Today's Paper Latest stories Obits Newsletters Weather Puzzles/games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., left, and Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the panel chairman, are shown on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 9, 2018.

WASHINGTON -- The Senate Intelligence Committee backed the finding by U.S. intelligence agencies that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a campaign to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, ultimately intending to help Donald Trump win.

"The committee concurs with intelligence and open-source assessments that this influence campaign was approved by President Putin," the panel said Tuesday in a report that endorsed as "sound" the intelligence findings issued in January 2017.

"The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions," said a statement from Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the panel's chairman.

Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said the panel thoroughly reviewed all aspects of the intelligence agencies' work leading up to its assessment.

"The Russian effort was extensive and sophisticated, and its goals were to undermine public faith in the democratic process, to hurt Secretary [Hillary] Clinton and to help Donald Trump," Warner said.

The January 2017 intelligence assessment said Russian activities in the run-up to the presidential election represented a "significant escalation" in a long history of Russian attempts to interfere in U.S. domestic politics, the committee said.

The intelligence agencies found that Russians had engaged in cyber-espionage and distributed messages through Russian-controlled propaganda outlets to undermine public faith in the democratic process, "denigrate" Clinton and develop a "clear preference" for Trump.

The committee said it perused thousands of pages of documents and conducted interviews with relevant parties that helped the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency compile its review about Russian meddling.

Officials relied on "public Russian leadership commentary, Russian state media reports, public examples of where Russian interests would have aligned with candidates' policy statements, and a body of intelligence reporting," the Senate report said.

The committee's statement is not a surprise -- Burr and Warner have both made previous statements supporting the intelligence community's assessment. But the strong endorsement nonetheless marks a significant milestone in the continued debate over Russia's role in the 2016 campaign.

The report puts the panel at odds with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, who issued their own report this year, and the president, who has continued to question the intelligence agencies' assessment.

"Russia continues to say they had nothing to do with Meddling in our Election!" Trump tweeted on June 28, then questioned whether law enforcement had adequately investigated the issue. "So many questions, so much corruption!"

The Senate committee's bipartisan conclusion comes as Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin on July 16 in Helsinki, Finland.

Putin last week met with Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, and told him that there had been no interference "by the Russian state," Bolton said in a Fox News interview over the weekend.

The Senate committee, however, said the scope of Russian interference has only become clearer in the years since the campaign.

"Further details have come to light that bolster the assessment," the report said.

The Senate report diverges from the one released in March by House Intelligence Committee Republicans, who said officials were mistaken to conclude that Moscow wanted Trump to win. The House Republicans' report also emphasized the lack of public evidence that Trump's allies conspired with Russians, something that remains under investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller.

Democrats on the House panel sharply disagreed, saying the Republican-controlled panel had not interviewed enough witnesses nor gathered enough evidence to make a definitive assessment.

House Republicans have contended that the Russia investigation went awry well before Mueller's appointment because it depended on an anti-Trump dossier gathered by former British spy Christopher Steele and financed by Democrats and Clinton's campaign.

But the Senate report said the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference didn't rely on the dossier because it contained unverified information.

"All individuals the committee interviewed verified that the dossier did not in any way inform the analysis," the panel said.

The Senate Intelligence panel has continued its investigation of whether anyone on the Trump campaign colluded with Russia's efforts. Burr has said he hopes to wrap up interviews this month and begin drafting a final report in August.

The Senate report also said there were no signs that President Barack Obama's administration improperly tried to interfere with intelligence agencies' analysis.

"The Committee heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions," the report said.

The report is the latest example of how the Senate Intelligence Committee has diverged from its House counterpart.

The House Intelligence Committee has been split along partisan lines, releasing Republican and Democratic versions of various reports.

The House panel's chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has dedicated significant time to examining how the Justice Department has handled the Russian probe.

Meanwhile, the Senate committee has maintained bipartisan cooperation and expressed little interest in Nunes' theories about allegations of investigator misconduct.

Information for this article was contributed by Chris Megerian of the Los Angeles Times; by Deb Riechmann of The Associated Press; and by Steven T. Dennis and Billy House of Bloomberg News.

Photo by AP file photo
This Oct. 24, 2017, file photo shows Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., speaking on Capitol Hill in Washington.

A Section on 07/04/2018

Print Headline: Senate panel: Putin ordered '16 meddling

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • TimberTopper
    July 4, 2018 at 5:53 a.m.

    So the Trump voters voted for the Russian/Republican candidate. Surely now they don't think of themselves a good Americans!

  • 23cal
    July 4, 2018 at 6:56 a.m.

    "The report puts the panel at odds with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee...." The House Republicans on that committee are spineless shills trying to cover this up like a bunch of cats in a litter box trying to cover their stench. They have put party over country in order to pander to those gullible and in denial over the Russian candidate.
    *
    "Russia continues to say they had nothing to do with Meddling in our Election!" Trump tweeted" Count on the Russian puppet to try to ignore the conclusions of our 17 intelligence agencies, the intelligence agencies of our allies, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and still be either stupid or venal enough to believe or pretend to believe his controller. The sad part is that so many Americans, many of whom make the welkin ring with their "patriotic" screams of outrage over black football players taking a knee, are going to go along with this sham.
    *
    Trump says "So many questions, so much corruption!" Any thinking person would have to agree with his projection here.
    *
    "But the Senate report said the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference didn't rely on the dossier because it contained unverified information." The House used the dossier as a red herring and a straw man, one which the Trump cultists devoured with single-minded blindness.
    *
    Can't wait for the usual Russian bots to come on here today to bluster for their Russian candidate. They, and the House Republicans, have sold their souls to Russia for political power here.

  • RBear
    July 4, 2018 at 7:29 a.m.

    All indicators are that Russia did meddle in the 2016 with a bent towards favoring Trump. Granted, the Clinton campaign and the DNC were sloppy in how they dealt with online assets and should have had a better team in place. Regardless, the fact that a foreign government, albeit a hostile one to several American ideologies, meddled in the election should trouble our Congress AND our president to the point of taking steps to prevent it.
    ...
    Instead, we get much of the same sloppy behavior by the Trump administration and feckless representatives who are more concerned about being invited to the cool kids parties than serving their constituents. Sen. Cotton is one of the worst, continuing to attempt to build his resume in hopes of either a cabinet position or preparing for his own presidential bid in 2024. Secretly, I bet he's hoping for a Trump impeachment so he has a shot at the cool houses in DC, either the WH or the Naval Observatory.
    ...
    Russia continues to meddle, including recent social media campaigns targeting mass shooting reactions or other national issues. These are just keeping the lines warm and the hackers trained in the run-up to the 2018 mid-terms.

  • hurricane46
    July 4, 2018 at 10:04 a.m.

    Wow, I’m shocked, no, not really.

  • itryed
    July 4, 2018 at 10:09 a.m.

    Make America Russian

  • itryed
    July 4, 2018 at 11:26 a.m.

    Where are the NeoNazi posts?

  • 23cal
    July 4, 2018 at 12:45 p.m.

    Itryed...good question. Where or where are our usual blowing and blustering goobers and Gomers?

  • Popsmith
    July 4, 2018 at 1:08 p.m.

    Seems fair since we meddled in Putin's reelection.

  • TimberTopper
    July 4, 2018 at 1:14 p.m.

    The answer to itried's question is, in hiding. They cannot handle the truth. That's why they watch the likes of Fox, and pay attention to their Russian Bots. I could say more, but I'll wait.

  • itryed
    July 4, 2018 at 2:44 p.m.

    Tryed

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT