Today's Paper Latest stories 2018 election city/county races Most commented Obits Traffic Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Gina Haspel, testifying May 9, emphasized the historic nature of her nomination and noted “the outpouring of support from young women at CIA who consider it a good sign for their own prospects.”

WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted Thursday to confirm Gina Haspel as the next CIA director after several Democrats were persuaded to support her despite their concerns about her role in the torture of suspects captured after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Lawmakers approved Haspel's appointment 54-45, with six Democrats voting yes and two Republicans voting no, after the agency carried out an unprecedented public relations campaign to bolster Haspel's chances.

She appears to have been helped by some last-minute arm-twisting by former CIA directors John Brennan and Leon Panetta, who contacted at least five of the six Democrats who voted to endorse her bid to join President Donald Trump's Cabinet, according to people with knowledge of the interactions.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called Trump's choice of Haspel, the CIA's acting director, to lead the agency "the right woman at the right time."

Haspel has not had as close of a relationship with Trump as the CIA's previous director, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is one of the president's closest advisers, according to people with knowledge of Haspel and Trump's interactions.

But she has to some extent influenced the president's stance on Russia, whose aggressive and adversarial posture toward the West has become a top national security priority for the administration.

After a nerve-agent attack in Britain that U.S. and British officials blamed on the Russian government, Haspel argued for a forceful response, which ultimately led to the U.S. expelling 60 Russian intelligence operatives and shuttering a Russian consulate in Seattle, people with knowledge of her role said.

Haspel was a leading player in the multiagency response to the attack and advised the president to make a bold demonstration to counter Russia and stand with Britain, the United States' closest intelligence ally, these people said.

Still, several senators said Haspel had not been forthcoming in answering questions about her role in a former CIA program to brutally detain and interrogate terror suspects at covert sites abroad after the 9/11 attacks.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a floor speech that Haspel "offered up almost the classic Washington nonapology."

He asked how the Senate could take seriously Haspel's "conversion on torture."

Trump had wavered in his support for Haspel, at times expressing doubt in private meetings about whether she had the support to win confirmation, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Earlier this month, Haspel sought to withdraw after some White House officials worried her role in the interrogation program could derail her chances.

Trump decided to push for Haspel to stay in the running, after first signaling he would support whatever decision she made, administration officials said.

Haspel, 61, will be the first woman to serve as the spy agency's director. When Haspel joined the CIA in 1985, there were fewer opportunities for women to live the life of a cloak-and-dagger operative that she found alluring.

Haspel took a posting as a field officer in Ethiopia, an unglamorous assignment but one that taught her to run operations against agents for the Soviet Union, then a benefactor of the Ethiopian government.

Her first chief-of-station assignment, in Baku, Azerbaijan, in 1996, prompted skepticism from male colleagues, who thought the CIA shouldn't send a woman to such a remote and rough location, according to people who worked with Haspel.

Haspel's request for a transfer to the CIA's counterterrorism center proved to be a fateful move. Her first day on the job was Sept. 11, 2001, and she became an integral part of the CIA's early operations against al-Qaida, according to current and former colleagues.

At the time, counterterrorism was also a less coveted assignment, and an area where women were getting significant jobs and excelling at them.

In her bid to become the next director, Haspel and her supporters emphasized the historic nature of her nomination and how her career tracked with the rise of women in the intelligence services.

"It is not my way to trumpet the fact that I am a woman up for the top job, but I would be remiss in not remarking on it -- not least because of the outpouring of support from young women at CIA who consider it a good sign for their own prospects," Haspel told senators at her confirmation hearing last week.

After Thursday's vote, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats called Haspel a "trailblazer," praising the mix of "front-line and executive experience" she has accumulated over a long career at the agency.

"Her confirmation represents the best we have to offer as a country," he said.

QUESTION OF TORTURE

But it is the dark chapters of Haspel's past -- and that of the CIA -- that imperiled her nomination from the start and will not be closed even as she takes over at the agency's headquarters in Langley, Va.

Throughout her nomination, Haspel and her supporters struggled to reconcile her portrayal as a capable, forceful leader, but one who lacked the authority to stop the interrogation program or overrule her boss's decisions to order harsh interrogations and then destroy videotaped evidence.

Critics said she lacked the will to do so and were unpersuaded that she had learned a moral lesson from the agency's torture of terror suspects -- a program that was disbanded but that Trump has said should be restarted.

In late 2002, Haspel, then a senior leader in the counterterrorism unit, managed a secret detention facility in Thailand where two al-Qaida suspects were waterboarded, one of them before Haspel's arrival.

Laura Pitter, a national-security counsel at Human Rights Watch, called Haspel's confirmation "the predictable and perverse byproduct" of the United States' failure to reconcile with past abuses.

"The torture at the center of the CIA's rendition, detention, and interrogation program was a crime plain and simple, but the U.S. government has never been willing to admit that or to take appropriate action," she said. "Until it does, the U.S. aligns itself with countries that undermine respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law."

During her confirmation hearing, Haspel insisted she would never allow torture at the CIA again, and she said she'd be guided in the future by her own "moral compass." But she resolutely avoided saying whether, at the time, she thought the detention and interrogation of suspects were moral.

That reticence prompted Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who is in Arizona fighting a rare and serious form of brain cancer, to release a statement urging his colleagues to oppose Haspel's nomination. McCain's forceful appeal, which carries the weight of his own experience enduring years of torture as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, appears to have swayed some Democrats who were on the fence about their vote and fellow Arizona Republican Jeff Flake to vote against Haspel.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was the other Republican senator to vote against Haspel.

But the two GOP dissenters did not come close enough to block her confirmation, particularly after Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., declared earlier this week that he would support her.

A key to winning over skeptical Democrats was a letter Haspel wrote this week to Warner, at his urging, saying that "with the benefit of hindsight and my experience as a senior agency leader, the enhanced interrogation program is not one the CIA should have undertaken."

But she stopped short of condemning the people "that made these hard calls" and again cited "valuable intelligence collected" through the program -- despite the findings of the committee's report on torture, released in 2014, that concluded that the CIA's methods were not a viable means of gaining information.

Most Democrats did not come around to Haspel's side.

Among the six Democrats who did are several who are up for re-election this fall in states where Trump is popular, including Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Bill Nelson of Florida. Warner and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire were the others.

"This was not an easy decision," Heitkamp said in a statement earlier this week explaining her support.

Heitkamp said she was persuaded, though, by her one-on-one meetings with Haspel. She "explained to me that the agency should not have employed such tactics in the past and has assured me that it will not do so in the future."

Some Trump-state Democrats, though, including Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama, opposed the nominee. Jones said this week that "it's just hard to get over" the torture issue.

A protester in the Senate visitor gallery briefly disrupted speeches ahead of the vote with shouts against the CIA.

Information for this article was contributed by Shane Harris and Karoun Demirjian of The Washington Post and by Lisa Mascaro and Deb Riechmann of The Associated Press.

Photo by AP/ALEX BRANDON
U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., leaves the Senate floor Thursday after Gina Haspel was confirmed as director of the CIA.

A Section on 05/18/2018

Print Headline: 54-45 vote in Senate gives Haspel CIA job

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT