Today's Paper Latest stories 2018 election city/county races Most commented Obits Traffic Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Medication-induced abortion remains available in Arkansas under a ruling issued Monday evening by a federal judge who said she has reviewed several more years of data and several new U.S. Supreme Court rulings since she first blocked the state from enforcing a 2015 law restricting the practice.

The law, Act 577 of 2015, also known as the Abortion-Inducing Drugs Safety Act, requires doctors who perform pill-induced abortions to first secure a contract with a second obstetrician/gynecologist who has hospital admitting privileges and agrees to treat the patient if complications arise.

It's a requirement that Planned Parenthood, which provides medication abortions at its clinics in Little Rock and Fayetteville, and Little Rock Family Planning Services, which provides medication and surgical abortions, say is impossible for them to meet because of the stigma doctors face if they associate with abortion doctors and the potential harassing or even violent consequences. Neither clinic was aware of any private physicians in Arkansas who perform abortions.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker first issued a preliminary injunction in May 2016 that prevented the state from enforcing the new law, which legislators touted as a means of protecting women and ensuring continuity of care after the two-step procedure that involved one pill administered by a doctor and a second taken at home. The procedure is available only through a woman's ninth week of pregnancy.

[DOCUMENT: Read U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker's ruling]

But a doctor and a nurse practitioner who have provided abortions for years testified last week that the requirement is unnecessary because the increasingly popular nonsurgical procedure is safe and they have never had to admit a medication-abortion patient to a hospital. The law is seen by abortion supporters as a way to prevent Planned Parenthood from providing abortions, making it harder for all women in Arkansas to obtain them.

Baker's first injunction was dissolved last July 28 by a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis. An opinion written by Judge Raymond Gruender of St. Louis, who has been named as one of President Trump's many potential nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court after the recent retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, remanded the case to Baker to flesh out her ruling. Specifically, the 8th Circuit instructed Baker to determine whether a "large fraction" of Arkansas women seeking medication abortions would by unduly burdened by the law.

The 8th Circuit's order was put on pause, however, while Planned Parenthood appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which on May 29 declined to hear the case, allowing the 8th Circuit ruling to stand.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court has made other rulings, particularly in a Texas case known as Hellerstedt, declaring that a contracted-physician requirement in Texas places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman's choice for a large fraction of women seeking medication abortions.

Baker relied on the Hellerstedt case, the high court's resolution of other factual disputes and updated statistics from both sides of the lawsuit to issue a 14-day temporary restraining order that was set to expire at 5 p.m. Monday. Her latest ruling, which came in the form of a 148-page written order, was filed about 5:30 p.m. Monday, extending the temporary order. It will remain in effect until a trial on the law's constitutionality is held and the judge decides whether to make the injunction permanent. Baker has already determined that Planned Parenthood is likely to prevail.

Reaction was swift.

"Attorney General [Leslie] Rutledge is extremely disappointed in Judge Baker's decision .... allowing Planned Parenthood and Little Rock Family Planning Clinic to provide medication abortions without protecting the health of pregnant women," Rutledge's spokesman, Jessica Ray, said Monday evening.

She added, "Under this preliminary injunction, medication abortion providers can now administer these procedures without the necessary safety net available to women who experience emergencies and complications. Last year, the 8th Circuit unanimously ruled that Judge Baker's original attempt to block this law was incorrect. Today's order is completely inconsistent with the 8th Circuit's decision and Attorney General Rutledge will appeal to the 8th Circuit and do everything in her power to protect the lives of Arkansas women."

Bettina Browstein of Little Rock, one of the attorneys for Planned Parenthood, responded by saying, "Attorney General Rutledge -- that fine legal scholar -- has obviously not read this opinion," and also has apparently not read the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Hellerstedt finding that a contracted-physician requirement provides no added benefit for women, while creating an undue burden on their right to obtain an abortion.

Brownstein said she was "extremely pleased" with Baker's order, noting, "I didn't think she could possibly be more rigorous and detailed than she was in her TRO. This is quite an impressive order, a thorough piece of work."

The 148-page preliminary injunction order includes much of the reasoning from the 100-page temporary restraining order issued June 18 but includes additional information that was provided since then through legal briefs, documents and testimony at a hearing last week.

"Let's be honest," Brownstein said. "The attorney general wants to shut down abortion clinics. ... Let's not insult women and say this is about their health. She is using the subterfuge of saying this law is to help women's health." In fact, Brownstein said, "they provide fabulous abortion care at both" Planned Parenthood and Little Rock Family Planning Services.

Baker has noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared that medication abortion is a "remarkably safe" procedure.

In addition to citing the high court's clarification of several legal issues since her first injunction on March 14, 2016, Baker noted that also in that time, "many more district courts have examined these issues and permitted parties to develop factual and legal arguments related to similar disputes in other states."

Baker said that Planned Parenthood -- the only provider that is a plaintiff in the lawsuit -- has provided medication abortions in Arkansas since 2008. She recited ways in which abortions in Arkansas are already "heavily regulated," including that only physicians who are currently licensed to practice in Arkansas may perform abortions, and that each abortion patient shall have access to 24-hour telephone consultation with either a registered nurse or a physician associated with the abortion facility. Counseling must be provided to each patient before an abortion, and each patient is to be assessed for post-abortion counseling.

She cited the fact that abortion patients can only be released upon a physician's orders, that detailed written instructions are provided to abortion patients when they leave the clinic, along with emergency contact numbers, and that the patients' medical records must be maintained and stored.

Each abortion facility must have written procedures for an emergency transfer of a patient to an acute care facility, and must have available equipment for handling an emergency. The Arkansas Department of Health may revoke a facility's license for any practices detrimental to a patient's health.

In 2017, Planned Parenthood physicians provided 843 medication abortions, 653 of which were performed at its Fayetteville health center. Little Rock Family Planning provided 92 medication abortions and 2,334 surgical abortions during the same period.

In her latest order, Baker cited evidence that the "vast majority" of hospitals don't provide abortions and don't provide hospital privileges to doctors who provide abortions.

She reviewed Planned Parenthood's numerous efforts to try to recruit a contracting physician and again noted that if the Fayetteville clinic stops performing abortions, women in the Fayetteville area would be required to travel 380 miles to make one trip to Little Rock to access surgical abortion services. Another Arkansas law known as the informed consent provision requires that women visit the clinic at least 48 hours in advance of the procedure, requiring two trips.

"For now, this Court finds ... that Section 1504(d) causes ongoing and imminent irreparable harm to the plaintiffs and their patients," Baker said. She said that information developed so far indicates that the section "will force [Planned Parenthood's] two abortion clinics to cease providing medication abortions, the only type of abortion offered by those two clinics, leaving Arkansas with only one abortion clinic, which is located in Little Rock and provides only surgical abortions. Those women who live in Northwest Arkansas and seek a medication abortion are now faced with the prospect of making two 380-mile round trips to Little Rock for a surgical abortion."

Even considering abortion providers in surrounding states, Baker said, "it is not a short distance to an alternative provider for most women seeking a medication abortion in Arkansas ... Since the record at this stage of the proceedings indicates that Arkansas women seeking medication abortions face an imminent threat to their constitutional rights, the Court concludes they will suffer irreparable harm without preliminary relief."

Metro on 07/03/2018

Print Headline: Ban on abortion via pill blocked; law halted until trial, judge rules

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • WGT
    July 3, 2018 at 6:25 a.m.

    Hoo boy! The sooner we vote out “that fine legal scholar” and replace the misguided elected official, women needing health care in the state will be safer. That’s how it’s going to work around here!

  • RBear
    July 3, 2018 at 7:25 a.m.

    Regardless what people may think, Roe v. Wade is still in effect and will remain in effect through this ruling. Rutledge and her team are trying falsely portray this as a critical requirement. However, facts show this form of abortion is even more safe than the type considered in the TX case where the requirement was considered an unnecessary burden for women in Hellerstedt.
    ...
    Putting that aside, if the state REALLY wanted to win this case they would have brought in someone who knew stats better than the idiot they hired. The guy couldn't even get his OWN facts straight. This has been a cluster from the start by the AG's office.

  • Popsmith
    July 3, 2018 at 8:08 a.m.

    Whooeeee! Now we got a few days to jump in and murder them babies.

  • TimberTopper
    July 3, 2018 at 8:18 a.m.

    Pop, do yourself a favor and spend some time at Children's Hospital, so you can see what happens to un-wanted and un-loved children that are born to parents that don't need to be parents. You must be one of those people that would starve a dog to death rather than put it out of it's misery.

  • merlin749
    July 3, 2018 at 8:29 a.m.

    Planned Parenthood and Alan Guttmacher are rich, rich, off the misery of women. They don't care about women's health, it's all about the money. They can hire all kinds of lawyers and file court documents forever with that money.

  • jonathonjackson
    July 3, 2018 at 8:32 a.m.

    The logic from the abortionite's like Timberkiller is flawed. The child isn't wanted so lets kill it? That my friend is pure evil= it is murder, life begins at conception and YOUR argument is- yes they would be born, but since no one wants them, lets KILL them'

    "end of passion play, crumbling away
    I'm your source of self-destruction
    Veins that pump with fear
    Sucking darkest clear
    Leading on your death's construction "

    The logic of the left isn't. One decry that "it is currently the law" , so was the murder of 6 million Jews. At one time THAT was the law, simpleton.

    Bottom line, you either love Jesus or follow Satan. Jesus is love, and hates abortion, to claim abortion as "health care" is really moronic.

    Abortion is EVIL.

  • GeneralMac
    July 3, 2018 at 8:53 a.m.

    Another abortion decision and the name "Planned Parenthood" appears...........10.....times.

    Why is that abortion mill still being federally funded ?

  • GeneralMac
    July 3, 2018 at 8:55 a.m.

    TreeTrimmer compares humans to dogs.

  • jonathonjackson
    July 3, 2018 at 9 a.m.

    I didn't read all of Timberslasher's wisdom. He equated an unborn black baby with a starving dog? I think that is racism. He may have wanted to just limit it to unborn Mexican babies or native American babies, like me, I am a native of America=Native American-by definition. Either way to compare a beautiful new born to a starving dog is Evil. The left is mentally inept. Liberalism is a mental disease. The tenants of liberalism is BIG Government is the answer, and that is 100% wrong, it is the Problem to all of our biggest issues nation wide- the bailouts=socialism, welfare=socialism, failed health care=socialism,
    the left is NEVER right, all these carpet baggers from the north, like Rudd Duvall, he is an avowed socialist and is anti Jesus and anti freedom, and the rest of the leftist loons, Al Case et al. Rbear is wrong always too.

  • RBear
    July 3, 2018 at 9:09 a.m.

    ROTFL @ at jj’s rambling nonsense. Actually, more fact in my comment than in your bizarre rant.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT