Today's Paper Search Latest Core values App Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Story ideas iPad FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Sen. Jim Hendren (at lectern) speaks in the Senate chamber earlier this year. Hendren, the Senate president pro tempore-elect, wants to introduce live video streaming from the chamber and add streaming of legislative committee meetings in coordination with the House. The House already has video streaming of its chamber sessions. ( John Sykes Jr.)

When the Arkansas House of Representatives started video streaming its meetings eight years ago, then-state Sen. Shane Broadway, D-Bryant, said the Senate had no plans to do the same.

"The Senate has always wanted it to be traditional, the same way it's always been," Broadway told this newspaper in February 2010.

But if Senate President Pro Tempore-elect Jim Hendren, a Republican from Sulphur Springs, has his way, the Senate will begin live video streaming its sessions and committee meetings, starting in the regular legislative session that begins in January.

Hendren said he's agreed to work with House Speaker Matthew Shepherd, R-El Dorado, to also provide live video streaming of legislative committee meetings in the Multi-Agency Complex, just west of the state Capitol.

"That's a lot of work between now and January, but that would be my hope," Hendren said in a recent interview.

The Arkansas Senate is one of eight in the country -- including neighboring Missouri -- that don't provide video webcasts of their sessions in chambers, though they provide live audio, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures' website.

The Arkansas Senate is also one of 13 -- including Missouri -- that don't provide video webcasts of committee meetings, the conference said on its website.

Tim Beto, the Web administrator for the Texas Senate, said video streaming there started in 1999. Texas was one of the first states to do so.

"Hot legislative meetings can get thousands of people [watching]," he said.

In the Arkansas House, floor proceedings first aired in 2010, followed by committee meetings in 2011.

Over the past several years, some on the political right and left have repeatedly called on social media for the Arkansas Senate to follow suit.

Yet few senators have called for doing so.

In 2011, Sen. Jeremy Hutchinson, R-Little Rock, introduced a bill to require the Senate to broadcast live audio and video of its committee meetings on the Internet. That bill died in the Senate Transportation, Technology and Legislative Affairs Committee.

Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, said he's publicly promoted the idea of the Senate live streaming its meetings in the past few years, and he's happy that Hendren now supports that position.

"There has never been an appetite to do it until now," he said.

Rapert said "it's embarrassing" that the Senate doesn't broadcast its meetings, while many city councils and county quorum courts do so across the state.

"There is no reason whatsoever that the Arkansas Senate should remain dark. Transparency is a good thing for all concerned," Rapert said.

Hendren said he believes that live video streaming would help restore and protect the integrity of the Senate, and most of the senators understand that.

He said he views this as another step toward a transparent open legislative process and to "change the culture to one where we can be proud of."

Last month, senators approved an overhaul of their rules to create a committee on Senate ethics, prohibit senators from certain activities involving conflicts of interest, and require more disclosure of other conflicts and personal financial information.

The changes come in the aftermath of federal investigations that have led to the conviction of five former lawmakers -- three Republicans and two Democrats -- during the past few years.

Hendren said he's beginning to gather information from video vendors for colleagues to review in either August or September.

He said he's received a quote from one vendor of $400,000 to $500,000. He expects that a system for the Senate and committee would cost between that and $1 million.

"The House has a great system, and it's expensive," Hendren said.

The House spent $398,453 to install the cameras and other equipment. It entered into a contract with Granicus for webcasting and video archives with an upfront cost of $87,127, plus a monthly fee, said House spokesman Cecillea Pond-Mayo.

Since that time, the House has switched its contract to Sliq, which is paid $6,750 a quarter, she said. The House spent $427,193 to upgrade its audio system to digital in 2010, she said.

The House typically hires two to four part-time staff members each working about 20 hours a week to assist with committee meeting streaming during sessions of the Legislature, she said. The chamber has three full-time communications staffers, and "although we assist and oversee streaming during the session, we have other duties," she said.

Its video streaming policy states that "House sessions and committee meetings will be broadcast from gavel to gavel only."

"There shall be no broadcast of activity from the House floor or committee rooms before or after sessions or meetings, and no audio shall be broadcast other than during the actual sessions or meetings," the policy states. "Camera views shall be limited only to those members or members and staff in the vicinity of the speaker, members or chairpersons and members who are recognized by the Speaker or the chair of the committee, as well as those testifying before a committee.

"Random shots of members shall be restricted, other than nondescript, wide-angle shots, and shots of those engaged in questions and answers when recognized by the Speaker or the committee chair," the policy states.

As for how many people watch the video, Sliq provided an estimate of 150 live views a day during the 2017 regular session and 17,500 hits to the archives between Jan. 1-May 1, 2017, Pond-Mayo said. The live stream is shown on AETN and some Internet providers.

Senate President Pro Tempore Jonathan Dismang, R-Searcy, said the Senate started providing an audio broadcast of its floor proceedings during the 2015 regular session.

But senators haven't had in-depth discussions since then about live video streaming their proceedings largely because of the cost, said Dismang, who has been president pro tempore since November 2014.

With 35 members in the Senate compared with 100 members in the House, the Senate's proceedings historically have been less formal.

But video streaming in the Senate could change that.

Sen. Larry Teague, D-Nashville, said he worried that the Senate "would lose a little of its spontaneity" if its proceedings are video streamed, but "I believe in openness and all."

"I guess with the House live streaming I haven't noticed that it is causing any problems or difficulty," he said. "It is probably something that it is time for us to do."

Broadway, now vice president of university relations for the Arkansas State University System, said technology has changed a lot since 2010.

And so has the Senate, which has 15 members who spent some time as representatives.

"I figured it would happen eventually," Broadway said.

Photo by Staton Breidenthal
Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, is shown in this file photo.
Photo by Staton Breidenthal
Sen. Jim Hendren, R-Sulphur Springs, Senate President Pro Tempore-elect, talks during a press conference.
Photo by Staton Breidenthal
Senate President Pro Tempore Jonathan Dismang, R-Searcy, is shown in this photo.
Photo by Democrat-Gazette file photo
Sen Larry Teague, D-Nashville, is shown in this file photo.

SundayMonday on 07/05/2018

Print Headline: State Senate looking to video stream sessions, panel meetings

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • RBear
    July 5, 2018 at 7:19 a.m.

    It’s time the AR Senate came into the current century and started streaming its committee hearings and meetings. There are no more excuses and traditional doesn’t cut it anymore.

  • JMort69
    July 5, 2018 at 9:10 a.m.

    Oh please. Do we really think the back room deals with lobbyists are going to be livestreamed? Would Jeremy Hutchinson have streamed his meetings and alleged collusions with Rusty Cranford? All Rapert wants to do is be on some media so he can promote his part-time evangelist's agenda. This will change nothing except there will be more show boating. What is needed is a new group of lawmakers and new laws, not rules, laws. The same bunch who either participated in or allowed all the corruption to continue in our state house making up new rules for themselves, with no outside input, does nothing. Streaming the house meetings did not stop any of the corruption. It all occurs in secret, dark corners. Get rid of the lobbyists and then we might have some real change. Let the citizens have some input into our spending and then we might have some change. Right now the change we need is the membership of our legislature.

  • RBBrittain
    July 5, 2018 at 12:29 p.m.

    Oh please yourself, JMort69. Just because they can't livestream the backroom meetings is NOT an excuse for not livestreaming the PUBLIC meetings of the legislature and its committees. Tradition may be fine and dandy, but times have changed; the people deserve to see their legislature in action. I don't like Rapert either, but this is NOT a partisan issue; if he gets to showboat for the cameras, perhaps his district will see what he really is and vote him out (even if they don't do so in November).

  • Delta2
    July 5, 2018 at 1:51 p.m.

    Sounds appropriate for the Cartoon Network.

  • JMort69
    July 5, 2018 at 5:36 p.m.

    Sure hope you're right about Rapert, RB. I am probably the least partisan person who comments here. Don't like either worn out old party and have been a long-time Independent who always researches the person and that determines my vote. So, you're preaching to the choir on that issue. It's not that they can't show the back room deals, its that they won't, never will. It is those deals that have wreaked the illegal havoc in our legislature. That ain't going to change by showing the public meetings. Those will just be polished and rehearsed shows to try to convince us how honest our crooked legislators are. We need to change the legislature. That's the only solution to our current rampant corruption.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT