: "It's not the first time Senator Durbin has done it, and it is not productive to solving the problem we're having."

Cotton said much the same in an interview with CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday: "I didn't hear it, and I was sitting no further away from Donald Trump than Dick Durbin was."

Cotton and Perdue had previously issued a joint statement saying that they did "not recall the President saying these comments specifically."

Both senators on Sunday pointed to a statement Durbin had made in 2013 about comments allegedly made by an unnamed GOP leader during a private White House meeting that were later denied by an Obama administration spokesman. "Senator Durbin has a history of misrepresenting what happens in White House meetings," Cotton said.

Ben Marter, a spokesman for Durbin, tweeted a rebuke early Sunday: "Credibility is something that's built by being consistently honest over time," he said. "Senator Durbin has it. Senator Perdue does not. Ask anyone who's dealt with both."

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., forcefully backed Durbin, who has written a bill to grant young illegal immigrants a path to citizenship and is the leading Democratic negotiator on the deferred-action program issue.

"To impugn [Durbin's] integrity is disgraceful," Schumer said. "Whether you agree with him on the issues or not, he is one of the most honorable members of the Senate."


The accounts of the meeting, however, have not fallen neatly along party lines.

Besides Graham's endorsement of Durbin's account, Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., said Sunday on This Week that he had spoken to participants in the meeting immediately afterward -- before The Washington Post publicly reported Trump's use of the vulgar term.

"They said those words were used before those words went public," Flake said.

Another participant, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, said in an interview with Fox News Sunday that she did not "recall him using that exact phrase," but she acknowledged he "did use and will continue to use strong language."

Host Chris Wallace told Nielsen it "seems implausible" that she would not recall that type of comment.

"I don't recall that specific phrase being used," she responded. "That's all I can say about that."

The comment has vexed Republicans, compelling many to make statements criticizing Trump for the remark. But it has infuriated Democrats who see the comment as evidence of malicious intent in Trump's policymaking.

"I think he is a racist," Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., said on This Week. "We have to stand out; we have to speak up and not try to sweep it under the rug."

Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., speaking Sunday on Meet the Press, said, "There's no question what he said was racist. There's no question what he said was un-American and completely unmoored from the facts."

Rep. Mia Love, R-Utah, the first black female Republican in Congress and the daughter of Haitian immigrants, also denounced Trump's comments as bigoted and called on him to apologize. "I think that would show real leadership," she said Sunday on CNN's State of the Union.

But Paul called those accusations unfair and, instead, accused the media of going "completely bonkers with just ad hominem [attacks] on the president," blaming the potential failure of the talks on the outcry over Trump's remarks.

"I do want to see an immigration compromise, and you can't have an immigration compromise if everybody out there is calling the president a racist," Paul told Meet the Press host Chuck Todd.

Trump addressed the issue briefly with reporters late Sunday.

Asked what he thinks about people who think he is prejudiced, Trump said, "No. No. I am not a racist." He told reporters: "I am the least racist person you have ever interviewed. That I can tell you."


While Democrats have expressed openness to a deal that would combine legal status for "Dreamers," as the group of young illegal immigrants brought as children are known, with funding for border security measures, Republicans have tried to broaden the talks. They have targeted the abolition of a special program allowing citizens of some countries to apply for visas distributed by lottery as well as rules allowing naturalized U.S. citizens to sponsor family members for legal status -- a system Republican critics refer to as "chain migration."

The tentative deal unveiled Thursday would give legal status and a pathway to citizenship for dreamers while also providing $2.7 billion for border security -- some of which could be used to construct the border wall Trump has proposed. The visas now offered under the lottery system would be reallocated to other immigration programs, such as one offering temporary status to citizens of nations in crisis -- like the ones Trump referred to in his Oval Office remarks.

Trump said in a second tweet Sunday that he wanted more aggressive measures in any deal: "I, as President, want people coming into our Country who are going to help us become strong and great again, people coming in through a system based on MERIT. No more Lotteries!"

Echoing dozens of Democrats, Lewis said he would not vote for any government spending measure until the dreamer issue is settled.

Republicans cannot pass a government funding bill without Democratic votes. There are 51 Senate Republicans in a chamber in which 60 votes are needed to pass major legislation, and GOP leaders are also facing problems in the House, where some Republican members have balked at the prospect of passing another stopgap that does not increase military funding.

"We must not give up or give in," Lewis said. "We must continue to press on and get a deal."

A federal judge in California last week halted Trump's decision to end the deferred-action program and ruled that participants in the program should retain their protected status. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said late Saturday that it would resume accepting renewal requests from people who had already enrolled in the program.

While Trump has criticized the judge's order on Twitter, his administration has not yet appealed the decision but is expected to do so. Immigration advocates urged beneficiaries of the program to seek renewals quickly.

"The Trump administration stated that it plans to 'vigorously' challenge the district court's decision. This means that the window of time available for sending in your DACA renewal is uncertain," the National Immigration Law Center said in a release over social media, urging those eligible "to apply immediately."

But there is little indication the ruling has helped to defuse the standoff, multiple Democratic aides involved in the effort to secure a compromise said Saturday. On Sunday, the situation's urgency had not changed. Democrats are focused on securing a legislative solution to the crisis ahead of the Friday deadline.

Flake, who helped negotiate the deal that Trump rejected, said he was still hopeful it could provide the basis for a broad agreement.

"I think that when we get back into town, people will realize there's only one deal in town," he said. "There's only one bipartisan bill, and we need 60 votes, and that bill will be presented with even more Republicans and Democrats than we have right now."

Information for this article was contributed by Mike DeBonis, Todd Frankel, Amy B. Wang and Anne Gearan of The Washington Post; by Ros Krasny, Shannon Pettypiece, Ben Brody and Chris Strohm of Bloomberg News; by Darlene Superville and Jonathan Lemire of The Associated Press; and by Sarah D. Wire of Tribune News Service.

A Section on 01/15/2018

Print Headline: Prospects dim for spending, DACA deals; Lawmakers trading insults in Trump quote aftermath

Sponsor Content


You must be signed in to post comments
  • RBear
    January 15, 2018 at 6:24 a.m.

    Trump torpedoed these discussions with several points including his caustic language regarding Africa and Haiti and his constant insistence on a wasteful wall that the majority of America is opposed to. Americans support DACA and while Trump may try to lay the blame on Democrats, they are just asking for a clean bill that meets the needs of those impacted.
    It's very simple and Trump needs to understand that. He may claim to be the expert at deal making, but his track record in 2017 has proven otherwise. The tax reform bill passed ONLY after offering all sorts of candy to some Republican senators, not on the merits of the bill.

  • hah406
    January 15, 2018 at 8:08 a.m.

    Cotton couldn't recall what the president said on Friday, but on Sunday he absolutely remembered that he didn't say it. What crap. Cotton is a moral and ethical coward who isn't fit for office. His position on immigration makes him seem nearly as xenophobic at Trump. The fact is that 80% of Americans support a DACA solution. Trump and Cotton knocked it down with that meeting in the oval office. The GOP is going to lose SO BIGLY in 2018.

  • 23cal
    January 15, 2018 at 8:24 a.m.

    Trump told Dreamers they had nothing to worry about and then ended DACA.
    He claims to support protecting them, but instead is using them as nothing but leverage for his unnecessary and inefficient wall.
    He rejected a bipartisan deal.
    Who cannot see that they are to him just "rapists and criminals" (his words for people from Mexico) who need to be sent back to their sh*thole country?
    About "they don't want security at the border." $30 billion dollars wasted on a foolish wall is not the same as "security at the border." Trump rejected a bipartisan deal to improve "security at the border."
    Regarding "Senator Durbin has a history of misrepresenting what happens in White House meetings," Cotton said." Trump is documented at between five and six lies on average Every. Single. Day. and Cotton is a bought and sold shill. The people who believe Trump didn't say sh*tholes are the same ones who believed he would release his tax returns and his inauguration crowd was the largest.
    About "But Paul called those accusations unfair and, instead, accused the media of going "completely bonkers with just ad hominem [attacks] on the president.." Ad hominem, eh? You mean they called him something like "sh*thole"?
    Regarding "I do want to see an immigration compromise, and you can't have an immigration compromise if everybody out there is calling the president a racist," Paul told Meet the Press host Chuck Todd." Let me fix that for you:
    "I do want to see an immigration compromise, and you can't have an immigration compromise i̶f̶ BECAUSE e̶v̶e̶r̶y̶b̶o̶d̶y̶ ̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶c̶a̶l̶l̶i̶n̶g̶ the president is a racist". There. Fixed.

  • GeneralMac
    January 15, 2018 at 9:35 a.m.

    I have yet to hear liberals idea on how to secure the border.
    Let every Mexican in and every 10 years grant amnesty?

  • GeneralMac
    January 15, 2018 at 9:37 a.m.

    You can't expect liberals to want any kind of border security when they favor protecting ILLEGALS with sanctuary cities.

  • AmpieMolina
    January 15, 2018 at 9:46 a.m.

    DACA is just like the TPS program (Temporary Protective Status) the goal for Democrats is permanent placement in the U.S. "Delayed" or "Temporary" are just BS terms used to mislead. These are programs used by Democrats to import as many refugees from the third world as they can then fight to keep them permanently. One day politicians may learn If you offer incentives, benefits people will come by the millions. So their answer is pass a "Dream act" legalize millions of illegal aliens (DACA.) But they don't want to separate families..... so add another 1-2 million. Same with the TPS program.

    Democrats, MSM, every faculty member at any university in the country fighting to the death for illegal aliens? they put a warm and fuzzy name on it "Dreamers."Democrats have actually changed the language. It's not illegal alien anymore its "Immigrant." They're not adults, they are "Kids" or "children." and no one seem to wonder why this obsession? future voters?

    JOBS-There is an estimated 800,000 DACA recipients in the US. That is 800,000 jobs American Citizens don't have or will be in competition for.The MSM and Democrats would have us believe that all 800 thousand DACA and TPS are not taking jobs Americans want (we've heard that lie for many years now.) There not all picking strawberries they take great Jobs. Good enough jobs to buy homes put their kids through college. So when you hear of the "contributions by illegal aliens paying taxes." Remember that also is at a cost in jobs citizens should have. Why must the citizens of our country have competition for jobs, education in their own country from foreign nationals? Now Democrats and illegal alien activists admit DACA recipients have great jobs,are buying homes, paying taxes.

    As for the Wall? Chuck and Nancy say it won't work. The Border Patrol says its mandatory if we want security. I'll go with the Border Patrol's advice.

    Some" of the costs associated with illegal immigration....Dollars and Blood.

    *The cost of educating illegal aliens children is staggering. From K-12 it costs taxpayers $122,000 for EACH illegal alien student. We've been paying this for decades

    *Now city, and state officials are appropriating millions of taxpayer dollars for legal fees to to file law suits and in defense of illegal aliens being deported.

    *2012 illegal aliens sent home $62 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. This is why Mexico is getting involved in our politics.

    *30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Does not include local jails and State Prisons. At $21,000 per year expense per inmate in Federal Prison---U do the math.

    *$3Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens, I repeat 3 MILLION a DAY to process Illegals in the Criminal justice system.

    *$2.2Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as SNAP (food stamps),WIC, & free school lunches.

  • drs01
    January 15, 2018 at 9:55 a.m.

    Understand this. The DACA is dead, and the government will be shut down because Trump used an undiplomatic term (sh**holes) to define certain parts of Africa and all of Haiti. He spoke the truth. I sit here in my neighborhood looking out my kitchen window at a real sh**hole across the street. They're everywhere, folks. Look around. You may not like his choice of words but the message is correct. We don't need immigrants from third world countries who come here to feed off our bloated welfare system.
    If you are offended by Trump's choice of words, you're a damned hypocrite.

  • RBear
    January 15, 2018 at 10:10 a.m.

    GM, once again false rhetoric doesn’t help your claim. Under Obama, more felon undocumented immigrants were removed PER YEAR than any presidency prior and under the current administration. Under Obama, the rate of illegals dropped significantly using existing protections. The wall has already been proven to be an inadequate deterrent but it gives Trump something to stand in front of to appease his issue illiterate demographic.
    With your flawed logic continually displayed is there any reason why I shouldn’t call you out for ignorance?

  • Lifelonglearner
    January 15, 2018 at 10:16 a.m.

    I give credit to $45 for finally actually prosecuting at least small businesses like 7-11 franchises who illegally hire illegal immigrants. By the same token, expanded punishment of illegal employers would be way more effective than our version of the Great Wall of China in reducing illegal immigration. It is the exploitation of those illegals who are willing to work for low wages in unsafe and miserable conditions that helps keep wages down, and things like fresh produce cheap. If weak border security is such a problem, why not immediately the military to lock down the borders and require ALL tourist and other visa holders to have a location chip so they can be deported if they overstay or commit a crime? Oh, and how much more in taxes are you willing to pay to build that wall? What program that benefits you, are you willing to give up?

  • Foghorn
    January 15, 2018 at 10:17 a.m.

    GenMac - The only way to prevent those from south of the border from coming here is to enact and enforce laws preventing US employers from hiring anyone undocumented. But crops will die in the field, food prices will soar. Consumers would riot and would never vote for anyone who would let it happen. We either pay public assistance to subsistence workers in exchange for cheap food, or we pay much higher food prices.