Today's Paper Latest stories Obits 10 things to do this weekend The TV Column Newsletters Wally Hall Weather Puzzles/games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption FILE - This Sept. 15, 2015 file photo shows marijuana plants a few weeks away from harvest in a medical marijuana cultivation center in Albion, Ill. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File)

Arkansas officially licensed its first medical marijuana growers on Tuesday after a contentious application process and monthslong court battle.

A spokesman for the state Department of Finance and Administration announced the issuance of the five cultivation permits in an email Tuesday, several hours after an Arkansas Supreme Court ruling lifting an injunction on the Medical Marijuana Commission was finalized.

An unsuccessful applicant's lawsuit upended the process in March, and a cascade of scoring irregularities, inconsistencies and allegations of wrongdoing followed the suit. Most of those issues remain unresolved, and medical marijuana industry attorneys on Tuesday said more legal challenges are coming.

"This is going to be tied up in court for years," said David Couch, the Little Rock attorney who drafted the constitutional amendment on legalizing medical cannabis that voters approved in 2016. Couch is also a member of Boll Weevil Farms of the Delta, which applied unsuccessfully for a cultivation license.

[DOCUMENTS: Read complaints filed + winning applications from top five growers]

The five companies awarded growing permits are:

• Natural State Medicinals Cultivation of Jefferson County.

• Bold Team of Woodruff County.

• Natural State Wellness Enterprises of Jackson County.

• Osage Creek Cultivation of Carroll County.

• Delta Medical Cannabis Co. of Jackson County.

It remains uncertain when the first dispensary will open in Arkansas, but at least one cultivation company said it will be able to provide medical cannabis next summer.

"BOLD is excited to move forward and implement the will of the people to serve patients in the State of Arkansas," Bold Team said in a statement. "This will allow BOLD to provide medical cannabis to qualifying patients in the summer of 2019 and for many years to come."

Former Attorney General Dustin McDaniel, a stakeholder and attorney for Natural State Wellness Enterprises, thanked the commission, saying his group was eager to get started.

"The voters have made clear that they want medication made available to patients expeditiously," he said. "We'll get to work immediately and waste no time."

Don Parker, a stakeholder and attorney for Delta Medical Cannabis Co., echoed McDaniel.

Latest medical marijuana headlines


"With the formal issuance of our license, Delta Medical will immediately proceed with continuing its medical marijuana cultivation efforts," Parker said in a statement. "We look forward to serving the citizens of Arkansas who are in need of its use and have been required to endure a lengthy delay in its availability."

Officials of the other two companies couldn't be reached for comment.

Amendment 98 to the Arkansas Constitution made Arkansas one of 30 states to legalize medical marijuana. The amendment created the commission for the purpose of awarding permits to grow and sell the drug, which must be grown in Arkansas.

The commissioners elected to review and merit-score all 95 cultivation applications themselves instead of hiring an independent consulting firm or using a lottery system, as was recommended by others. Unsuccessful applicants have attacked the scoring process in protest letters and lawsuits, and media outlets have also uncovered a variety of issues in the applications.

Scott Hardin, a Finance Department spokesman, said complaints against the five growing companies will be investigated by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division's enforcement section, and Alcoholic Beverage Control Board may "revoke a license if warranted."

The commission initially planned to award licenses during a formal meeting, but Hardin said in an email that the rules require the licenses to be issued after the successful applicants each pay their $100,000 licensing fee and post a $500,000 performance bond. All five groups met those requirements in March.

The commission planned to employ the same scoring process for dispensary applications, but last week it voted to explore hiring an independent consultant to grade the dispensary proposals. Commissioner Stephen Carroll, who proposed the change, said before making his motion that he thought the public was "losing trust" in the commission.

The commission plans to meet Thursday to discuss the next steps for licensing dispensaries. The meeting agenda also includes the discussion of an emergency rule change "concerning the extension of cultivation and dispensary applications, the awarding of additional or replacement licenses, and the [commission's] option to rely on the existing applications and scores to fulfill those licenses for a specified period of time."

The commission's current rules state that unsuccessful applicants are disqualified after the licenses have been formally issued, and the rules don't contemplate a scenario in which a company's license is revoked.

From a legal perspective, the next question is whether any unsuccessful cultivation applicants can successfully challenge the commission's licensing decisions in court. The state Supreme Court dismissed the previous lawsuit on procedural grounds, but attorneys aren't sure whether the high court's bar can ever be met.

The licensing process has been highly competitive because of the amount of money successful licensees stand to make. Many companies also believe that holding a medical marijuana license will give them an advantage over other companies in several years when they expect cannabis to be legalized for recreational use.

Alex Gray, an attorney for the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Association, said Tuesday that he expects more lawsuits to be filed against the commission, but he wasn't surprised it awarded growing permits because commissioners last week said they wanted to move the process forward.

Changing the scoring process, Gray said, would've done the opposite.

"Formulating some new procedure for scoring cultivation applications would result in lawsuits by the five successful applicants, and it would result in additional delays while the commission determines what that new process is," he said.

The Arkansas Department of Health has approved 5,546 patients with one of 18 qualifying conditions for medical marijuana registry ID cards. Those patients will be eligible to purchase medical cannabis from 32 dispensaries once they open.

A Section on 07/11/2018

Print Headline: Growers gain licenses for medical pot

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • Razrbak
    July 11, 2018 at 7:06 a.m.

    DFA says ABC Enforcement will investigate these questionable vendors. Big problem with that. ABC Enforcement Director Boyce Hamlet is a documented liar and cheat. He was fired by the Arkansas State Police for lying and cheating then hid his hiring and firing by the ASP to obtain jobs in law enforcement that he would not have been able to obtain had he told the truth. It's a cluster. Back in 2015, Judge Mackie Pierce stated that Hamlet posed problem for ABC Enforcement due to his issue with lack of honesty and trustworthiness.

  • condoleezza
    July 11, 2018 at 8:09 a.m.

    Use the term cannabis, not marijuana or pot, both of which carry historically negative connotations. Cannabis is neutral, scientific, and grown-up diction. Or is that too much for Gentle Editors to wrap their collective heads around?

  • BoudinMan
    July 11, 2018 at 8:14 a.m.

    doggod, then that would not align with the editors' agenda. They want to convey a "historically negative connotation." They so like the reefer madness aspect of this.

  • condoleezza
    July 11, 2018 at 8:29 a.m.

    BoudinMan, you got me there! I am waiting for them to contemplate the first patients smoking "doobies." LOL.

  • JMort69
    July 11, 2018 at 8:51 a.m.

    I note that other publications in the state refer to this as "medical marijuana". One has to wonder what and whose prejudice is driving this publication? Clearly they are biased, and have been since opposing the amendment legalizing MM. Is this some personal grudge or is it just some out-of-date attitude? It certainly backs up the theory that impartial journalism is dead and reporters now express only their biased opinions. Too bad. No matter how this publication tries to continue the stigma attached to this product, we the people voted. Perhaps this reporter simply can't believe the people of our state didn't listen to them. If they were less prejudiced, maybe they would garner more respect. In the meantime, our mandate marches on, leaving this tired old editorial board behind.

  • RBBrittain
    July 11, 2018 at 9:16 a.m.

    Puhleeze. The amendment that created this program calls it "medical marijuana"; "pot" is a shorter term for "marijuana" which works better for headline writers. (The article also uses "medical cannabis" further down.) ADG reporters & headline writers are *NOT* carrying out some hidden anti-marijuana agenda by using those words OR reporting on legitimate issues with the process. If there were some hidden anti-marijuana agenda at play here, how come Judge Wendell Griffen (a judge so liberal that the Arkansas Supreme Court took him off death-penalty cases) was the one who ruled against the licenses, while the presumably anti-marijuana conservatives on the ASC overturned him? The problem here is the process so far stinks even worse than marijuana smoke!

  • RBBrittain
    July 11, 2018 at 9:23 a.m.

    Frankly, I think doggod is the one with the hidden agenda. Perhaps they're shilling for the folks behind the amendment that was knocked off the ballot, which called it "cannabis"?

  • RBBrittain
    July 11, 2018 at 9:32 a.m.

    One problem I do have with this article: It doesn't CLEARLY say that these are the SAME five growers who were about to be awarded the licenses when Judge Griffen issued his injunction months ago. (They are; I checked.) That only encourages the opponents to try again, arguing that the Supreme Court reversed him only on procedural grounds; the second suit will likely introduce even more evidence against the process, including the attempted bribe AND the plagiarism.

  • Jfish
    July 11, 2018 at 10:23 a.m.

    Well said RB, most people will always refer to it as marijuana or pot. All of you grumblers should just be happy that it was finally legalized. I usually don't agree with Wendell "I have an agenda" Griffen, but he did make some valid points in this case.

  • condoleezza
    July 11, 2018 at 10:26 a.m.

    RBBrittan. "Pot" is a street slang that comes with obvious baggage (ie. "pothead"). I am just asking that our paper use neutral language in its reporting. I mean, otherwise, why not just use slang all the time? "Piss" instead of "urinate," for instance. I mean, it would save headline space.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT