Today's Paper Latest stories Drivetime Mahatma Obits Weather Newsletters Puzzles/games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes heads to a GOP conference Tuesday at the Capitol.

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Paul Ryan on Tuesday defended the way that Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes handled a politically divisive vote to publicize a classified memo detailing alleged surveillance abuses by federal law enforcement agencies, but he warned against using it to discredit the special counsel's probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Ryan, R-Wis., said Nunes, R-Calif., was following a well-established process when the committee voted Monday to release a GOP-drafted memo to the public, provided President Donald Trump does not block its efforts within five days. The White House said Tuesday that it will conduct a legal and national security review before Trump makes his decision.

But on Tuesday night, Trump was overheard telling Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., that he favors letting the public see the memo.

"Don't worry," the president told Duncan on the House floor after delivering the State of the Union address. "100 percent."

[PRESIDENT TRUMP: Timeline, appointments, executive orders + guide to actions in first 200 days]

Duncan had implored Trump to "release the memo."

Also Tuesday, the Intelligence Committee voted along party lines to make a Democrat-drafted memo rebutting the GOP's document available to House members to read in a secure facility, as the panel had done with the GOP memo 11 days earlier.

Ryan suggested to reporters that "there may have been malfeasance at the FBI by certain individuals," citing that as one of several reasons Republicans want "all of this information" contained in the memo "to come out."

But he stressed that "the chairman went to the FBI to make sure we were protecting sources and methods," calling it "ironic" that Democrats were complaining, as "Devin actually made the motion" Monday to make the Democrats' memo available to other House members.

Democrats have claimed that Nunes withheld the memo from the FBI and the Justice Department until the last minute, resisting the advice of top officials who were warning against making it public.

The Washington Post reported Tuesday evening that late Monday, Justice Department officials made a last-ditch plea to White House Chief of Staff John Kelly about the dangers of publicly releasing a memo alleging abuses by the FBI.

Shortly before the House Intelligence Committee voted to make the document public, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein warned Kelly that the four-page memo prepared by House Republicans could jeopardize classified information and implored the president to reconsider his support for making it public, according to people briefed on the meeting.

Rosenstein was joined in the meeting at the White House by FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Rosenstein, who is supervising special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's interference in the election, said the Department of Justice was not convinced the memo accurately describes its investigative practices. He said making the document public could set a dangerous precedent, according to a person familiar with the discussion.

While Wray also expressed opposition to the memo's release, Rosenstein did much of the talking, according to a senior U.S. government official. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not present at the meeting.

In response, Kelly told Rosenstein and Wray that the president was inclined to release the memo but the White House would go through a review led by the National Security Council and the White House counsel's office, a senior administration official said. That review is expected to take at least several days, a senior White House official said. The Associated Press also reported the White House's plans for a review.

Asked Tuesday about the department's position on the memo's release, Justice Department spokesman Sarah Isgur Flores declined to comment.

Wray has had the opportunity to review the memo, though it has not been vetted by the FBI's in-house lawyers, according to people familiar with the matter.

On Tuesday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders pushed back on reports that the release was imminent, saying the White House had no "current plans" to do so.

"The President has not seen or been briefed on the memo or reviewed its contents," she said in a statement.

The memo deals primarily with the role that intelligence passed along by British ex-spy Christopher Steele played in the FBI's efforts to conduct surveillance on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser, according to people familiar with the four-page document.

Steele's work, which was partially funded by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee, led to a dossier of allegations of ties between Trump and the Kremlin. Trump has denied the allegations, and Republicans have suggested that Steele provided bad information to the FBI -- though people familiar with the memo say it does not conclusively say whether Steele intentionally passed along suspect information.

'SEPARATE MATTER'

Several Republicans and conservative pundits have seized on the memo as a reason to question the underpinnings and legitimacy of Mueller's ongoing probe of alleged connections between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. But on Tuesday, Ryan firmly warned people against drawing such links.

"This is a completely separate matter from Bob Mueller's investigation, and his investigation should be allowed to continue," Ryan said, adding that the "institution" of the FBI and Justice Department is "very important for American life."

Revelations last week that Trump sought to order Mueller's firing in June have raised new concerns that the president may try to oust the special counsel or Rosenstein, who oversees the investigation. Democrats have been clamoring since to pass legislation to protect Mueller, by giving a panel of three federal judges the power to review any presidential order to fire a special counsel.

Republican leaders have rejected Democrats' concerns, as well as their calls for legislative steps to protect Mueller.

"My understanding is there's no effort underway to undermine or to remove the special counsel. Therefore, I don't see any need to bring up legislation to protect someone who appears to need no protection," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Tuesday.

Ryan said that calls for Rosenstein to step down also were misplaced.

"I think Rod Rosenstein's doing a fine job. I have no reason to see why he should do that," Ryan said, noting that Rosenstein "came in after this last election."

Democrats, however, say the GOP's memo campaign is compromising the integrity of key law enforcement agencies in political deference to Trump, at a time when they need to be especially vigilant against potential threats from Russia.

Senior Democrats openly questioned why Republicans chose to focus their attention on the memo Monday instead of Trump's decision not to sanction Russian officials on the administration's newly released oligarchs list, which mirrors a list Forbes magazine compiled of the wealthiest Russians.

"These are mandatory sanctions," Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said. "He is ignoring them and he is not implementing them ... making things worse."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has rejected Democrats' argument that releasing the memo will compromise the country's law enforcement agencies or otherwise undermine the special counsel's Russia probe. He has expressed support for the House GOP's campaign to release the memo, and is working himself to determine which underlying documents -- which were also provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee -- ought to be declassified.

In the House, lawmakers were waiting for the president to decide whether the memo will be released to the public. In the meantime, members have been instructed to stay mum about its contents, according to Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., chairman of the House Freedom Caucus.

"We need to make sure we don't share anything," Meadows recalled leaders saying during a GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning.

3-WEEK LAG NOTED

In another development, people familiar with the matter said the Justice Department's inspector general has been focused for months on why Andrew McCabe, as the No. 2 official at the FBI, appeared not to act for about three weeks on a request to examine a batch of Clinton-related emails found in the latter stages of the 2016 election campaign.

The inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the examination of emails found on the laptop of former Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., until late October -- about three weeks after first being alerted to the emails, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

A key question of the internal investigation is whether McCabe or anyone else at the FBI wanted to avoid taking action on the laptop findings until after the Nov. 8 election, these people said. It is unclear whether the inspector general has reached any conclusions on that point.

A major line of inquiry for the inspector general has been trying to determine who at the FBI and the Justice Department knew about the Clinton emails on the Weiner laptop and when they learned about them. McCabe is a central figure in those inquiries, these people said.

The FBI declined to comment, as did a spokesman for the inspector general. An attorney for McCabe did not respond to a request for comment.

On Monday, McCabe left the FBI, after a meeting with Wray in which they discussed the inspector general's investigation, according to people familiar with the matter. Horowitz announced in January 2017 that he was examining the Justice Department's handling of the Clinton investigation. His report is expected in the spring.

The matter of the Weiner laptop emails has been debated publicly for more than a year, in part because many Clinton supporters say the FBI tilted the 2016 race toward Trump when it announced in late October that it was reopening its probe into Clinton's use of a private email server when she served as secretary of state.

Key parts of what went into that decision have remained murky and are a major focus of the inspector general's probe, according to people familiar with the matter.

Separately on Tuesday, the House Intelligence Committee's interview with former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon was delayed, according to two people familiar with the decision. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private committee deliberations.

Bannon was set to be interviewed privately today. But one of the people familiar with the decision to delay it said it was premature to schedule it this week because discussions with the White House over what Bannon can tell the committee have only just started.

The committee subpoenaed Bannon earlier this month after he refused to answer questions about his time in the Trump administration at the direction of the White House counsel's office.

Rep. Mike Conaway, the Texas Republican leading the House investigation of Russian interference, said that Bannon's subpoena, which is set to expire today, can easily be extended.

Information for this article was contributed by Karoun Demirjian, Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey, Sean Sullivan and Erica Werner of The Washington Post and by Chad Day, Zeke Miller, Eric Tucker, Jonathan Lemire, Tom LoBianco, Mary Clare Jalonick and Andy Taylor of The Associated Press.

A Section on 01/31/2018

Print Headline: Ryan defends handling of GOP memo as proper

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • 23cal
    January 31, 2018 at 6:26 a.m.

    "The President has not seen or been briefed on the memo or reviewed its contents," she said in a statement."
    *
    Seems odd that he has been calling for the release of something he knows nothing about. Makes one wonder why he isn't also calling for the release of the Democrat rebuttal so Americans can read both and make a decision based on all available information.
    *
    Anyone who thinks Nunes didn't virtually trot his memo over there and read it to Trump hasn't been paying attention.
    *
    Just the usual stream of lies coming out of the White House. Must be a day ending in "y".

  • RobertBolt
    January 31, 2018 at 7:48 a.m.

    This will ultimately prove to be merely one more discredited attempt to undercut the legitimate investigation into Agent Orange's malfeasance. After yet another exaggerated kerfluffle, President Putin Puppet will resume his forced march toward perjury, pleading the Fifth Amendment, or firing Mueller enroute to impeachment in 2019.

  • hah406
    January 31, 2018 at 8:48 a.m.

    Ryan knows better. There is nothing proper about this. It is unprecedented. Nunes is a partisan hack, and this memo was drafted by his staff alone. If this is about transparency then you have to release the democrat's letter at the exact same time and let the public decide. Of course, none of this will matter in 2019 when the Muller report drops and congress makes a decision on impeachment with the Dems in charge.

  • TimberTopper
    January 31, 2018 at 8:56 a.m.

    There's not much to Ryan, and even less on this Nunes guy!

  • Packman
    January 31, 2018 at 9:38 a.m.

    Republicans don't need to be spiking the ball just yet. The memo was written by partisan hacks and must be property vetted before any conclusions are drawn. That being said, if the memo is factual let the chips fall where they may. If the memo indicates officials at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI attempted to influence the outcome of a presidential election an investigation MUST be ordered.
    .
    This isn't about partisan politics. It's about right and wrong and possible corruption within some of our most respected governmental institutions. Those making it about partisan politics (23cal, Boltar, hah, and Timber) care more about being butthurt that Hillary lost than what's best for America.

  • PopMom
    January 31, 2018 at 10:12 a.m.

    Boltar and Hah nailed it. My concern is that there is some info. in the memo which will endanger some of our spies. If it does, it won't take Putin long to kill them.

  • Dontsufferfools
    January 31, 2018 at 10:27 a.m.

    One can hardly fault the Obama administration for worrying about whether Russia had compromised Trump or members of his inner circle, given the information U.S. intelligence operations was bringing to them. The Flynn-Kushner attempt to open a communications channel to the Kremlin VIA THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY is hair-raising. Meanwhile, Kremlin-connected people like Manafort, Ross and Tillerson come out of nowhere to get positions around Trump; Carter Page, Flynn and Papadopoulus lie to the FBI about their doings with the Russians; all the while Trump is rubbing up against Putin like a hungry kitten and being very secretive about his business financing. I doubt the Nunes memo will note it, but the the most alarming information about the Trump team's Russia links came from allied countries in Europe. If the Steele dossier was used it was only to augment the case for surveillance. Some in the GOP have dug in too deep around Trump. I assume that, short of a confession, they'll continue to rationalize and explain away all of the loaves of bread leading from Trump Tower to the Kremlin. This is an email that Felix Sater, a Trump business associate who was born in Russia and has connections there, sent to Trump lawyer Michael Cohen in 2015: “Our boy can become president of the USA and we can engineer it,” wrote Sater. “I will get all of [Vladimir] Putins [sic] team to buy in on this, I will manage this process.… I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected.”

  • RobertBolt
    January 31, 2018 at 11:10 a.m.

    Thoughtful comments all. I'm impressed at the absence of the usual trollery. Maybe our refusal to engage is having a positive impact.

  • Packman
    January 31, 2018 at 11:55 a.m.

    Hey Pop - Bullsh*t! Your concern is the Mueller investigation will totally exonerate President Trump over allegations of both Russian collusion and obstruction of justice and instead the evidence will lead to treason by BH Obama as he attempted to influence the outcome of a presidential election. THAT, Pop, is what keeps you up at night.
    .
    Cannot imagine the anger the judge(s) that approved those FISA warrants will feel when it is concluded the Steele memo was chock full of Russia propaganda provided by the Hillary Clinton campaign with an assist from BH Obama and his minions at DOJ and the FBI. The FISA court is where the sh*t will really hit the fan. And it cannot happen soon enough.

  • DoubleBlind
    January 31, 2018 at 1:06 p.m.

    The drama surrounding this ‘memo’ is laughable. If there were anything remotely meaty in it, it would already be out there. I’m guessing it will end up reading like one of those ransom notes made by cutting words from a newspaper and sticking them on a piece of paper. I also think it’s rich that Kelly said ‘Trump wants everything out there so the American people can make up their own minds.’ If that’s the case, where are the tax returns?

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT