Today's Paper Latest stories Obits Newsletters Traffic Weather Puzzles/games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Now that he is in effect Russia's president for life, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has ordered another big win for himself at the polls. This time he was awarded 76.7 percent of the vote at last rigged count. He just picks a number, a number to his liking, and sure enough the official tally will echo it down to the decimal point. (Hey, 7 is a lucky number! Let's use a couple of them!) It's like the terrible old days when all-wise, all-knowing Uncle Joe was in charge of stuffing the ballot boxes across all of Russia's time zones, and never failed to deliver anything but a resounding electoral victory for himself.

Comrade Putin was so sure of a victory this year that he didn't allow his No. 1 opponent on the ballot. Or should that be, he didn't allow his No. 1 opponent on the ballot, so he was certain of victory? Alexei Navalny, the leader of the opposition in Mother Russia, wasn't allowed to run. But look at it from Vladimir Putin's point of view: Why risk less than 76.7 percent? Some democracy they have in Russia, where the president/dictator/poll watcher gets to tell the opposition what names can go before the voters. Or as the communists in China used to say, and maybe still do, how good can an election be if the wrong side wins?

Mayor Daley the First, who was so popular that even the dead were recorded as voting for him, was a piker compared to the current Tsar of all the Russias. Here in these only sporadically United States of America, local and state political machines may erode the body politic like some slowly encroaching cancer. But in the home of Russian autocracy whether that of tsar or commissar, a whole culture and civilization may be wiped out at the whim of its brutal masters. Again and again. It might pay to examine the roots of so vast and regularly repealed a cataclysm in search of its cause and, perhaps one golden day, its cure.

The Russian poetess Nadezhda Mandelstam saw that "the basic error of our times" was to replace "the idea of popular education" with "the political concept of indoctrination." And so the priceless riches of culture and tradition were deliberately spurned and forgotten, and the religion of Progressive ideology, "the idea . . . that people can foresee the future, change the course of history and make it rational" was dubbed a science. Meanwhile, as Jacob Howland puts it in the March issue of New Criterion, "actual sciences like biology and linguistics--to say nothing of softer disciplines like history and sociology--were infected with ideology; dedicated scholars who refused to embrace crackpot theories lost their careers and sometimes their lives. A 'language of state' came into being; words shifted in meaning, and fundamental distinctions were effaced. This new, debased, and coarsened speech was diligently policed for doctrinal correctness. 'Coldly calculated versification,' promoting officially approved lessons and attitudes, replaced 'true poetry.'"

This whole process became known, in pseudo-Marxist ideology, as giving history a push in the politically correct direction. For dreadful example, just look and see what is happening on too many college campuses in this country. Nadezhda Mandelstam wept bitter tears over what was being done to her country and indeed her whole national heritage, but she refused to stop fighting. The cultural vandals were ransacking what had made Russia great, from her literature to her very spirit. But before Nadezhda Mandelstam had to descend into the silence of the grave, she did leave us this warning and prophecy:

"Nothing can be predicted with certainty: people could even forget how to read altogether and books molder away to dust. We might even stop talking with each other and communicate only by emitting call signs or bloodcurdling war cries. Sometimes I think this is what we are coming to. We did, after all, learn to speak in a lying code language designed to conceal our real thoughts. One's descendants pay for such things by losing the power of articulate speech altogether, caterwauling instead like fans at a football game."

God forgive those who have brought Mother Russia to such an ugly pass. But lest we forget, God's nature is to forgive. We mere mortals, however, can forgive these crimes against past and future. But can we ever forgive ourselves for allowing such things to happen? Let's hope so. For where there is forgiveness, there is hope for a brighter and braver future--for the Russians and for all the world.

Editorial on 03/22/2018

Print Headline: Let's hear it for tyranny

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • JIMBOB47
    March 22, 2018 at 5:34 a.m.

    So can someone tell us what the difference is between Putin and the Daley machines of Chicago?... none...

  • TimberTopper
    March 22, 2018 at 6:45 a.m.

    There's many differences.

  • hah406
    March 22, 2018 at 8:24 a.m.

    Hey Jimbo, I have one. Daley never had his opponents murdered openly in front of city hall.

  • 23cal
    March 22, 2018 at 8:40 a.m.

    This column was....beyond strange.
    I get that it is some kind of screed against progressives, science, and modernity, as usual from this source, but I think it lists Putin as a progressive and pretends it is progressives, not conservatives, who are always banning books.
    What a rambling bunch of unsupported drivel.

  • skeptic1
    March 22, 2018 at 9:48 a.m.

    Lots in disappointment here that the author didn't marry Trump to Putin, but then even Bernie Sanders is getting sick of that nonsense.

  • PopMom
    March 22, 2018 at 9:59 a.m.

    And yet the ADG supports Trump who is one of Putin's biggest cheerleaders and the ADG supports the Arkansas congressional delegation which looks the other way while Trump supports this dictator. At least John McCain had the nerve to call Trump out for congratulating Putin on his "win."

  • WhododueDiligence
    March 22, 2018 at 10:01 a.m.

    Yes, 23cal, and also a typical screed against educators. This editorial quotes and endorses the complaints of Jacob Howland. In the cited New Criterion commentary, Howland does a good job of describing the murderous rampages during Stalin's Soviet reign. But then he goes way overboard off the deep end by comparing it to today's US college campuses where according to Howland professors and students act like police.
    *
    In that column Howland said: "If Nadezhda is right that 'any era should be judged by the degree to which it is possible to exercise the basic human right of professing one's faith and speaking one's mind,' we are doing poorly indeed."
    As if the Soviet state-sponsored mass murders, gulags, and speech suppression Nadezhda wrote about are in any way comparable to feeble political correctness attempts by some educators in our free society.
    Also in that column Howland howled that Charlottesville was similar to communists fighting against Nazis in Weimar Germany.
    *
    Once again the extreme right's victim mentality is extremely overplayed to ridiculous extremes.
    Weird.

  • 3WorldState1
    March 22, 2018 at 10:47 a.m.

    The reason the General for Fox news quit saying, "“As a retired military officer, I simply could not continue with Fox in good conscience,” His letter, denouncing the network as “a mere propaganda machine,”
    I checked Fox "News" online the day he quit. Not one word I could find on it. But tons of Hannity and Ingram crap.
    People are meaner and dumber for watching Fox.
    What the hell happened to the Republican party? I'm starting to think because the base is religious fanatics. And they will believe anything. Just look around the world where religious fanatics run things. Nutso!

  • Packman
    March 22, 2018 at 11:04 a.m.

    Agree with 23cal. The 3 minutes it took to read this is 3 minutes of my life I'll never get back.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT